These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

646 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25954704)

  • 1. A Comparative SEM Investigation of Smear Layer Remaining on Dentinal Walls by Three Rotary NiTi Files with Different Cross Sectional Designs in Moderately Curved Canals.
    Sharma G; Kakkar P; Vats A
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Mar; 9(3):ZC43-7. PubMed ID: 25954704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
    Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
    Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
    Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.
    Kiran S; Prakash S; Siddharth PR; Saha S; Geojan NE; Ramachandran M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 27595725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
    Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
    Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative analysis of cleaning ability of three nickel-titanium rotary systems: ProTaper universal, K3 and Mtwo: An
    Raut AW; Mantri V; Palekar A; Gadodia R; Kala S; Raut RA
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2016; 23(4):221-226. PubMed ID: 28000644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the efficacy of Smear Clear with and without a canal brush in smear layer and debris removal from instrumented root canal using WaveOne versus ProTaper: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Kamel WH; Kataia EM
    J Endod; 2014 Mar; 40(3):446-50. PubMed ID: 24565669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative study of root canal preparation using Profile .04 and Lightspeed rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Versümer J; Hülsmann M; Schäfers F
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jan; 35(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 11853237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative evaluation of cleaning efficacy (debris and smear layer removal) of hand and two NiTi rotary instrumentation systems (K3 and ProTaper): a SEM study.
    Reddy KB; Dash S; Kallepalli S; Vallikanthan S; Chakrapani N; Kalepu V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1028-35. PubMed ID: 24858745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Smear layer and debris removal using manual Ni-Ti files compared with rotary Protaper Ni- Ti files - An In-Vitro SEM study.
    Reddy JM; Latha P; Gowda B; Manvikar V; Vijayalaxmi DB; Ponangi KC
    J Int Oral Health; 2014 Feb; 6(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 24653610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy using Four Novel Nickel-titanium Rotary Instruments: An in vitro Scanning Electron Microscope Study.
    Kar PP; Khasnis SA; Kidiyoor KH
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Dec; 18(12):1135-1143. PubMed ID: 29208788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of surface preparation and maintenance of canal curvature following instrumentation with hand 'K' file and three different Ni-Ti rotary systems: A radiographic and SEM study.
    Bhatti N; Sroa R; Sikri VK
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2010 Apr; 1(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 22114390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the cleaning capacity of Mtwo and Pro Taper rotary systems and manual instruments in primary teeth.
    Azar MR; Safi L; Nikaein A
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2012 Mar; 9(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 22623929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
    Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Comparative Efficacy of Different Files in The Removal of Different Sealers in Simulated Root Canal Retreatment- An In-vitro Study.
    Kanaparthy A; Kanaparthy R
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 May; 10(5):ZC130-3. PubMed ID: 27437347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2006 Mar; 39(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 16507074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.