BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

55 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25950347)

  • 1. The accuracy of colposcopic impression among women undergoing directed biopsy.
    Massad LS; Collins YC; Cejtin HE
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 1999 Jan; 3(1):57. PubMed ID: 25950347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The colposcopic impression. Is it influenced by the colposcopist's knowledge of the findings on the referral Papanicolaou smear?
    Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Zhang WH; Burchette RJ; Elson P; Qiao YL
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Aug; 46(8):724-8. PubMed ID: 11547646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Colposcopic proficiency-disease spectrum in a single family practice colposcopists' clinic.
    Brotzman GL; Schellhase KG
    WMJ; 2004; 103(7):61-5. PubMed ID: 15696836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Colposcopic accuracy in a residency training program: defining competency and proficiency.
    Ferris DG; Miller MD
    J Fam Pract; 1993 May; 36(5):515-20. PubMed ID: 8482935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlating Papanicolaou Smear, Colposcopic Impression, and Biopsy: Results from the Women's Interagency HIV Study.
    Massad LS; Schneider M; Watts H; Darragh T; Abulafia O; Salzer E; Muderspach LI; Sidawy M; Melnick S
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2001 Oct; 5(4):212-8. PubMed ID: 17050978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy: a 17-year experience.
    Economos K; Perez Veridiano N; Delke I; Collado ML; Tancer ML
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):915-8. PubMed ID: 8497355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inappropriate gold standard bias in cervical cancer screening studies.
    Pretorius RG; Bao YP; Belinson JL; Burchette RJ; Smith JS; Qiao YL
    Int J Cancer; 2007 Nov; 121(10):2218-24. PubMed ID: 17657715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of colposcopy directed biopsies and cold knife conization in patients with abnormal cytology.
    Hovadhanakul P; Mehra U; Terragno A; Taylor HB; Cavanagh D
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1976 Mar; 142(3):333-6. PubMed ID: 1251312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Colposcopic evaluation of patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
    Benedet JL; Boyes DA; Nichols TM; Millner A
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1976 Mar; 83(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 1252383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of colposcopic accuracy in diagnosis of cervical neoplasia.
    Srisomboon J; Tangchaitrong CA; Bhusawang Y; Chairatana A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1996 Jul; 79(7):423-8. PubMed ID: 8855620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Histologic findings after a colposcopic biopsy showing CIN2.
    Massad LS; Collins YC; Cejtin HE
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2002 Jan; 6(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 17050988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A quality-control program for colposcopic practice.
    Benedet JL; Anderson GH; Matisic JP; Miller DM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):872-5. PubMed ID: 1923214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Punch biopsy guided by both colposcopy and HR-HPV status is more efficient for identification of immediate high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse among HPV-infected women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
    Ding Z; Li Y; Chen A; Song M; Zhang Y
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Dec; 207():32-36. PubMed ID: 27816739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
    Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting absolute risk of CIN3 during post-colposcopic follow-up: results from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS).
    Walker JL; Wang SS; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 195(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 16890545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Histological differences between colposcopic-directed biopsy and loop excision of the transformation zone (LETZ): a cause for concern.
    Chappatte OA; Byrne DL; Raju KS; Nayagam M; Kenney A
    Gynecol Oncol; 1991 Oct; 43(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 1959787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using the cone biopsy to compare colposcopy clinics in new york and london.
    Stier E; Freeman-Wang T; Hochberg L; Hummer A; Venkatraman E; Walker P
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2004 Apr; 8(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 15874847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pathology of colposcopic findings in 2635 diethylstilbestrol-exposed young women.
    Welch WR; Robboy SJ; Kaufman RH; Townsend D; Noller KL; Gundersen J; Lawrence WD; Richart RM; O'Brien P; McGorray S
    Gynecol Oncol; 1985 Jul; 21(3):277-86. PubMed ID: 4007608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic colposcopic accuracy by the gynocular and a stationary colposcope.
    Kallner HK; Persson M; Thuresson M; Altman D; Shemer I; Thorsell M; Shemer EA
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015 Jan; 31(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 26063001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benefits and risks of directed biopsy in pregnancy.
    Baldauf JJ; Dreyfus M; Ritter J
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 1997 Oct; 1(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 25951206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.