207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25956494)
21. T1rho mapping of entire femoral cartilage using depth- and angle-dependent analysis.
Nozaki T; Kaneko Y; Yu HJ; Kaneshiro K; Schwarzkopf R; Hara T; Yoshioka H
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1952-62. PubMed ID: 26396106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prospective comparison of 3D FIESTA versus fat-suppressed 3D SPGR MRI in evaluating knee cartilage lesions.
Li X; Yu C; Wu H; Daniel K; Hu D; Xia L; Pan C; Xu A; Hu J; Wang L; Peng W; Li F
Clin Radiol; 2009 Oct; 64(10):1000-8. PubMed ID: 19748006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Diagnostic value of T1ρ and T2 mapping sequences of 3D fat-suppressed spoiled gradient (FS SPGR-3D) 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging for osteoarthritis.
Li Z; Wang H; Lu Y; Jiang M; Chen Z; Xi X; Ding X; Yan F
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jan; 98(1):e13834. PubMed ID: 30608398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Volumetric cartilage measurements of porcine knee at 1.5-T and 3.0-T MR imaging: evaluation of precision and accuracy.
Bauer JS; Krause SJ; Ross CJ; Krug R; Carballido-Gamio J; Ozhinsky E; Majumdar S; Link TM
Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):399-406. PubMed ID: 17057067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. High-resolution 3D cartilage imaging with IDEAL SPGR at 3 T.
Siepmann DB; McGovern J; Brittain JH; Reeder SB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Dec; 189(6):1510-5. PubMed ID: 18029893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with three-dimensional MR imaging.
Dupuy DE; Spillane RM; Rosol MS; Rosenthal DI; Palmer WE; Burke DW; Rosenberg AE
Acad Radiol; 1996 Nov; 3(11):919-24. PubMed ID: 8959181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Quantitation of articular cartilage using magnetic resonance imaging and three-dimensional reconstruction.
Marshall KW; Mikulis DJ; Guthrie BM
J Orthop Res; 1995 Nov; 13(6):814-23. PubMed ID: 8544016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of wrist MRI at 3.0T: comparison between isotropic 3D turbo spin echo and isotropic 3D fast field echo and 2D turbo spin echo.
Jung JY; Yoon YC; Jung JY; Choe BK
Acta Radiol; 2013 Apr; 54(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 23319720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. In vivo proton MR three-dimensional T1rho mapping of human articular cartilage: initial experience.
Regatte RR; Akella SV; Borthakur A; Kneeland JB; Reddy R
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):269-74. PubMed ID: 14519880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of subchondral bone and cartilage thickness measurement from MRI.
McGibbon CA
Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Sep; 21(7):707-14. PubMed ID: 14559334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Articular cartilage of the knee: evaluation with fluctuating equilibrium MR imaging--initial experience in healthy volunteers.
Gold GE; Hargreaves BA; Vasanawala SS; Webb JD; Shimakawa AS; Brittain JH; Beaulieu CF
Radiology; 2006 Feb; 238(2):712-8. PubMed ID: 16436826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. High resolution T1ρ mapping of in vivo human knee cartilage at 7T.
Singh A; Haris M; Cai K; Kogan F; Hariharan H; Reddy R
PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e97486. PubMed ID: 24830386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Normal T2 map profile of the entire femoral cartilage using an angle/layer-dependent approach.
Kaneko Y; Nozaki T; Yu H; Chang A; Kaneshiro K; Schwarzkopf R; Hara T; Yoshioka H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(6):1507-16. PubMed ID: 25917977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Knee derangements: comparison of isotropic 3D fast spin-echo, isotropic 3D balanced fast field-echo, and conventional 2D fast spin-echo MR imaging.
Jung JY; Yoon YC; Kim HR; Choe BK; Wang JH; Jung JY
Radiology; 2013 Sep; 268(3):802-13. PubMed ID: 23533289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A preliminary study of the T1rho values of normal knee cartilage using 3T-MRI.
Goto H; Iwama Y; Fujii M; Aoyama N; Kubo S; Kuroda R; Ohno Y; Sugimura K
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):e796-803. PubMed ID: 22525597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of quantitative cartilage measurements acquired on two 3.0T MRI systems from different manufacturers.
Kornaat PR; Koo S; Andriacchi TP; Bloem JL; Gold GE
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 May; 23(5):770-3. PubMed ID: 16568430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy.
Disler DG; McCauley TR; Kelman CG; Fuchs MD; Ratner LM; Wirth CR; Hospodar PP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 8659356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessment of cartilage-dedicated sequences at ultra-high-field MRI: comparison of imaging performance and diagnostic confidence between 3.0 and 7.0 T with respect to osteoarthritis-induced changes at the knee joint.
Stahl R; Krug R; Kelley DA; Zuo J; Ma CB; Majumdar S; Link TM
Skeletal Radiol; 2009 Aug; 38(8):771-83. PubMed ID: 19294379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Parallel imaging of knee cartilage at 3 Tesla.
Zuo J; Li X; Banerjee S; Han E; Majumdar S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):1001-9. PubMed ID: 17896394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Validation of magnetic resonance imaging for measurement of equine articular cartilage and subchondral bone thickness.
Murray RC; Branch MV; Tranquille C; Woods S
Am J Vet Res; 2005 Nov; 66(11):1999-2005. PubMed ID: 16334962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
