420 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25951138)
1. Beauty matters: social preferences in a three-person ultimatum game.
Ma Q; Hu Y
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125806. PubMed ID: 25951138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hello handsome! Male's facial attractiveness gives rise to female's fairness bias in Ultimatum Game scenarios-An ERP study.
Ma Q; Qian D; Hu L; Wang L
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180459. PubMed ID: 28678888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The undermining effect of facial attractiveness on brain responses to fairness in the Ultimatum Game: an ERP study.
Ma Q; Hu Y; Jiang S; Meng L
Front Neurosci; 2015; 9():77. PubMed ID: 25805967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of facial attractiveness and alleged personality traits on fairness decisions in the ultimatum game: Evidence from ERPs.
Li T; Liang Z; Yuan Y; Sommer W; Li W
Biol Psychol; 2024 Jul; 190():108809. PubMed ID: 38718883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Beauty premium: Event-related potentials evidence of how physical attractiveness matters in online peer-to-peer lending.
Jin J; Fan B; Dai S; Ma Q
Neurosci Lett; 2017 Feb; 640():130-135. PubMed ID: 28111351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study.
Wang G; Li J; Li Z; Wei M; Li S
Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():38-46. PubMed ID: 26930614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Beauty affects fairness: facial attractiveness alters neural responses to unfairness in the ultimatum game.
Pan Y; Jin J; Wan Y; Wu Y; Wang F; Xu S; Zhu L; Xu J; Rao H
Brain Imaging Behav; 2022 Dec; 16(6):2497-2505. PubMed ID: 35821158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrophysiological correlates of processing facial attractiveness and its influence on cooperative behavior.
Chen J; Zhong J; Zhang Y; Li P; Zhang A; Tan Q; Li H
Neurosci Lett; 2012 May; 517(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 22410307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity.
Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; do Egito JHT; Boggio PS
Soc Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 12(5):530-540. PubMed ID: 27237685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do we care about the powerless third? An ERP study of the three-person ultimatum game.
Alexopoulos J; Pfabigan DM; Lamm C; Bauer H; Fischmeister FP
Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():59. PubMed ID: 22470328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A premium for positive social interest and attractive voices in the acceptability of unfair offers? An ERP study.
Yuan Y; Shang J; Gao C; Sommer W; Li W
Eur J Neurosci; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38777332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impaired social cognition in schizophrenia during the Ultimatum Game: An EEG study.
Horat SK; Favre G; Prévot A; Ventura J; Herrmann FR; Gothuey I; Merlo MCG; Missonnier P
Schizophr Res; 2018 Feb; 192():308-316. PubMed ID: 28578921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Social comparisons differentially affect fair and unfair processing in ultimatum bargaining.
Li Q; Dai W; Zheng Y; Wang C; Yang Z; Ren Q; Hu K; Liu X
Neuropsychologia; 2022 Sep; 174():108318. PubMed ID: 35830915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Counterfactual comparison modulates fairness consideration in the mini-ultimatum game: an event-related potentials study.
Liang J; Lin H; Xiang J; Wu H; Li X; Liang H; Zheng X
Scand J Psychol; 2015 Apr; 56(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 25586113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Role of Sex in the Effect of Vocal Attractiveness on Ultimatum Game Decisions.
Shang J; Liu CH
Behav Sci (Basel); 2023 May; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 37232670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. You did not mean it: Perceived good intentions alleviate sense of unfairness.
Ma Q; Meng L; Zhang Z; Xu Q; Wang Y; Shen Q
Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jun; 96(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 25863263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Social exclusion modulates fairness consideration in the ultimatum game: an ERP study.
Qu C; Wang Y; Huang Y
Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():505. PubMed ID: 23986686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Social value orientation modulates context-based social comparison preference in the outcome evaluation: An ERP study.
Qi Y; Wu H; Raiha S; Liu X
Neuropsychologia; 2018 Apr; 112():135-144. PubMed ID: 29501790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Behavioral and neuronal determinants of negative reciprocity in the ultimatum game.
Kaltwasser L; Hildebrandt A; Wilhelm O; Sommer W
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1608-17. PubMed ID: 27261490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rejection in Bargaining Situations: An Event-Related Potential Study in Adolescents and Adults.
Zanolie K; de Cremer D; Güroğlu B; Crone EA
PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139953. PubMed ID: 26445134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
