BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25952617)

  • 1. Comparing visual inspection, aerobic colony counts, and adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay for evaluating surface cleanliness at a medical center.
    Huang YS; Chen YC; Chen ML; Cheng A; Hung IC; Wang JT; Sheng WH; Chang SC
    Am J Infect Control; 2015 Aug; 43(8):882-6. PubMed ID: 25952617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monitoring the effectiveness of hospital cleaning practices by use of an adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay.
    Boyce JM; Havill NL; Dumigan DG; Golebiewski M; Balogun O; Rizvani R
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 30(7):678-84. PubMed ID: 19489715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The adenosine triphosphate method as a quality control tool to assess 'cleanliness' of frequently touched hospital surfaces.
    Knape L; Hambraeus A; Lytsy B
    J Hosp Infect; 2015 Oct; 91(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 26213368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ATP bioluminescence assay for evaluating cleaning practices in operating theatres: applicability and limitations.
    Sanna T; Dallolio L; Raggi A; Mazzetti M; Lorusso G; Zanni A; Farruggia P; Leoni E
    BMC Infect Dis; 2018 Nov; 18(1):583. PubMed ID: 30453892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic assessment of different environmental cleaning monitoring methods.
    Luick L; Thompson PA; Loock MH; Vetter SL; Cook J; Guerrero DM
    Am J Infect Control; 2013 Aug; 41(8):751-2. PubMed ID: 23380380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of a fluorescent marker with quantitative bioburden methods to assess cleanliness.
    Hung IC; Chang HY; Cheng A; Chen AC; Ting L; Chen MW; Lai YH; Sheng WH
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2018 Nov; 39(11):1296-1300. PubMed ID: 30221609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence to assess the efficacy of a modified cleaning program implemented within an intensive care setting.
    Moore G; Smyth D; Singleton J; Wilson P
    Am J Infect Control; 2010 Oct; 38(8):617-22. PubMed ID: 20605265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of fluorescent marker systems with 2 quantitative methods of assessing terminal cleaning practices.
    Boyce JM; Havill NL; Havill HL; Mangione E; Dumigan DG; Moore BA
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 32(12):1187-93. PubMed ID: 22080657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing visual inspection and performance observation for evaluation of hospital cleanliness.
    Chen YC; Huang HM; Lin PY; Shi ZY
    Am J Infect Control; 2021 Dec; 49(12):1511-1514. PubMed ID: 34314756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monitoring the effectiveness of cleaning in four British hospitals.
    Cooper RA; Griffith CJ; Malik RE; Obee P; Looker N
    Am J Infect Control; 2007 Jun; 35(5):338-41. PubMed ID: 17577482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What Orthopaedic Operating Room Surfaces Are Contaminated With Bioburden? A Study Using the ATP Bioluminescence Assay.
    Richard RD; Bowen TR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jul; 475(7):1819-1824. PubMed ID: 28050814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finding a benchmark for monitoring hospital cleanliness.
    Mulvey D; Redding P; Robertson C; Woodall C; Kingsmore P; Bedwell D; Dancer SJ
    J Hosp Infect; 2011 Jan; 77(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 21129820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Applicability of the ATP assay in monitoring the cleanliness of hospital environments.
    Ishino N; Miyaji C; Ogata M; Inada M; Nagata M; Shimamoto M
    Infect Dis Health; 2024 Feb; 29(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 37989685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the effectiveness of surface cleaning methods in intravitreal injection procedure rooms.
    Amin SR; Folkert CM; Erie JC
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Jan; 121(1):276-282. PubMed ID: 24112945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of a Sampling Area-Adjusted Adenosine Triphosphate Bioluminescence Assay Based on Digital Image Quantification to Assess the Cleanliness of Hospital Surfaces.
    Ho YH; Wang LS; Jiang HL; Chang CH; Hsieh CJ; Chang DC; Tu HY; Chiu TY; Chao HJ; Tseng CC
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Jun; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 27294944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monitoring the effectiveness of daily cleaning practices in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting using an adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence assay.
    Deshpande A; Dunn AN; Fox J; Cadnum JL; Mana TSC; Jencson A; Fraser TG; Donskey CJ; Gordon SM
    Am J Infect Control; 2020 Jul; 48(7):757-760. PubMed ID: 31883729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of ATP bioluminescence to assess hospital cleaning: a review.
    Nante N; Ceriale E; Messina G; Lenzi D; Manzi P
    J Prev Med Hyg; 2017 Jun; 58(2):E177-E183. PubMed ID: 28900359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A modified ATP benchmark for evaluating the cleaning of some hospital environmental surfaces.
    Lewis T; Griffith C; Gallo M; Weinbren M
    J Hosp Infect; 2008 Jun; 69(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 18468725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adenosine tri-phosphate (ATP)-based cleaning monitoring in health care: how rapidly does environmental ATP deteriorate?
    Alfa MJ; Olson N; Murray BL
    J Hosp Infect; 2015 May; 90(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 25794441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analytical performance issues: comparison of ATP bioluminescence and aerobic bacterial count for evaluating surface cleanliness in an Italian hospital.
    Amodio E; Cannova L; Villafrate MR; Merendino AM; Aprea L; Calamusa G
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2014; 11(2):D23-7. PubMed ID: 24369935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.