These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25952855)

  • 1. Fish species substitution and misnaming in South Africa: An economic, safety and sustainability conundrum revisited.
    Cawthorn DM; Duncan J; Kastern C; Francis J; Hoffman LC
    Food Chem; 2015 Oct; 185():165-81. PubMed ID: 25952855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survey of mislabelling across finfish supply chain reveals mislabelling both outside and within Canada.
    Shehata HR; Bourque D; Steinke D; Chen S; Hanner R
    Food Res Int; 2019 Jul; 121():723-729. PubMed ID: 31108801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Could do better! A high school market survey of fish labelling in Sydney, Australia, using DNA barcodes.
    Mitchell A; Rothbart A; Frankham G; Johnson RN; Neaves LE
    PeerJ; 2019; 7():e7138. PubMed ID: 31231598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An economic analysis of private incentives to adopt DNA barcoding technology for fish species authentication in Canada.
    Ugochukwu AI; Hobbs JE; Phillips PW; Gray R
    Genome; 2015 Dec; 58(12):559-67. PubMed ID: 26577715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. FISH-BOL and seafood identification: geographically dispersed case studies reveal systemic market substitution across Canada.
    Hanner R; Becker S; Ivanova NV; Steinke D
    Mitochondrial DNA; 2011 Oct; 22 Suppl 1():106-22. PubMed ID: 21980986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Seafood label quality and mislabelling rates hamper consumer choices for sustainability in Australia.
    Cundy ME; Santana-Garcon J; McLennan AG; Ayad ME; Bayer PE; Cooper M; Corrigan S; Harrison E; Wilcox C
    Sci Rep; 2023 Aug; 13(1):10146. PubMed ID: 37537170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. DNA barcoding of fish species reveals low rate of package mislabeling in Qatar.
    Chen KC; Zakaria D; Altarawneh H; Andrews GN; Ganesan GS; John KM; Khan S; Ladumor H
    Genome; 2019 Feb; 62(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 30742542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fish product mislabelling: failings of traceability in the production chain and implications for illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing.
    Helyar SJ; Lloyd HA; de Bruyn M; Leake J; Bennett N; Carvalho GR
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e98691. PubMed ID: 24921655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using DNA barcoding to track seafood mislabeling in Los Angeles restaurants.
    Willette DA; Simmonds SE; Cheng SH; Esteves S; Kane TL; Nuetzel H; Pilaud N; Rachmawati R; Barber PH
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Oct; 31(5):1076-1085. PubMed ID: 28075039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DNA barcoding detected improper labelling and supersession of crab food served by restaurants in India.
    Vartak VR; Narasimmalu R; Annam PK; Singh DP; Lakra WS
    J Sci Food Agric; 2015 Jan; 95(2):359-66. PubMed ID: 24796530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A glimpse into the genetic diversity of the Peruvian seafood sector: Unveiling species substitution, mislabeling and trade of threatened species.
    Marín A; Serna J; Robles C; Ramírez B; Reyes-Flores LE; Zelada-Mázmela E; Sotil G; Alfaro R
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206596. PubMed ID: 30444869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sushi barcoding in the UK: another kettle of fish.
    Vandamme SG; Griffiths AM; Taylor SA; Di Muri C; Hankard EA; Towne JA; Watson M; Mariani S
    PeerJ; 2016; 4():e1891. PubMed ID: 27069819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. DNA-based techniques for seafood species authentication.
    Silva AJ; Hellberg RS
    Adv Food Nutr Res; 2021; 95():207-255. PubMed ID: 33745513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of DNA barcoding to reveal species composition of convenience seafood.
    Huxley-Jones E; Shaw JL; Fletcher C; Parnell J; Watts PC
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Apr; 26(2):367-71. PubMed ID: 22268756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DNA barcoding validates species labelling of certified seafood.
    Barendse J; Roel A; Longo C; Andriessen L; Webster LMI; Ogden R; Neat F
    Curr Biol; 2019 Mar; 29(6):R198-R199. PubMed ID: 30889387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of a fast DNA extraction method for sea food and marine species identification.
    Tagliavia M; Nicosia A; Salamone M; Biondo G; Bennici CD; Mazzola S; Cuttitta A
    Food Chem; 2016 Jul; 203():375-378. PubMed ID: 26948627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fish mislabelling in France: substitution rates and retail types.
    Bénard-Capelle J; Guillonneau V; Nouvian C; Fournier N; Le Loët K; Dettai A
    PeerJ; 2015; 2():e714. PubMed ID: 28462014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. DNA barcoding reveals global and local influences on patterns of mislabeling and substitution in the trade of fish in Mexico.
    Munguia-Vega A; Terrazas-Tapia R; Dominguez-Contreras JF; Reyna-Fabian M; Zapata-Morales P
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0265960. PubMed ID: 35421106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An indirect ELISA and a PCR technique for the detection of Grouper (Epinephelus marginatus) mislabeling.
    Asensio L; González I; Pavón MA; García T; Martín R
    Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess; 2008 Jun; 25(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 18484296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Establishment of a mitochondrial DNA sequence database for the identification of fish species commercially available in South Africa.
    Cawthorn DM; Steinman HA; Witthuhn RC
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2011 Nov; 11(6):979-91. PubMed ID: 21689383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.