These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25957304)

  • 1. Retracting Soft Tissue in Minimally Invasive Hip Arthroplasty Using a Robotic Arm: A Comparison Between a Semiactive Retractor Holder and Human Assistants in a Cadaver Study.
    Putzer D; Klug S; Haselbacher M; Mayr E; Nogler M
    Surg Innov; 2015 Oct; 22(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 25957304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of time-of-flight camera for navigating robots in computer-aided surgery: monitoring the soft tissue envelope of minimally invasive hip approach in a cadaver study.
    Putzer D; Klug S; Moctezuma JL; Nogler M
    Surg Innov; 2014 Dec; 21(6):630-6. PubMed ID: 24667523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An articulating retractor holder to facilitate laparoscopic adrenalectomy and nephrectomy.
    Pautler SE; McWilliams GW; Harrington FS; Walther MM
    J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):198-9. PubMed ID: 11435857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of retraction pressure between novel and conventional retractor systems--a cadaver study.
    Pattavilakom A; Seex KA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 May; 12(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 20433304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of optimal non-invasive patient fixation methods for use in robotic hip replacement surgery--an in vitro study.
    Schulz AP; Tarabolsi M; Faber A; Meiners J; Kammal M; Mantwill F
    Int J Med Robot; 2007 Jun; 3(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 17619243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic systems in total hip arthroplasty--is the time ripe for a new approach?
    Mantwill F; Schulz AP; Faber A; Hollstein D; Kammal M; Fay A; Jürgens Ch
    Int J Med Robot; 2005 Dec; 1(4):8-19. PubMed ID: 17518400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Small Amount of Retraction Force Results in Inadvertent Piriformis Muscle Damage During a Piriformis-Sparing Approach to the Hip.
    Amanatullah DF; Shah HN; Barrett AA; Storaci HW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Oct; 102(19):1687-1693. PubMed ID: 33027122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anterior acetabular retractors and the femoral neurovascular bundle in anterior total hip arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.
    Stubbs T; Moon AS; Dahlgren N; Patel HA; Jha AJ; Shah A; Naranje SM
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2020 May; 30(4):617-620. PubMed ID: 31863272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Instrumentation for laparoscopic renal surgery--Padron Endoscopic Exposing Retractor (PEER) and Endoholder: point of technique.
    Rehman J; Sundaram CP; Khan SA; Venkatesh R; Waltzer WC
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2005 Feb; 15(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 15714150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An atraumatic retractor for interdisciplinary use in conventional laparoscopy and robotic surgery.
    Alkatout I
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2018 Oct; 27(5):265-271. PubMed ID: 29457928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is the Use of a Robotic Camera Holder Economically Viable? A Cost Comparison of Surgical Assistant Versus the Use of a Robotic Camera Holder in Laparoscopic Liver Resections.
    Stott MC; Barrie J; Sebastien D; Hammill C; Subar DA
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2017 Oct; 27(5):375-378. PubMed ID: 28727633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robot-assisted retractor in spine surgery: Preliminary evaluation of its feasibility and two operation mode in beagles.
    Jiang Y; Xiang L; He D; Tian W
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2024; 32(1):10225536241248712. PubMed ID: 38647529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A force-sensing retractor for robot-assisted transoral surgery.
    Zhu L; Yang S; Shen J; Wang C; Song A
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2022 Nov; 17(11):2001-2010. PubMed ID: 35612715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally invasive orthopedic surgery: first results in navigated total hip arthroplasty.
    Walde HJ; Walde TA
    Orthopedics; 2006 Oct; 29(10 Suppl):S139-41. PubMed ID: 17407941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: preoperative planning and surgical technique.
    Roche M; O'Loughlin PF; Kendoff D; Musahl V; Pearle AD
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2009 Feb; 38(2 Suppl):10-5. PubMed ID: 19340377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Elastic Intra-corporeal Retractor for Bariatric and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery.
    Mouawad C; Andraos Y; Sleilati F
    Obes Surg; 2024 Jul; 34(7):2730-2735. PubMed ID: 38862751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotically Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty with a Handheld Image-Free Sculpting Tool.
    Lonner JH
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2016 Jan; 47(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 26614918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic Camera Assistance: The Future of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery?
    Ali JM; Lam K; Coonar AS
    Surg Innov; 2018 Oct; 25(5):485-491. PubMed ID: 29938603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of the self-retaining Alexis ring retractor in transoral robotic surgery.
    Perenyei M; Dobbs TD; Fraser LR; Winter SC
    Head Neck; 2017 Oct; 39(10):2132-2134. PubMed ID: 28736813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vivo comparison of hip mechanics for minimally invasive versus traditional total hip arthroplasty.
    Glaser D; Dennis DA; Komistek RD; Miner TM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Feb; 23(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 18022739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.