These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25957279)

  • 1. Does the anticipation of compatible partner reactions facilitate action planning in joint tasks?
    Müller R
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):464-86. PubMed ID: 25957279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attention allocation and task representation during joint action planning.
    Kourtis D; Knoblich G; Woźniak M; Sebanz N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Oct; 26(10):2275-86. PubMed ID: 24702448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. My partner is also on my mind: social context modulates the N1 response.
    Baess P; Prinz W
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jan; 233(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 25224703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How do partner reactions affect task set selection: Specific imitation or abstract tasks?
    Müller R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Nov; 73(11):2008-2025. PubMed ID: 32530365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of action effects in motor sequence planning and execution: exploring the influence of temporal and spatial effect anticipation.
    Brown RM; Friedgen E; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2022 Jun; 86(4):1078-1096. PubMed ID: 34185146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subliminal priming of actions influences sense of control over effects of action.
    Wenke D; Fleming SM; Haggard P
    Cognition; 2010 Apr; 115(1):26-38. PubMed ID: 19945697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Action-effect anticipation and temporal adaptation in social interactions.
    Lelonkiewicz JR; Gambi C; Weller L; Pfister R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Apr; 46(4):335-349. PubMed ID: 32223288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of subliminal effect images in voluntary vs. stimulus-driven actions.
    Le Bars S; Hsu YF; Waszak F
    Cognition; 2016 Nov; 156():6-15. PubMed ID: 27467892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Action control costs in task selection: Agents avoid actions with incompatible movement and effect features.
    Neszmélyi B; Pfister R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1330-1341. PubMed ID: 38514596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response-effect compatibility with complex actions: the case of wheel rotations.
    Janczyk M; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW; Pfister R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):930-40. PubMed ID: 25567418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Social learning of action-effect associations: Modulation of action control following observation of virtual action's effects.
    Belhassein K; Marshall PJ; Badets A; Bouquet CA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):484-496. PubMed ID: 33078379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Joint action goals reduce visuomotor interference effects from a partner's incongruent actions.
    Clarke S; McEllin L; Francová A; Székely M; Butterfill SA; Michael J
    Sci Rep; 2019 Oct; 9(1):15414. PubMed ID: 31659223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pointing out mechanisms underlying joint action.
    Porcu E; Bölling L; Lappe M; Liepelt R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):972-7. PubMed ID: 27016344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adaptive control of ideomotor effect anticipations.
    Pfister R; Kiesel A; Melcher T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Nov; 135(3):316-22. PubMed ID: 20875631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic imitation? Imitative compatibility affects responses at high perceptual load.
    Catmur C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Apr; 42(4):530-9. PubMed ID: 26569336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fast responders have blinders on: ERP correlates of response inhibition in competition.
    de Bruijn ER; Miedl SF; Bekkering H
    Cortex; 2008 May; 44(5):580-6. PubMed ID: 18387590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Motor-related cortical oscillations distinguish one's own from a partner's contributions to a joint action.
    Bolt NK; Loehr JD
    Biol Psychol; 2024 Jul; 190():108804. PubMed ID: 38670429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of selective attention in matching observed and executed actions.
    Chong TT; Cunnington R; Williams MA; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):786-95. PubMed ID: 19124033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. I've got your number: Spontaneous perspective-taking in an interactive task.
    Surtees A; Apperly I; Samson D
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():43-52. PubMed ID: 26848735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What or when? The impact of anticipated social action effects is driven by action-effect compatibility, not delay.
    Pfister R; Weller L; Dignath D; Kunde W
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2132-2142. PubMed ID: 28688096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.