These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25957279)

  • 21. Motion coordination affects movement parameters in a joint pick-and-place task.
    Vesper C; Soutschek A; Schubo A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Dec; 62(12):2418-32. PubMed ID: 19499488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Response-specific effects in a joint action task: social inhibition of return effects do not emerge when observed and executed actions are different.
    Manzone J; Cole GG; Skarratt PA; Welsh TN
    Psychol Res; 2017 Sep; 81(5):1059-1071. PubMed ID: 27530404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Joint response-effect compatibility.
    Pfister R; Dolk T; Prinz W; Kunde W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Jun; 21(3):817-22. PubMed ID: 24101572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Perceiving by proxy: effect-based action control with unperceivable effects.
    Pfister R; Pfeuffer CU; Kunde W
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):251-61. PubMed ID: 24853628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A look into the future: Spontaneous anticipatory saccades reflect processes of anticipatory action control.
    Pfeuffer CU; Kiesel A; Huestegge L
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Nov; 145(11):1530-1547. PubMed ID: 27797559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Exploring the representational basis of response-effect compatibility: Evidence from bilingual verbal response-effect mappings.
    Földes N; Philipp AM; Badets A; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 May; 186():1-7. PubMed ID: 29631041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of haptic feedback from self-touch on limb movement coordination.
    Verrel J; Hagura N; Lindenberger U; Haggard P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1775-85. PubMed ID: 23750963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How preschoolers and adults represent their joint action partner's behavior.
    Sacheli LM; Meyer M; Hartstra E; Bekkering H; Hunnius S
    Psychol Res; 2019 Jul; 83(5):863-877. PubMed ID: 29067520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Target- and effect-directed actions towards temporal goals: similar mechanisms?
    Walter AM; Rieger M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Aug; 38(4):958-74. PubMed ID: 22686693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Imitative response tendencies following observation of intransitive actions.
    Bertenthal BI; Longo MR; Kosobud A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):210-25. PubMed ID: 16634666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Predictive representation of other people's actions in joint action planning: an EEG study.
    Kourtis D; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Soc Neurosci; 2013; 8(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 22671131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Stroking me softly: Body-related effects in effect-based action control.
    Wirth R; Pfister R; Brandes J; Kunde W
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1755-70. PubMed ID: 27270736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sequential actions: effects of upcoming perceptual and motor tasks on current actions.
    LeBlanc KA; Westwood DA
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Apr; 234(4):955-62. PubMed ID: 26680770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The (not so) social Simon effect: a referential coding account.
    Dolk T; Hommel B; Prinz W; Liepelt R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1248-60. PubMed ID: 23339346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Attention to future actions: the influence of instructed S-R versus S-S mappings on attentional control.
    Tibboel H; Liefooghe B; De Houwer J
    Psychol Res; 2016 Nov; 80(6):905-911. PubMed ID: 26245823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Transitory Inhibition of the Left Anterior Intraparietal Sulcus Impairs Joint Actions: A Continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation Study.
    Sacheli LM; Tieri G; Aglioti SM; Candidi M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 May; 30(5):737-751. PubMed ID: 29308985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Index of difficulty and side of space are accommodated during the selection and planning of a joint action.
    Ray M; de Grosbois J; Welsh TN
    Hum Mov Sci; 2017 Aug; 54():197-209. PubMed ID: 28527422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A change of task prolongs early processes: evidence from ERPs in lexical tasks.
    Elchlepp H; Lavric A; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Apr; 144(2):299-325. PubMed ID: 25844623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Role of an ideomotor mechanism in number processing.
    Badets A; Koch I; Toussaint L
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 22935328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.