2573 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25953784)
1. Mendelian randomization studies: a review of the approaches used and the quality of reporting.
Boef AG; Dekkers OM; le Cessie S
Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):496-511. PubMed ID: 25953784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the current state of Mendelian randomization studies: a protocol for a systematic review on methodological and clinical aspects using neurodegenerative disorders as outcome.
Grover S; Del Greco M F; König IR
Syst Rev; 2018 Sep; 7(1):145. PubMed ID: 30249280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Credible Mendelian randomization studies: approaches for evaluating the instrumental variable assumptions.
Glymour MM; Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ; Robins JM
Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 175(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 22247045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigating the transparency of reporting in two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization studies using the MR-Base platform.
Woolf B; Di Cara N; Moreno-Stokoe C; Skrivankova V; Drax K; Higgins JPT; Hemani G; Munafò MR; Davey Smith G; Yarmolinsky J; Richmond RC
Int J Epidemiol; 2022 Dec; 51(6):1943-1956. PubMed ID: 35383846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mendelian randomisation approaches to the study of prenatal exposures: A systematic review.
Diemer EW; Labrecque JA; Neumann A; Tiemeier H; Swanson SA
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2021 Jan; 35(1):130-142. PubMed ID: 32779786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of non-differential measurement error on bias, precision and power in Mendelian randomization studies.
Pierce BL; VanderWeele TJ
Int J Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 41(5):1383-93. PubMed ID: 23045203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Using Mendelian Randomization: The STROBE-MR Statement.
Skrivankova VW; Richmond RC; Woolf BAR; Yarmolinsky J; Davies NM; Swanson SA; VanderWeele TJ; Higgins JPT; Timpson NJ; Dimou N; Langenberg C; Golub RM; Loder EW; Gallo V; Tybjaerg-Hansen A; Davey Smith G; Egger M; Richards JB
JAMA; 2021 Oct; 326(16):1614-1621. PubMed ID: 34698778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reporting methodological issues of the mendelian randomization studies in health and medical research: a systematic review.
Islam SN; Ahammed T; Anjum A; Albalawi O; Uddin MJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jan; 22(1):21. PubMed ID: 35034628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Power and sample size calculations for Mendelian randomization studies using one genetic instrument.
Freeman G; Cowling BJ; Schooling CM
Int J Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 42(4):1157-63. PubMed ID: 23934314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization: A review.
Bowden J; Holmes MV
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Dec; 10(4):486-496. PubMed ID: 30861319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tools for assessing quality and risk of bias in Mendelian randomization studies: a systematic review.
Spiga F; Gibson M; Dawson S; Tilling K; Davey Smith G; Munafò MR; Higgins JPT
Int J Epidemiol; 2023 Feb; 52(1):227-249. PubMed ID: 35900265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Mendelian randomization approach, used for causal inferences].
Wang LN; Zhang Z
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 38(4):547-552. PubMed ID: 28468080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reporting and guidelines for mendelian randomization analysis: A systematic review of oncological studies.
Lor GCY; Risch HA; Fung WT; Au Yeung SL; Wong IOL; Zheng W; Pang H
Cancer Epidemiol; 2019 Oct; 62():101577. PubMed ID: 31377572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Severity of bias of a simple estimator of the causal odds ratio in Mendelian randomization studies.
Harbord RM; Didelez V; Palmer TM; Meng S; Sterne JA; Sheehan NA
Stat Med; 2013 Mar; 32(7):1246-58. PubMed ID: 23080538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A framework for the investigation of pleiotropy in two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization.
Bowden J; Del Greco M F; Minelli C; Davey Smith G; Sheehan N; Thompson J
Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(11):1783-1802. PubMed ID: 28114746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Methodological challenges in mendelian randomization.
VanderWeele TJ; Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ; Cornelis M; Kraft P
Epidemiology; 2014 May; 25(3):427-35. PubMed ID: 24681576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mendelian randomisation for mediation analysis: current methods and challenges for implementation.
Carter AR; Sanderson E; Hammerton G; Richmond RC; Davey Smith G; Heron J; Taylor AE; Davies NM; Howe LD
Eur J Epidemiol; 2021 May; 36(5):465-478. PubMed ID: 33961203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combining Mendelian randomization with the sibling comparison design.
Sjölander A; Frisell T; Öberg S; Wang Y; Hägg S
Stat Med; 2024 Feb; 43(4):731-755. PubMed ID: 38073579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mendelian Randomization.
Grover S; Del Greco M F; Stein CM; Ziegler A
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():581-628. PubMed ID: 28980266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mendelian randomization mixed-scale treatment effect robust identification and estimation for causal inference.
Liu Z; Ye T; Sun B; Schooling M; Tchetgen ET
Biometrics; 2023 Sep; 79(3):2208-2219. PubMed ID: 35950778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
