BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1087 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25957350)

  • 21. Using combined evidence from replicates to evaluate ChIP-seq peaks.
    Jalili V; Matteucci M; Masseroli M; Morelli MJ
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2761-9. PubMed ID: 25957351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Modeling co-occupancy of transcription factors using chromatin features.
    Liu L; Zhao W; Zhou X
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Mar; 44(5):e49. PubMed ID: 26590261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The native cistrome and sequence motif families of the maize ear.
    Savadel SD; Hartwig T; Turpin ZM; Vera DL; Lung PY; Sui X; Blank M; Frommer WB; Dennis JH; Zhang J; Bass HW
    PLoS Genet; 2021 Aug; 17(8):e1009689. PubMed ID: 34383745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Imputation for transcription factor binding predictions based on deep learning.
    Qin Q; Feng J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005403. PubMed ID: 28234893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cell-type and transcription factor specific enrichment of transcriptional cofactor motifs in ENCODE ChIP-seq data.
    Goi C; Little P; Xie C
    BMC Genomics; 2013; 14 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S2. PubMed ID: 24564528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A map of direct TF-DNA interactions in the human genome.
    Gheorghe M; Sandve GK; Khan A; Chèneby J; Ballester B; Mathelier A
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Feb; 47(4):e21. PubMed ID: 30517703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sequence features and chromatin structure around the genomic regions bound by 119 human transcription factors.
    Wang J; Zhuang J; Iyer S; Lin X; Whitfield TW; Greven MC; Pierce BG; Dong X; Kundaje A; Cheng Y; Rando OJ; Birney E; Myers RM; Noble WS; Snyder M; Weng Z
    Genome Res; 2012 Sep; 22(9):1798-812. PubMed ID: 22955990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Combining transcription factor binding affinities with open-chromatin data for accurate gene expression prediction.
    Schmidt F; Gasparoni N; Gasparoni G; Gianmoena K; Cadenas C; Polansky JK; Ebert P; Nordström K; Barann M; Sinha A; Fröhler S; Xiong J; Dehghani Amirabad A; Behjati Ardakani F; Hutter B; Zipprich G; Felder B; Eils J; Brors B; Chen W; Hengstler JG; Hamann A; Lengauer T; Rosenstiel P; Walter J; Schulz MH
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Jan; 45(1):54-66. PubMed ID: 27899623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Wellington-bootstrap: differential DNase-seq footprinting identifies cell-type determining transcription factors.
    Piper J; Assi SA; Cauchy P; Ladroue C; Cockerill PN; Bonifer C; Ott S
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Nov; 16():1000. PubMed ID: 26608661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Base-resolution methylation patterns accurately predict transcription factor bindings in vivo.
    Xu T; Li B; Zhao M; Szulwach KE; Street RC; Lin L; Yao B; Zhang F; Jin P; Wu H; Qin ZS
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Mar; 43(5):2757-66. PubMed ID: 25722376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predicting cell-type-specific gene expression from regions of open chromatin.
    Natarajan A; Yardimci GG; Sheffield NC; Crawford GE; Ohler U
    Genome Res; 2012 Sep; 22(9):1711-22. PubMed ID: 22955983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Identification of transcription factor binding sites from ChIP-seq data at high resolution.
    Bardet AF; Steinmann J; Bafna S; Knoblich JA; Zeitlinger J; Stark A
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Nov; 29(21):2705-13. PubMed ID: 23980024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An efficient method to transcription factor binding sites imputation via simultaneous completion of multiple matrices with positional consistency.
    Guo WL; Huang DS
    Mol Biosyst; 2017 Aug; 13(9):1827-1837. PubMed ID: 28718849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Genome-scale mapping of DNase I hypersensitivity.
    John S; Sabo PJ; Canfield TK; Lee K; Vong S; Weaver M; Wang H; Vierstra J; Reynolds AP; Thurman RE; Stamatoyannopoulos JA
    Curr Protoc Mol Biol; 2013 Jul; Chapter 27():Unit 21.27. PubMed ID: 23821440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accurate prediction of inducible transcription factor binding intensities in vivo.
    Guertin MJ; Martins AL; Siepel A; Lis JT
    PLoS Genet; 2012; 8(3):e1002610. PubMed ID: 22479205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bivariate Genomic Footprinting Detects Changes in Transcription Factor Activity.
    Baek S; Goldstein I; Hager GL
    Cell Rep; 2017 May; 19(8):1710-1722. PubMed ID: 28538187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Base-pair resolution detection of transcription factor binding site by deep deconvolutional network.
    Salekin S; Zhang JM; Huang Y
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Oct; 34(20):3446-3453. PubMed ID: 29757349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cell-type specificity of ChIP-predicted transcription factor binding sites.
    Håndstad T; Rye M; Močnik R; Drabløs F; Sætrom P
    BMC Genomics; 2012 Aug; 13():372. PubMed ID: 22863112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Identification of C2H2-ZF binding preferences from ChIP-seq data using RCADE.
    Najafabadi HS; Albu M; Hughes TR
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2879-81. PubMed ID: 25953800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Inferring transcription factor complexes from ChIP-seq data.
    Whitington T; Frith MC; Johnson J; Bailey TL
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2011 Aug; 39(15):e98. PubMed ID: 21602262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 55.