These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25953957)

  • 1. Random-effects meta-analysis: the number of studies matters.
    Guolo A; Varin C
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Jun; 26(3):1500-1518. PubMed ID: 25953957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A double SIMEX approach for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Guolo A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):6. PubMed ID: 28077079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses.
    Langan D; Higgins JPT; Jackson D; Bowden J; Veroniki AA; Kontopantelis E; Viechtbauer W; Simmonds M
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):83-98. PubMed ID: 30067315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methods to calculate uncertainty in the estimated overall effect size from a random-effects meta-analysis.
    Veroniki AA; Jackson D; Bender R; Kuss O; Langan D; Higgins JPT; Knapp G; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):23-43. PubMed ID: 30129707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A simplification and implementation of random-effects meta-analyses based on the exact distribution of Cochran's Q.
    Preuß M; Ziegler A
    Methods Inf Med; 2014; 53(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 24317521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Higher-order likelihood inference in meta-analysis and meta-regression.
    Guolo A
    Stat Med; 2012 Feb; 31(4):313-27. PubMed ID: 22173666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian estimation in random effects meta-analysis using a non-informative prior.
    Bodnar O; Link A; Arendacká B; Possolo A; Elster C
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):378-399. PubMed ID: 27790722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extending DerSimonian and Laird's methodology to perform multivariate random effects meta-analyses.
    Jackson D; White IR; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2010 May; 29(12):1282-97. PubMed ID: 19408255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of methods for meta-analysis of a small number of studies with binary outcomes.
    Mathes T; Kuss O
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):366-381. PubMed ID: 29573180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Different meta-analysis methods can change judgements about imprecision of effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Wang Z; Alzuabi MA; Morgan RL; Mustafa RA; Falck-Ytter Y; Dahm P; Sultan S; Murad MH
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2023 Apr; 28(2):126-132. PubMed ID: 36732029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Red Meat Consumption and the Risk of Stroke: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.
    Yang C; Pan L; Sun C; Xi Y; Wang L; Li D
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2016 May; 25(5):1177-1186. PubMed ID: 26935118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of statistical methods for meta-analysis.
    Brockwell SE; Gordon IR
    Stat Med; 2001 Mar; 20(6):825-40. PubMed ID: 11252006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association between processed meat and red meat consumption and risk for glioma: a meta-analysis from 14 articles.
    Wei Y; Zou D; Cao D; Xie P
    Nutrition; 2015 Jan; 31(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 25466652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diabetes mellitus associated with processed and unprocessed red meat: an overview.
    Kouvari M; Notara V; Kalogeropoulos N; Panagiotakos DB
    Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2016 Nov; 67(7):735-43. PubMed ID: 27309597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving likelihood-based inference in control rate regression.
    Guolo A
    Stat Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):157-166. PubMed ID: 28975682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data.
    Stijnen T; Hamza TH; Ozdemir P
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):3046-67. PubMed ID: 20827667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Confidence intervals for random effects meta-analysis and robustness to publication bias.
    Henmi M; Copas JB
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):2969-83. PubMed ID: 20963748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A likelihood approach to meta-analysis with random effects.
    Hardy RJ; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 1996 Mar; 15(6):619-29. PubMed ID: 8731004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A simple method for inference on an overall effect in meta-analysis.
    Brockwell SE; Gordon IR
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4531-43. PubMed ID: 17397112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.