BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

420 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25951138)

  • 21. What do we expect from a beauty? Facial attractiveness of the opposite sex gives rise to discrepancies in males' anticipation and demand.
    Pei G; Meng L
    Int J Psychol; 2018 Dec; 53(6):411-416. PubMed ID: 27658937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Agency matters! Social preferences in the three-person ultimatum game.
    Alexopoulos J; Pfabigan DM; Göschl F; Bauer H; Fischmeister FP
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():312. PubMed ID: 23818878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dissociation between medial frontal negativity and cardiac responses in the ultimatum game: Effects of offer size and fairness.
    Van der Veen FM; Sahibdin PP
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 11(4):516-25. PubMed ID: 21786030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influences of State and Trait Affect on Behavior, Feedback-Related Negativity, and P3b in the Ultimatum Game.
    Riepl K; Mussel P; Osinsky R; Hewig J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146358. PubMed ID: 26742103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lower dorsal striatum activation in association with neuroticism during the acceptance of unfair offers.
    Servaas MN; Aleman A; Marsman JB; Renken RJ; Riese H; Ormel J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 15(3):537-52. PubMed ID: 25720857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Altered economic decision-making in abstinent heroin addicts: Evidence from the ultimatum game.
    Hou Y; Zhao L; Yao Q; Ding L
    Neurosci Lett; 2016 Aug; 627():148-54. PubMed ID: 27264486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sex and the money--How gender stereotypes modulate economic decision-making: An ERP study.
    Fabre EF; Causse M; Pesciarelli F; Cacciari C
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():221-32. PubMed ID: 26102185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Vocal Attractiveness Matters: Social Preferences in Cooperative Behavior.
    Shang J; Liu Z
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():877530. PubMed ID: 35693505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Being the chosen one: social inclusion modulates decisions in the ultimatum game. An ERP study.
    Falco A; Albinet C; Rattat AC; Paul I; Fabre E
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2019 Feb; 14(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 30608613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Moral transgression modulates fairness considerations in the ultimatum game: Evidence from ERP and EEG data.
    Chen T; Tang R; Yang X; Peng M; Cai M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2023 Jun; 188():1-11. PubMed ID: 36889599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Preference and strategy in proposer's prosocial giving in the ultimatum game.
    Inaba M; Inoue Y; Akutsu S; Takahashi N; Yamagishi T
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193877. PubMed ID: 29505587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A neural signature of the creation of social evaluation.
    Osinsky R; Mussel P; Ohrlein L; Hewig J
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 Jun; 9(6):731-6. PubMed ID: 23547246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fairness influences early signatures of reward-related neural processing.
    Massi B; Luhmann CC
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 15(4):768-75. PubMed ID: 25962511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Irrational economic decision-making after ventromedial prefrontal damage: evidence from the Ultimatum Game.
    Koenigs M; Tranel D
    J Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 27(4):951-6. PubMed ID: 17251437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Proposer's moral identity modulates fairness processing in the ultimatum game: Evidence from behavior and brain potentials.
    Fan C; Wang H; Liu D; Sun J; Han F; He W
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2024 Jul; 201():112360. PubMed ID: 38735630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perceived relative social status and cognitive load influence acceptance of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game.
    Harris A; Young A; Hughson L; Green D; Doan SN; Hughson E; Reed CL
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227717. PubMed ID: 31917806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intention affects fairness processing: Evidence from behavior and representational similarity analysis of event-related potential signals.
    Xu Q; Hu J; Qin Y; Li G; Zhang X; Li P
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2023 Apr; 44(6):2451-2464. PubMed ID: 36749642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Social value orientation modulates fairness processing during social decision-making: evidence from behavior and brain potentials.
    Hu X; Mai X
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2021 Jul; 16(7):670-682. PubMed ID: 33769539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The neural correlate of mid-value offers in ultimatum game.
    Zhong X; Wang R; Huang S; Chen J; Chen H; Qu C
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220622. PubMed ID: 31430295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Gender differences in memory processing of female facial attractiveness: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Zhang Y; Wei B; Zhao P; Zheng M; Zhang L
    Neurocase; 2016 Jun; 22(3):317-23. PubMed ID: 26928269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.