235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25946663)
1. Rapid Osseointegration of Titanium Implant With Innovative Nanoporous Surface Modification: Animal Model and Clinical Trial.
Huang MS; Chen LK; Ou KL; Cheng HY; Wang CS
Implant Dent; 2015 Aug; 24(4):441-7. PubMed ID: 25946663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Osseointegration of titanium implants with SLAffinity treatment: a histological and biomechanical study in miniature pigs.
Ou KL; Hsu HJ; Yang TS; Lin YH; Chen CS; Peng PW
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Sep; 20(7):1515-24. PubMed ID: 26507647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Research of StemBios Cell Therapy on Dental Implants Containing Nanostructured Surfaces: Biomechanical Behaviors, Microstructural Characteristics, and Clinical Trial.
Ou KL; Weng CC; Wu CC; Lin YH; Chiang HJ; Yang TS; Wang J; Yen Y; Cheng HY; Sugiatno E
Implant Dent; 2016 Feb; 25(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 26473440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early bone response to machined, sandblasting acid etching (SLA) and novel surface-functionalization (SLAffinity) titanium implants: characterization, biomechanical analysis and histological evaluation in pigs.
Chiang HJ; Hsu HJ; Peng PW; Wu CZ; Ou KL; Cheng HY; Walinski CJ; Sugiatno E
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2016 Feb; 104(2):397-405. PubMed ID: 26418567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of osseous integration of titanium orthopedic screws with novel SLA treatment in porcine model.
Lin TH; Hu HT; Wang HC; Wu MC; Wu SW; Yeh ML
PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188364. PubMed ID: 29149204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hybrid micro/nanostructural surface offering improved stress distribution and enhanced osseointegration properties of the biomedical titanium implant.
Hou PJ; Ou KL; Wang CC; Huang CF; Ruslin M; Sugiatno E; Yang TS; Chou HH
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Mar; 79():173-180. PubMed ID: 29306080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of the influence of the macro- and microstructure of dental zirconium implants on osseointegration: a minipig study.
Mueller CK; Solcher P; Peisker A; Mtsariashvilli M; Schlegel KA; Hildebrand G; Rost J; Liefeith K; Chen J; Schultze-Mosgau S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Jul; 116(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 22762921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of dehiscences to the bone response of implants with an Acid-etched surface: an experimental study in miniature pigs.
Ruehe B; Heberer S; Bayreuther K; Nelson K
J Oral Implantol; 2011; 37(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 20557147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Titanium implant functionalization with phosphate-containing polymers may favour in vivo osseointegration.
Cardoso MV; de Rycker J; Chaudhari A; Coutinho E; Yoshida Y; Van Meerbeek B; Mesquita MF; da Silva WJ; Yoshihara K; Vandamme K; Duyck J
J Clin Periodontol; 2017 Sep; 44(9):950-960. PubMed ID: 28453878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Osseointegration of Zirconia in the Presence of Multinucleated Giant Cells.
Chappuis V; Cavusoglu Y; Gruber R; Kuchler U; Buser D; Bosshardt DD
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Aug; 18(4):686-98. PubMed ID: 26377587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vivo performance of zirconia and titanium implants: a histomorphometric study in mini pig maxillae.
Gahlert M; Roehling S; Sprecher CM; Kniha H; Milz S; Bormann K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Mar; 23(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 21806681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early Osseointegration Events on Neoss® ProActive and Bimodal Implants: A Comparison of Different Surfaces in an Animal Model.
Grossi-Oliveira GA; Antunes AA; Elias CN; Wennerberg A; Sennerby L; Salata LA
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1060-72. PubMed ID: 26780622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface.
Buser D; Broggini N; Wieland M; Schenk RK; Denzer AJ; Cochran DL; Hoffmann B; Lussi A; Steinemann SG
J Dent Res; 2004 Jul; 83(7):529-33. PubMed ID: 15218041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Osseointegration of short titan implants: A pilot study in pigs.
Botzenhart U; Kunert-Keil C; Heinemann F; Gredes T; Seiler J; Berniczei-Roykó Á; Gedrange T
Ann Anat; 2015 May; 199():16-22. PubMed ID: 24780612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanism and Clinical Properties of StemBios Cell Therapy: Induction of Early Osseointegration in Novel Dental Implants.
Weng CC; Ou KL; Wu CY; Huang YH; Wang J; Yen Y; Cheng HY; Lin YH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(1):e47-e54. PubMed ID: 28095525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Osseointegration of commercial microstructured titanium implants incorporating magnesium: a histomorphometric study in rabbit cancellous bone.
Park JW; An CH; Jeong SH; Suh JY
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Mar; 23(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 21435010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The experimental research on two-generation BLB dental implants - part I: surface modification and osseointegration.
Yin K; Wang Z; Fan X; Bian Y; Guo J; Lan J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jul; 23(7):846-52. PubMed ID: 21564304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Secondary stability assessment of titanium implants with an alkali-etched surface: a resonance frequency analysis study in beagle dogs.
Strnad J; Urban K; Povysil C; Strnad Z
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):502-12. PubMed ID: 18700375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.
Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ
J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
