These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25948700)

  • 1. Non-Reflective Thinkers Are Predisposed to Attribute Supernatural Causation to Uncanny Experiences.
    Bouvet R; Bonnefon JF
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Jul; 41(7):955-61. PubMed ID: 25948700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief.
    Pennycook G; Cheyne JA; Seli P; Koehler DJ; Fugelsang JA
    Cognition; 2012 Jun; 123(3):335-46. PubMed ID: 22481051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The separate roles of the reflective mind and involuntary inhibitory control in gatekeeping paranormal beliefs and the underlying intuitive confusions.
    Svedholm AM; Lindeman M
    Br J Psychol; 2013 Aug; 104(3):303-19. PubMed ID: 23848383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Examining the relationship between metacognitive trust in thinking styles and supernatural beliefs.
    van Mulukom V; Baimel A; Maraldi E; Farias M
    Scand J Psychol; 2024 Apr; 65(2):206-222. PubMed ID: 37746878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Paranormal belief, thinking style preference and susceptibility to confirmatory conjunction errors.
    Rogers P; Fisk JE; Lowrie E
    Conscious Cogn; 2018 Oct; 65():182-196. PubMed ID: 30199770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Skepticism: Genuine unbelief or implicit beliefs in the supernatural?
    Lindeman M; Svedholm-Häkkinen AM; Riekki T
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 May; 42():216-228. PubMed ID: 27043273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Erosion of belief and disbelief: effects of religiosity and negative affect on beliefs in the paranormal and supernatural.
    Beck R; Miller JP
    J Soc Psychol; 2001 Apr; 141(2):277-87. PubMed ID: 11372570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cognitive styles and religion.
    Yilmaz O
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2021 Aug; 40():150-154. PubMed ID: 33130329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vitalistic thinking in adults.
    Wilson S
    Br J Psychol; 2013 Nov; 104(4):512-24. PubMed ID: 24094281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Magical Potential: Why Magic Performances Should be Used to Explore the Psychological Factors Contributing to Human Belief Formation.
    Mohr C; Lesaffre L; Kuhn G
    Integr Psychol Behav Sci; 2019 Mar; 53(1):126-137. PubMed ID: 30251211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The divided mind of a disbeliever: Intuitive beliefs about nature as purposefully created among different groups of non-religious adults.
    Järnefelt E; Canfield CF; Kelemen D
    Cognition; 2015 Jul; 140():72-88. PubMed ID: 25880608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Supernatural Belief Is Not Modulated by Intuitive Thinking Style or Cognitive Inhibition.
    Farias M; van Mulukom V; Kahane G; Kreplin U; Joyce A; Soares P; Oviedo L; Hernu M; Rokita K; Savulescu J; Möttönen R
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):15100. PubMed ID: 29118434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the cognitive reflection test as a measure of intuition/reflection, numeracy, and insight problem solving, and the implications for understanding real-world judgments and beliefs.
    Patel N; Baker SG; Scherer LD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Dec; 148(12):2129-2153. PubMed ID: 31021149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Paranormal psychic believers and skeptics: a large-scale test of the cognitive differences hypothesis.
    Gray SJ; Gallo DA
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):242-61. PubMed ID: 26503412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is the cognitive reflection test a measure of both reflection and intuition?
    Pennycook G; Cheyne JA; Koehler DJ; Fugelsang JA
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Mar; 48(1):341-8. PubMed ID: 25740762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief.
    Gervais WM; Norenzayan A
    Science; 2012 Apr; 336(6080):493-6. PubMed ID: 22539725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of event vividness, event severity, and prior paranormal belief on attributions towards a depicted remarkable coincidence experience: Two studies examining the misattribution hypothesis.
    Rogers P; Qualter P; Wood D
    Br J Psychol; 2016 Nov; 107(4):710-751. PubMed ID: 26829906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The metacognitive advantage of deliberative thinkers: a dual-process perspective on overconfidence.
    Mata A; Ferreira MB; Sherman SJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Sep; 105(3):353-73. PubMed ID: 23895268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Supernatural punishment beliefs as cognitively compelling tools of social control.
    Fitouchi L; Singh M
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2022 Apr; 44():252-257. PubMed ID: 34752999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gender role orientation, thinking style preference and facets of adult paranormality: A mediation analysis.
    Rogers P; Hattersley M; French CC
    Conscious Cogn; 2019 Nov; 76():102821. PubMed ID: 31590056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.