58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25950098)
1. Predicting risk factors for suboptimal excision in women undergoing cold-knife cone biopsy.
Massad LS; Chronopoulos FT; Meyer PM; Cejtin HE
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 1998 Jul; 2(3):144-7. PubMed ID: 25950098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Post-conization endocervical curettage for estimating the risk of persistent or recurrent high-grade dysplasia.
Shaco-Levy R; Meirovitz M; Eger G; Benharroch D; Dreiher J
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 121(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 23332656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinicopathologic variables predictive of residual dysplasia after cervical conization.
Schermerhorn TJ; Hodge J; Saltzman AK; Hackett TE; Sprance HE; Harrison TA
J Reprod Med; 1997 Apr; 42(4):189-92. PubMed ID: 9131490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The status and distance of cone biopsy margins as a predictor of excision adequacy for endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ.
Goldstein NS; Mani A
Am J Clin Pathol; 1998 Jun; 109(6):727-32. PubMed ID: 9620030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endocervical curettage at conization to predict residual cervical adenocarcinoma in situ.
Lea JS; Shin CH; Sheets EE; Coleman RL; Gehrig PA; Duska LR; Miller DS; Schorge JO
Gynecol Oncol; 2002 Oct; 87(1):129-32. PubMed ID: 12468353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endocervical curettage in cervical evaluation.
Lambert B; Lepage Y
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2000 Jul; 4(3):125-7. PubMed ID: 25951035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contribution of Exocervical Biopsy, Endocervical Curettage, and Colposcopic Grading in Diagnosing High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.
Diedrich JT; Felix JC; Lonky NM
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2016 Jan; 20(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 24477170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors That Influence Surgical Margin State in Patients Undergoing Cold Knife Conization - A Single Center Experience.
Aluloski I; Tanturovski M; Petrusevska G; Jovanovic R; Kostadinova-Kunovska S
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2017 Dec; 38(3):113-120. PubMed ID: 29668476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical conization of adenocarcinoma in situ: a predicting model of residual disease.
Tierney KE; Lin PS; Amezcua C; Matsuo K; Ye W; Felix JC; Roman LD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 210(4):366.e1-366.e5. PubMed ID: 24370689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Which Colposcopies Should Include Endocervical Curettage?
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Peterson P; Burchette RJ
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2015 Oct; 19(4):278-81. PubMed ID: 26083335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing endocervical curettage and endocervical brush at colposcopy.
Dunn TS; Stevens-Simon C; Moeller LD; Miekle S
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2000 Apr; 4(2):76-8. PubMed ID: 25950892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microcolposcopy vs. cone histology in evaluation of the endocervix in women with inadequate colposcopy or positive endocervical curettage.
Hunter V; Tseng P
J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):625-8. PubMed ID: 2810245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of endocervical curettage in colposcopy.
Linasmita V; Bullangpoti S; Rochanawutanon M; Bhamarapravati Y
J Med Assoc Thai; 1990 Feb; 73 Suppl 1():28-32. PubMed ID: 2351911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endocervical curettage, cone margins, and residual adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.
Denehy TR; Gregori CA; Breen JL
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul; 90(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9207802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors of Persistent or Recurrent Disease After Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure.
Cejtin HE; Zimmerman L; Mathews M; Patel A
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2017 Jan; 21(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 27824789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endocervical curettage: does it contribute to the management of patients with abnormal cervical cytology?
Oyer R; Hanjani P
Gynecol Oncol; 1986 Oct; 25(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 3758830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Endocervical curettage. Its use in the colposcopic assessment of a patient who has an abnormal cervico-vaginal smear].
Bergeron C
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1990; 19(8):989-94. PubMed ID: 2081876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictors of residual carcinoma or carcinoma-in-situ at hysterectomy following cervical conization with positive margins.
Diaz ES; Aoyama C; Baquing MA; Beavis A; Silva E; Holschneider C; Cass I
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 24262876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage?
Weitzman GA; Korhonen MO; Reeves KO; Irwin JF; Carter TS; Kaufman RH
J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Artifact in cervical LLETZ specimens: correlation with follow-up.
Ioffe OB; Brooks SE; De Rezende RB; Silverberg SG
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 1999 Apr; 18(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 10202667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
