These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25950081)

  • 1. "No man is an island": Effects of interpersonal proximity on spatial attention.
    Szpak A; Nicholls ME; Thomas NA; Laham SM; Loetscher T
    Cogn Neurosci; 2016; 7(1-4):45-54. PubMed ID: 25950081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Keeping your distance: attentional withdrawal in individuals who show physiological signs of social discomfort.
    Szpak A; Loetscher T; Churches O; Thomas NA; Spence CJ; Nicholls ME
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():462-7. PubMed ID: 25447057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Social modulation of spatial judgment: The case of line bisection task.
    D'Ascenzo S; Rubichi S; Di Gregorio G; Tommasi L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jun; 167():24-9. PubMed ID: 27089035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Out of your sight, out of my mind: Knowledge about another person's visual access modulates spontaneous visuospatial perspective-taking.
    Freundlieb M; Sebanz N; Kovács ÁM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jun; 43(6):1065-1072. PubMed ID: 28263631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of a coactor's focus of attention on task performance.
    Böckler A; Knoblich G; Sebanz N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Dec; 38(6):1404-15. PubMed ID: 22409143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Right hemisphere control of visuospatial attention in near space.
    Longo MR; Trippier S; Vagnoni E; Lourenco SF
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():350-7. PubMed ID: 25446963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Projecting one's own spatial bias onto others during a theory-of-mind task.
    Bio BJ; Webb TW; Graziano MSA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Feb; 115(7):E1684-E1689. PubMed ID: 29339513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Embodied and disembodied cognition: spatial perspective-taking.
    Tversky B; Hard BM
    Cognition; 2009 Jan; 110(1):124-9. PubMed ID: 19056081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Close interpersonal proximity modulates visuomotor processing of object affordances in shared, social space.
    Saccone EJ; Szpak A; Churches O; Nicholls MER
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):54-68. PubMed ID: 28864874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The physiological correlates of interpersonal space.
    Candini M; Battaglia S; Benassi M; di Pellegrino G; Frassinetti F
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):2611. PubMed ID: 33510396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Action ability modulates time-to-collision judgments.
    Vagnoni E; Andreanidou V; Lourenco SF; Longo MR
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Sep; 235(9):2729-2739. PubMed ID: 28608244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Functional representation of 3D space in endogenous attention shifts.
    Couyoumdjian A; Di Nocera F; Ferlazzo F
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Jan; 56(1):155-83. PubMed ID: 12587900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-related changes in attentional reference frames for peripersonal space.
    Bloesch EK; Davoli CC; Abrams RA
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Apr; 24(4):557-61. PubMed ID: 23426891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers.
    Zago L; Petit L; Jobard G; Hay J; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N; Karnath HO; Mellet E
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():75-83. PubMed ID: 27916670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bisecting the mental number line in near and far space.
    Longo MR; Lourenco SF
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 19951825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Paradoxical cross-over due to attention to high or low spatial frequencies.
    Niemeier M; Stojanoski B; Singh VW; Chu E
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Jun; 67(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 18243459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Space representation in children with dyslexia and children without dyslexia: contribution of line bisection and circle centering tasks.
    Vieira S; Quercia P; Bonnetblanc F; Michel C
    Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Nov; 34(11):3997-4008. PubMed ID: 24036389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The shape of personal space.
    Hecht H; Welsch R; Viehoff J; Longo MR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Feb; 193():113-122. PubMed ID: 30622020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No commonality between attentional capture and attentional blink.
    Kawahara JI; Kihara K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):991-1008. PubMed ID: 21113860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relationship between spatial cognition and walking trajectory for passing through a doorway: evident in individuals with dominant right eye?
    Kitayama S; Fujikake H; Kokubu M; Higuchi T
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 233(3):797-807. PubMed ID: 25432626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.