These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Derivation of biomonitoring equivalent (BE) values for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and related compounds: a screening tool for interpretation of biomonitoring data in a risk assessment context. Aylward LL; Lakind JS; Hays SM J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2008; 71(22):1499-508. PubMed ID: 18836925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ecological models in ecotoxicology and ecological risk assessment: an introduction to the special section. Galic N; Forbes V Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Jul; 33(7):1446-8. PubMed ID: 24939604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The implications of hormesis to ecotoxicology and ecological risk assessment. Chapman PM Hum Exp Toxicol; 2001 Oct; 20(10):499-505. PubMed ID: 11858510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Field surveys can support ecological risk assessment. Iwasaki Y; Kagaya T; Ormerod SJ Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jan; 9(1):171-2. PubMed ID: 23281239 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Toxicity profiling: An integrated effect-based tool for site-specific sediment quality assessment. Hamers T; Leonards PE; Legler J; Vethaak AD; Schipper CA Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Oct; 6(4):761-73. PubMed ID: 20872654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Future needs and recommendations in the development of species sensitivity distributions: Estimating toxicity thresholds for aquatic ecological communities and assessing impacts of chemical exposures. Belanger S; Barron M; Craig P; Dyer S; Galay-Burgos M; Hamer M; Marshall S; Posthuma L; Raimondo S; Whitehouse P Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):664-674. PubMed ID: 27531323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Association of dioxins, furans and dioxin-like PCBs in human blood with nephropathy among US teens and young adults. Everett CJ; Thompson OM Rev Environ Health; 2016 Jun; 31(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 26982604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of toxic equivalent quantity of dioxins in human milk using different toxicity equivalence factors. Saito K; Ohmura A; Takekuma M; Fukui M; Iwasaki Y; Ito R; Matsuki Y; Nakazawa H Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2006 Apr; 76(4):641-7. PubMed ID: 16688547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The use of cholinesterases in ecotoxicology. Nunes B Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2011; 212():29-59. PubMed ID: 21432054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Environmental health risk assessment of dioxin exposure through foods in a dioxin hot spot-Bien Hoa City, Vietnam. Tuyet-Hanh TT; Vu-Anh L; Ngoc-Bich N; Tenkate T Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2010 May; 7(5):2395-406. PubMed ID: 20623031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of dioxin exposure in Eisenia andrei: integration of biomarker data by an Expert System to rank the development of pollutant-induced stress syndrome in earthworms. Sforzini S; Dagnino A; Oliveri L; Canesi L; Viarengo A Chemosphere; 2011 Oct; 85(6):934-42. PubMed ID: 21777938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Ecotoxicology and macroecology--time for integration. Beketov MA; Liess M Environ Pollut; 2012 Mar; 162():247-54. PubMed ID: 22243871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The 2022 revised WHO TEFs for dioxins and dioxin-like chemicals: The importance of considering the use of species-specific information to determine relative effective potency for human-based risk assessment. Eaton DL; Simon TW; Kaminski NE; Perdew GH; Nebert DW Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2024 May; 149():105599. PubMed ID: 38490576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Systematic analysis and overall toxicity evaluation of dioxins and hexachlorobenzene in human milk. Saito K; Ogawa M; Takekuma M; Ohmura A; Kawaguchi M; Ito R; Inoue K; Matsuki Y; Nakazawa H Chemosphere; 2005 Dec; 61(9):1215-20. PubMed ID: 15946723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of age, gender and regional concentration differences for dioxin-like chemicals in the Australian population. Harden FA; Toms LM; Paepke O; Ryan JJ; Müller JF Chemosphere; 2007 Apr; 67(9):S318-24. PubMed ID: 17258280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The role of persistence in chemical evaluations. Mackay D; Hughes DM; Romano ML; Bonnell M Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2014 Oct; 10(4):588-94. PubMed ID: 24753402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Basis for a proposed reference dose (RfD) for dioxin of 1-10 pg/kg-day: a weight of evidence evaluation of the human and animal studies. Greene JF; Hays S; Paustenbach D J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(2):115-59. PubMed ID: 12554432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of ecological risk from bioaccumulation of PCDD/Fs and dioxin-like PCBs in a coastal lagoon. Micheletti C; Critto A; Marcomini A Environ Int; 2007 Jan; 33(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 16914204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Improving substance information in USEtox Saouter E; Aschberger K; Fantke P; Hauschild MZ; Kienzler A; Paini A; Pant R; Radovnikovic A; Secchi M; Sala S Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 Dec; 36(12):3463-3470. PubMed ID: 28671290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]