BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

46 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25950093)

  • 1. Predictive factors for positive or negative pathology in loop and laser conizations.
    Lambert B; Lepage Y
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 1998 Jul; 2(3):123-6. PubMed ID: 25950093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endocervical curettage in cervical evaluation.
    Lambert B; Lepage Y
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2000 Jul; 4(3):125-7. PubMed ID: 25951035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk Factor Analysis of Persistent High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion After Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Conization.
    Chen L; Liu L; Tao X; Guo L; Zhang H; Sui L
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2019 Jan; 23(1):24-27. PubMed ID: 30371553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: management and outcome.
    Azodi M; Chambers SK; Rutherford TJ; Kohorn EI; Schwartz PE; Chambers JT
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Jun; 73(3):348-53. PubMed ID: 10366458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Endocervical curettage, cone margins, and residual adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.
    Denehy TR; Gregori CA; Breen JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul; 90(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9207802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contribution of Exocervical Biopsy, Endocervical Curettage, and Colposcopic Grading in Diagnosing High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.
    Diedrich JT; Felix JC; Lonky NM
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2016 Jan; 20(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 24477170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP.
    Mathevet P; Dargent D; Roy M; Beau G
    Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Aug; 54(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 8063242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of cervical cytology and colposcopy in detecting cervical glandular neoplasia.
    Ullal A; Roberts M; Bulmer JN; Mathers ME; Wadehra V
    Cytopathology; 2009 Dec; 20(6):359-66. PubMed ID: 18557985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contribution of endocervical curettage in evaluating abnormal cervical cytology.
    Drescher CW; Peters WA; Roberts JA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Sep; 62(3):343-7. PubMed ID: 6877690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Colposcopy, cervicography, speculoscopy and endoscopy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
    van Niekerk WA; Dunton CJ; Richart RM; Hilgarth M; Kato H; Kaufman RH; Mango LJ; Nozawa S; Robinowitz M
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 9479322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk of significant gynaecological pathology in women with glandular neoplasia on cervical cytology.
    Talaat A; Brinkmann D; Dhundee J; Hana Y; Bevan J; Irvine R; Bailey S; Woolas R
    Cytopathology; 2012 Dec; 23(6):371-7. PubMed ID: 21749501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of residual neoplasia based on histopathology and margin status of conization specimens.
    Chang DY; Cheng WF; Torng PL; Chen RJ; Huang SC
    Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8898168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Conization with positive margins: what strategy should be adopted?].
    Bretelle F; Cravello L; Yang L; Benmoura D; Roger V; Blanc B
    Ann Chir; 2000 Jun; 125(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 10925486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Positive endocervical curettage in patients with satisfactory and unsatisfactory colposcopy: clinical implications.
    Krebs HB; Wheelock JB; Hurt WG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Apr; 69(4):601-5. PubMed ID: 3822303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Artifact in cervical LLETZ specimens: correlation with follow-up.
    Ioffe OB; Brooks SE; De Rezende RB; Silverberg SG
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 1999 Apr; 18(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 10202667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A retrospective analysis of the utility of endocervical curettage in screening population.
    Song Y; Zhao YQ; Li L; Pan QJ; Li N; Zhao FH; Chen W; Zhang X; Qiao YL
    Oncotarget; 2017 Jul; 8(30):50141-50147. PubMed ID: 28404931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Discussion on the diagnosis and treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in post-menopausal women].
    Cao QW; You ZX; Qian XY; Heng D; Tang MY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):393-398. PubMed ID: 31262123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictive value of cone margins and post-cone endocervical curettage with residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy.
    Husseinzadeh N; Shbaro I; Wesseler T
    Gynecol Oncol; 1989 May; 33(2):198-200. PubMed ID: 2703181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laser conization: follow-up in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in the cone margin.
    Andersen ES; Nielsen K; Larsen G
    Gynecol Oncol; 1990 Dec; 39(3):328-31. PubMed ID: 2258079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.