163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25949220)
1. Measurement and comparison of head scatter factor for 7 MV unflattened (FFF) and 6 MV flattened photon beam using indigenously designed columnar mini phantom.
Ashokkumar S; Nambiraj A; Sinha SN; Yadav G; Raman K; Bhushan M; Thiyagarajan R
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2015; 20(3):170-80. PubMed ID: 25949220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Head Scatter Factor for 6MV and 10MV flattened (FB) and Unflattened (FFF) Photon Beam using indigenously Designed Columnar Mini Phantom.
Ashokkumar S; Nambi Raj NA; Sinha SN; Yadav G; Thiyagarajan R; Raman K; Mishra MB
J Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 39(3):184-91. PubMed ID: 25190997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SU-E-T-149: Scatter Factors Comparison of 6MV Flattened and 7MV Unflattened Beams.
Ashokkumar S; Sinha SN; Yadav G; Raman K; Thiyagarajan R; Nambiraj NA
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part12):3737. PubMed ID: 28517836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. SU-E-T-151: Effect of Surface Dose and Depth of Maximum Dose with Physical Wedge Filters for 6MV Flattened and 7MV Unflattened Photon Beams.
Ashokkumar S; Sinha SN; Yadav G; Raman K; Thiyagarajan R; Nambiraj NA
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part12):3737-3738. PubMed ID: 28517808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of surface dose delivered by 7 MV-unflattened and 6 MV-flattened photon beams.
Sigamani A; Nambiraj A
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2017; 22(3):243-250. PubMed ID: 28479873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of phantom scatter from flattened and flattening filter free high-energy photon beams.
Richmond N; Allen V; Daniel J; Dacey R; Walker C
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 25454113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Beam characteristics of energy-matched flattening filter free beams.
Paynter D; Weston SJ; Cosgrove VP; Evans JA; Thwaites DI
Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):052103. PubMed ID: 24784392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric characteristics of 6 and 10MV unflattened photon beams.
Kragl G; af Wetterstedt S; Knäusl B; Lind M; McCavana P; Knöös T; McClean B; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):141-6. PubMed ID: 19592123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A surface energy spectral study on the bone heterogeneity and beam obliquity using the flattened and unflattened photon beams.
Chow JC; Owrangi AM
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2016; 21(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 26900360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An analytical formalism to calculate phantom scatter factors for flattening filter free (FFF) mode photon beams.
Chung H; Prado KL; Yi BY
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 59(4):951-60. PubMed ID: 24503449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison between direct TMR measurements and TMRs calculated from PDDs using BJR Supplement 25 data for flattened and unflattened photon beams.
Sutherland B; Middlebrook N; Kairn T; Hill B
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2015 Sep; 38(3):503-7. PubMed ID: 26123946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monte Carlo Study of Unflattened Photon Beams Shaped by Multileaf Collimator.
Kajaria A; Sharma N; Sharma S; Pradhan S; Mandal A; Aggarwal LM
J Biomed Phys Eng; 2019 Apr; 9(2):137-150. PubMed ID: 31214519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Measurement of peak correction factor of Farmer chamber for calibration of flattening filter free (FFF) clinical photon beams].
Kontra G; Major T; Polgár C
Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 26035159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Flattening filter free beams in SBRT and IMRT: dosimetric assessment of peripheral doses.
Kragl G; Baier F; Lutz S; Albrich D; Dalaryd M; Kroupa B; Wiezorek T; Knöös T; Georg D
Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):91-101. PubMed ID: 20888199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric properties of equivalent-quality flattening filter-free (FFF) and flattened photon beams of Versa HD linear accelerator.
Meshram MN; Pramanik S; Ranjith CP; Gopal SK; Dobhal R
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):358-370. PubMed ID: 27167293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Field correction factors for a PTW-31016 Pinpoint ionization chamber for both flattened and unflattened beams. Study of the main sources of uncertainties.
Puxeu-Vaqué J; Duch MA; Nailon WH; Cruz Lizuain M; Ginjaume M
Med Phys; 2017 May; 44(5):1930-1938. PubMed ID: 28261817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surface dose measurements and comparison of unflattened and flattened photon beams.
Sigamani A; Nambiraj A; Yadav G; Giribabu A; Srinivasan K; Gurusamy V; Raman K; Karunakaran K; Thiyagarajan R
J Med Phys; 2016; 41(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 27217619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment Planning With Unflattened as Compared to Flattened Beams for Bilateral Carcinoma of the Breast.
Tamilarasu S; Saminathan M; Sharma SK; P A; Dewan A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2017 May; 18(5):1377-1381. PubMed ID: 28612590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinically relevant investigation of flattening filter-free skin dose.
Guy CL; Karki K; Sharma M; Kim S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):140-148. PubMed ID: 27929489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Monte Carlo comparison of superficial dose between flattening filter free and flattened beams.
Javedan K; Feygelman V; Zhang RR; Moros EG; Correa CR; Trotti A; Li W; Zhang GG
Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):503-8. PubMed ID: 24662096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
