184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25952323)
1. Comparison of two different mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis.
Zhou D; Liu QX; Deng XF; Min JX; Dai JG
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 May; 10():67. PubMed ID: 25952323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Deng XF; Liu QX; Zhou D; Min JX; Dai JG
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 21(15):4757-64. PubMed ID: 25914488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Linear- versus circular-stapled esophagogastric anastomosis during esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Aiolfi A; Sozzi A; Bonitta G; Lombardo F; Cavalli M; Cirri S; Campanelli G; Danelli P; Bona D
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Dec; 407(8):3297-3309. PubMed ID: 36242619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Handsewn or stapled esophagogastric anastomoses after esophagectomy for cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Urschel JD; Blewett CJ; Bennett WF; Miller JD; Young JE
Dis Esophagus; 2001; 14(3-4):212-7. PubMed ID: 11869322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Postoperative complications analysis of circular stapled versus linear stapled anastomosis for patients undergoing esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gu HY; Luo J; Qiang Y
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Aug; 18(1):242. PubMed ID: 37559141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Honda M; Kuriyama A; Noma H; Nunobe S; Furukawa TA
Ann Surg; 2013 Feb; 257(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 23001084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Hand-sewn Versus Side-to-side Linear-stapled Versus Circular-stapled Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Schlottmann F; Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Casas MA; Herbella FAM; Patti MG
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2022 Jun; 32(3):380-392. PubMed ID: 35583556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anastomotic leak and stricture after hand-sewn versus linear-stapled intrathoracic oesophagogastric anastomosis: single-centre analysis of 415 oesophagectomies.
Harustiak T; Pazdro A; Snajdauf M; Stolz A; Lischke R
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1650-9. PubMed ID: 26574497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies.
Price TN; Nichols FC; Harmsen WS; Allen MS; Cassivi SD; Wigle DA; Shen KR; Deschamps C
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 95(4):1154-60; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 23395626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis.
Orringer MB; Marshall B; Iannettoni MD
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2000 Feb; 119(2):277-88. PubMed ID: 10649203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Which Anastomotic Techniques Is the Best Choice for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.
Chen B; Xia P; Tang W; Huang S
J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Feb; 27(2):422-432. PubMed ID: 36417036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of total mechanical stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a comparison to conventional anastomotic techniques.
Santos RS; Raftopoulos Y; Singh D; DeHoyos A; Fernando HC; Keenan RJ; Luketich JD; Landreneau RJ
Surgery; 2004 Oct; 136(4):917-25. PubMed ID: 15467679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis in esophageal cancer: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang Y; Zhang X; Jiang Y; Ma G; Wang Z; Xue X; Sang S; Zhang L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(23):e15676. PubMed ID: 31169669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis.
Blackmon SH; Correa AM; Wynn B; Hofstetter WL; Martin LW; Mehran RJ; Rice DC; Swisher SG; Walsh GL; Roth JA; Vaporciyan AA
Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 May; 83(5):1805-13; discussion 1813. PubMed ID: 17462404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Omentoplasty for esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy.
Yuan Y; Zeng X; Hu Y; Xie T; Zhao Y
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11():CD008446. PubMed ID: 23152259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.
Kondra J; Ong SR; Clifton J; Evans K; Finley RJ; Yee J
Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Linear- Versus Circular-Stapled Esophagojejunostomy During Total Gastrectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Sozzi A; Aiolfi A; Matsushima K; Bonitta G; Lombardo F; Viti M; Russo A; Campanelli G; Bona D
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2023 Jun; 33(6):524-533. PubMed ID: 37057962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Totally mechanical Collard versus circular stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis for minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Liu H; Shan L; Wang J; Zhai R; Zhu Y; Yao F
Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):891-901. PubMed ID: 36038647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Law S; Fok M; Chu KM; Wong J
Ann Surg; 1997 Aug; 226(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 9296510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
