These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25946148)

  • 1. Reactions to ingroup and outgroup deviants: an experimental group paradigm for black sheep effect.
    Rullo M; Presaghi F; Livi S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125605. PubMed ID: 25946148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corralling the ingroup: deviant derogation and perception of group variability.
    Hutchison P; Abrams D; De Moura GR
    J Soc Psychol; 2013; 153(3):334-50. PubMed ID: 23724703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluations of and reasoning about normative and deviant ingroup and outgroup members: development of the black sheep effect.
    Abrams D; Palmer SB; Rutland A; Cameron L; Van de Vyver J
    Dev Psychol; 2014 Jan; 50(1):258-70. PubMed ID: 23544855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ingroup favoritism or the black sheep effect: Perceived intentions modulate subjective responses to aggressive interactions.
    Wang L; Zheng J; Meng L; Lu Q; Ma Q
    Neurosci Res; 2016 Jul; 108():46-54. PubMed ID: 26851770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The black sheep effect: The case of the deviant ingroup robot.
    Steain A; Stanton CJ; Stevens CJ
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0222975. PubMed ID: 31618216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceived entitativity and the black-sheep effect: when will we denigrate negative ingroup members?
    Lewis AC; Sherman SJ
    J Soc Psychol; 2010; 150(2):211-25. PubMed ID: 20397595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Social identity, peer group rejection, and young children's reactive, displaced, and proactive aggression.
    Nesdale D; Duffy A
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2011 Nov; 29(Pt 4):823-41. PubMed ID: 21995740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Justice reactions to deviant ingroup members: Ingroup identity threat motivates utilitarian punishments.
    Fousiani K; Yzerbyt V; Kteily NS; Demoulin S
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2019 Oct; 58(4):869-893. PubMed ID: 30648270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of mortality salience on evaluation of ingroup and outgroup sources: the impact of pro- versus counterattitudinal positions.
    See YH; Petty RE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Mar; 32(3):405-16. PubMed ID: 16455866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visualizing minimal ingroup and outgroup faces: implications for impressions, attitudes, and behavior.
    Ratner KG; Dotsch R; Wigboldus DH; van Knippenberg A; Amodio DM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2014 Jun; 106(6):897-911. PubMed ID: 24841095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Competitive victimhood as a response to accusations of ingroup harm doing.
    Sullivan D; Landau MJ; Branscombe NR; Rothschild ZK
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Apr; 102(4):778-95. PubMed ID: 22229457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Taking Seriously Ingroup Self-Evaluation, Meta-Prejudice, and Prejudice in Analyzing Interreligious Relations.
    Putra IE
    Span J Psychol; 2016 Jul; 19():E46. PubMed ID: 27426239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Playing violent video games increases intergroup bias.
    Greitemeyer T
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2014 Jan; 40(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 24085715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Black sheep effect and ingroup favoritism in social identity perspective].
    Oishi C; Yoshida F
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2002 Dec; 73(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 12625238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When shared group membership signifies shared subjective experience: I-sharing and the minimal group paradigm.
    Long AE; Pinel EC; Yawger GC
    J Soc Psychol; 2017; 157(4):389-406. PubMed ID: 27668756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implicit ingroup metafavoritism: subtle preference for ingroup members displaying ingroup bias.
    Castelli L; Tomelleri S; Zogmaister C
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jun; 34(6):807-18. PubMed ID: 18359956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Membership status and subjective group dynamics: who triggers the black sheep effect?
    Pinto IR; Marques JM; Levine JM; Abrams D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Jul; 99(1):107-19. PubMed ID: 20565188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Behavioral immune system and ingroup derogation: the effects of infectious diseases on ingroup derogation attitudes.
    Wu Q; Tan C; Wang B; Zhou P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0122794. PubMed ID: 25816247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Group membership, group norms, empathy, and young children's intentions to aggress.
    Nesdale D; Milliner E; Duffy A; Griffiths JA
    Aggress Behav; 2009; 35(3):244-58. PubMed ID: 19309004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The infamous among us: Enhanced reputational memory for uncooperative ingroup members.
    Hechler S; Neyer FJ; Kessler T
    Cognition; 2016 Dec; 157():1-13. PubMed ID: 27568585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.