These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

477 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25957164)

  • 1. Validation of a nurses' views on electronic medical record systems (EMR) questionnaire in Turkish health system.
    Top M; Yilmaz A; Karabulut E; Otieno OG; Saylam M; Bakır S; Top S
    J Med Syst; 2015 Jun; 39(6):67. PubMed ID: 25957164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nurses' views on electronic medical records (EMR) in Turkey: an analysis according to use, quality and user satisfaction.
    Top M; Gider O
    J Med Syst; 2012 Jun; 36(3):1979-88. PubMed ID: 21302133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nurses' views on the use, quality and user satisfaction with electronic medical records: questionnaire development.
    Otieno OG; Toyama H; Asonuma M; Kanai-Pak M; Naitoh K
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Oct; 60(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 17877568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of a professionals' satisfaction questionnaire with electronic medical records (PSQ-EMR) in psychiatry.
    Boyer L; Baumstarck-Barrau K; Belzeaux R; Azorin JM; Chabannes JM; Dassa D; Lancon C; Naudin J; Poinso F; Rufo M; Samuelian JC; Loundou A; Fieschi M; Auquier P
    Eur Psychiatry; 2011 Mar; 26(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 20418071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nurses' perceptions of and attitudes toward an electronic medical record system at Seoul National University Hospital.
    Ahn TS; Park IS; You OS; Shin HJ; Woo KS; Jo EM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 122():851. PubMed ID: 17102423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), Generic version (Short Form 2006).
    Deilkås ET; Hofoss D
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Sep; 8():191. PubMed ID: 18808693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Electronic Health Record Implementation in Hospitals.
    Tubaishat A
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2017 Jul; 35(7):364-372. PubMed ID: 28221186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the validity and reliability of the V-scale instrument (Turkish version) used to determine nurses' attitudes towards vital sign monitoring.
    Ertuğ N
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2018 Jun; 24(3):e12637. PubMed ID: 29506320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and initial validation of a Theory of Planned Behaviour questionnaire to assess critical care nurses' intention to use physical restraints.
    Via-Clavero G; Guàrdia-Olmos J; Gallart-Vivé E; Arias-Rivera S; Castanera-Duro A; Delgado-Hito P
    J Adv Nurs; 2019 Sep; 75(9):2036-2049. PubMed ID: 31090090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hospital Nurses' Work Activity in a Technology-Rich Environment: A Triangulated Quality Improvement Assessment.
    Higgins LW; Shovel JA; Bilderback AL; Lorenz HL; Martin SC; Rogers DJ; Minnier TE
    J Nurs Care Qual; 2017; 32(3):208-217. PubMed ID: 28541263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling antecedents of electronic medical record system implementation success in low-resource setting hospitals.
    Tilahun B; Fritz F
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2015 Aug; 15():61. PubMed ID: 26231051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [French validation of the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale-VSSS-54F].
    Corbière M; Lesage A; Lauzon S; Ricard N; Reinharz D
    Encephale; 2003; 29(2):110-8. PubMed ID: 14567162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptation of the Workflow Integration Survey to Turkey: A Validity and Reliability Study.
    Özduyan Kılıç M; Korkmaz F
    J Nurs Meas; 2024 Jun; 32(2):174-182. PubMed ID: 37348887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nurses' perceptions of motivational factors: a case study in a Turkish university hospital.
    Kantek F; Yildirim N; Kavla İ
    J Nurs Manag; 2015 Jul; 23(5):674-81. PubMed ID: 24372763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability and construct validity of the Complexity Compression Questionnaire.
    Hughes RG; Fridlington L; Ryan P
    J Nurs Meas; 2014; 22(2):291-301. PubMed ID: 25255679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validating the Nurses' Perceptions of Electronic Documentation Scale in a Cross-Sectional Sample of Registered Nurses in Australia: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis.
    Brunelli V; Schenk EC; Burduli E
    J Nurs Meas; 2021 Apr; 29(1):6-20. PubMed ID: 33602791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and validation of the Geriatric In-hospital Nursing Care Questionnaire.
    Persoon A; Bakker FC; van der Wal-Huisman H; Olde Rikkert MG
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2015 Feb; 63(2):327-34. PubMed ID: 25640979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring hospital nurses' well-being at work - psychometric testing of the scale.
    Päätalo K; Kyngäs H
    Contemp Nurse; 2016 Dec; 52(6):722-735. PubMed ID: 27734770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the evidence based practice evaluation competence questionnaire.
    Yildiz E; Güngörmüş Z
    Nurse Educ Today; 2016 Oct; 45():91-5. PubMed ID: 27429412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Moral distress in Turkish intensive care nurses.
    Karagozoglu S; Yildirim G; Ozden D; Çınar Z
    Nurs Ethics; 2017 Mar; 24(2):209-224. PubMed ID: 26208720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.