171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25948801)
1. Systematic ultrasound-guided saturation and template biopsy of the prostate: indications and advantages of extended sampling.
Isbarn H; Briganti A; De Visschere PJ; Fütterer JJ; Ghadjar P; Giannarini G; Ost P; Ploussard G; Sooriakumaran P; Surcel CI; van Oort IM; Yossepowitch O; van den Bergh RC;
Arch Esp Urol; 2015 Apr; 68(3):296-306. PubMed ID: 25948801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contemporary role of systematic prostate biopsies: indications, techniques, and implications for patient care.
Ukimura O; Coleman JA; de la Taille A; Emberton M; Epstein JI; Freedland SJ; Giannarini G; Kibel AS; Montironi R; Ploussard G; Roobol MJ; Scattoni V; Jones JS
Eur Urol; 2013 Feb; 63(2):214-30. PubMed ID: 23021971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An update on prostate biopsy in the era of magnetic resonance imaging.
Cicione A; De Nunzio C; Manno S; Damiano R; Posti A; Lima E; Tubaro A; Balloni F
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2018 Jun; 70(3):264-274. PubMed ID: 29595039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.
Kaufmann B; Saba K; Schmidli TS; Stutz S; Bissig L; Britschgi AJ; Schaeren E; Gu A; Langenegger N; Sulser T; Eberli D; Keller EX; Hermanns T; Poyet C
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 34914121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is an initial saturation prostate biopsy scheme better than an extended scheme for detection of prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jiang X; Zhu S; Feng G; Zhang Z; Li C; Li H; Wang C; Xu Y
Eur Urol; 2013 Jun; 63(6):1031-9. PubMed ID: 23414775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.
Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Boxler S; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Klein T; Steinemann S; Bergstraesser C; Roethke M; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25079939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing Three Different Techniques for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies: A Systematic Review of In-bore versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound fusion versus Cognitive Registration. Is There a Preferred Technique?
Wegelin O; van Melick HHE; Hooft L; Bosch JLHR; Reitsma HB; Barentsz JO; Somford DM
Eur Urol; 2017 Apr; 71(4):517-531. PubMed ID: 27568655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transperineal template-guided saturation biopsy aimed at sampling one core for each milliliter of prostate volume: 103 cases requiring repeat prostate biopsy.
Nakai Y; Tanaka N; Anai S; Miyake M; Hori S; Tatsumi Y; Morizawa Y; Fujii T; Konishi N; Fujimoto K
BMC Urol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):28. PubMed ID: 28381267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are concurrent systematic cores needed at the time of targeted biopsy in patients with prior negative prostate biopsies?
Albisinni S; Aoun F; Noel A; El Rassy E; Lemort M; Paesmans M; van Velthoven R; Roumeguère T; Peltier A
Prog Urol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 29203158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial.
Tonttila PP; Lantto J; Pääkkö E; Piippo U; Kauppila S; Lammentausta E; Ohtonen P; Vaarala MH
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 26033153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the optimal strategy in men with a single unilateral suspicious lesion on MRI undergoing transperineal MRI/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy.
Yusim I; Mazor E; Frumkin E; Jabareen M; Hefer B; Elsaraya N; Li S; Rouvinov K; Novack V; Mabjeesh NJ
Prostate; 2023 Sep; 83(13):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 37263774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The prostate cancer detection rates of CEUS-targeted versus MRI-targeted versus systematic TRUS-guided biopsies in biopsy-naïve men: a prospective, comparative clinical trial using the same patients.
Postema AW; Scheltema MJ; Mannaerts CK; Van Sloun RJ; Idzenga T; Mischi M; Engelbrecht MR; De la Rosette JJ; Wijkstra H
BMC Urol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):27. PubMed ID: 28381220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transperineal Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy Combined with Standard Template Improves Prostate Cancer Detection.
Kim MM; Wu S; Lin SX; Crotty RK; Harisinghani M; Feldman AS; Wu CL; Dahl DM
J Urol; 2022 Jan; 207(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 34428921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Additive Value of Transrectal Systematic Ventral Biopsies in Combination with Magnet Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy in Patients with 3 or More Negative Prostate Biopsies.
Maxeiner A; Nest AM; Stephan C; Cash H; Baur ADJ; Fischer T; Kilic E; Piper SK; Nowak CP; Busch J; Miller K; Mang J
Urol Int; 2020; 104(3-4):205-213. PubMed ID: 31801153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies.
Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Blondin D; Quentin M; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Gabbert HE; Becker N; Antoch G; Albers P; Schimmöller L
Eur Urol; 2015 Oct; 68(4):713-20. PubMed ID: 26116294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective evaluation of an extended 21-core biopsy scheme as initial prostate cancer diagnostic strategy.
Ploussard G; Nicolaiew N; Marchand C; Terry S; Vacherot F; Vordos D; Allory Y; Abbou CC; Salomon L; de la Taille A
Eur Urol; 2014 Jan; 65(1):154-61. PubMed ID: 22698576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can MRI/TRUS fusion targeted biopsy replace saturation prostate biopsy in the re-evaluation of men in active surveillance?
Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M
World J Urol; 2016 Sep; 34(9):1249-53. PubMed ID: 26699628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiparametric MRI in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing repeat biopsy: a prospective comparison with clinical findings and histopathology.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Thomsen HS
Acta Radiol; 2018 Mar; 59(3):371-380. PubMed ID: 28679325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of Transperineal Targeted Prostate Biopsies, Visual Estimation and Image Fusion in Men Needing Repeat Biopsy in the PICTURE Trial.
Simmons LAM; Kanthabalan A; Arya M; Briggs T; Barratt D; Charman SC; Freeman A; Hawkes D; Hu Y; Jameson C; McCartan N; Moore CM; Punwani S; van der Muelen J; Emberton M; Ahmed HU
J Urol; 2018 Dec; 200(6):1227-1234. PubMed ID: 30017964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
