69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25951035)
21. Comparing endocervical curettage and endocervical brush at colposcopy.
Dunn TS; Stevens-Simon C; Moeller LD; Miekle S
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2000 Apr; 4(2):76-8. PubMed ID: 25950892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnostic Three Slides Pap Test Compared to Punch Biopsy and Endocervical Curettage in Confirmed HSIL+ Diagnosis.
Rubeša-Mihaljević R; Vrdoljak-Mozetič D; Dinter M; Verša Ostojić D; Štemberger-Papić S; Klarić M
Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 34070458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Histopathological variables predicting high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions after large-loop excision of the transformation zone.
Barnes MN; Robertson MW; Naumann RW; Roland PY; Alvarez RD; Kilgore LC; Partridge EE
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 1998 Apr; 2(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 25951467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessment of endocervical curettage in colposcopy.
Linasmita V; Bullangpoti S; Rochanawutanon M; Bhamarapravati Y
J Med Assoc Thai; 1990 Feb; 73 Suppl 1():28-32. PubMed ID: 2351911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Laser conization: follow-up in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in the cone margin.
Andersen ES; Nielsen K; Larsen G
Gynecol Oncol; 1990 Dec; 39(3):328-31. PubMed ID: 2258079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage?
Weitzman GA; Korhonen MO; Reeves KO; Irwin JF; Carter TS; Kaufman RH
J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Predictive value of a positive endocervical curettage in diagnosis and treatment of CIN.
Kwikkel HJ; Bezemer PD; Helmerhorst TJ; Quaak MJ; Stolk JG
Gynecol Oncol; 1986 Jun; 24(2):162-70. PubMed ID: 3710263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Correlations between unsatisfactory colposcopy, cytology, and biopsy in patients with cervical abnormalities.
Lambert B; Lepage Y
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007 Oct; 86(10):1269-72. PubMed ID: 17851823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Clinical significance of endocervical curettage (ECC) in predicting neoplastic lesions of the cervix].
Toki T; Fujii S; Yajima A
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Mar; 46(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 8133138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Lack of Agreement Between Endocervical Brush and Endocervical Curettage in Women Undergoing Repeat Endocervical Sampling.
Doo DW; Stickrath EH; Mazzoni SE; Alston MJ
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2016 Oct; 20(4):296-9. PubMed ID: 27518843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Should endocervical curettage routinely be performed at the time of colposcopy? A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Shepherd JP; Guido R; Lowder JL
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2014 Apr; 18(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 24270197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of Colposcopically Guided Diagnostic Methods for the Detection of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.
Müller K; Soergel P; Hillemanns P; Jentschke M
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 2016 Feb; 76(2):182-187. PubMed ID: 26941452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Optimizing the Detection of Occult Cervical Cancer: A Prospective Multicentre Study in China.
Li Y; Gong YX; Wang Q; Gao S; Zhang H; Xie F; Cong Q; Chen L; Zhou Q; Hong Z; Qiu L; Li F; Xie Y; Sui L
Int J Womens Health; 2021; 13():1005-1015. PubMed ID: 34737649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Development and validation of a clinical prediction model for endocervical curettage decision-making in cervical lesions.
Li Y; Luo H; Zhang X; Chang J; Zhao Y; Li J; Li D; Wang W
BMC Cancer; 2021 Jul; 21(1):804. PubMed ID: 34253177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of the cervical canal with the endocervical brush.
Hoffman MS; Sterghos S; Gordy LW; Gunasekaran S; Cavanagh D
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):573-7. PubMed ID: 8377985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Endocervical curettage in the evaluation of cervical disease in patients with adequate colposcopy.
Soisson AP; Molina CY; Benson WL
Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jan; 71(1):109-11. PubMed ID: 3336531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Predictive value of cone margins and post-cone endocervical curettage with residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy.
Husseinzadeh N; Shbaro I; Wesseler T
Gynecol Oncol; 1989 May; 33(2):198-200. PubMed ID: 2703181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Endocervical curettage. Its use in the colposcopic assessment of a patient who has an abnormal cervico-vaginal smear].
Bergeron C
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1990; 19(8):989-94. PubMed ID: 2081876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Predicting risk factors for suboptimal excision in women undergoing cold-knife cone biopsy.
Massad LS; Chronopoulos FT; Meyer PM; Cejtin HE
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 1998 Jul; 2(3):144-7. PubMed ID: 25950098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
