BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1089 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25957350)

  • 41. Multiplex indexing approach for the detection of DNase I hypersensitive sites in single cells.
    Gao W; Ku WL; Pan L; Perrie J; Zhao T; Hu G; Wu Y; Zhu J; Ni B; Zhao K
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2021 Jun; 49(10):e56. PubMed ID: 33693880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. ChIPulate: A comprehensive ChIP-seq simulation pipeline.
    Datta V; Hannenhalli S; Siddharthan R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Mar; 15(3):e1006921. PubMed ID: 30897079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Genome-Scale Analysis of Cell-Specific Regulatory Codes Using Nuclear Enzymes.
    Baek S; Sung MH
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1418():225-40. PubMed ID: 27008018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Ritornello: high fidelity control-free chromatin immunoprecipitation peak calling.
    Stanton KP; Jin J; Lederman RR; Weissman SM; Kluger Y
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Dec; 45(21):e173. PubMed ID: 28981893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. CisMapper: predicting regulatory interactions from transcription factor ChIP-seq data.
    O'Connor T; Bodén M; Bailey TL
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Feb; 45(4):e19. PubMed ID: 28204599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. On the problem of confounders in modeling gene expression.
    Schmidt F; Schulz MH
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Feb; 35(4):711-719. PubMed ID: 30084962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. ChIP-BIT: Bayesian inference of target genes using a novel joint probabilistic model of ChIP-seq profiles.
    Chen X; Jung JG; Shajahan-Haq AN; Clarke R; Shih IeM; Wang Y; Magnani L; Wang TL; Xuan J
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Apr; 44(7):e65. PubMed ID: 26704972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A comparison of peak callers used for DNase-Seq data.
    Koohy H; Down TA; Spivakov M; Hubbard T
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96303. PubMed ID: 24810143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. PscanChIP: Finding over-represented transcription factor-binding site motifs and their correlations in sequences from ChIP-Seq experiments.
    Zambelli F; Pesole G; Pavesi G
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2013 Jul; 41(Web Server issue):W535-43. PubMed ID: 23748563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. msCentipede: Modeling Heterogeneity across Genomic Sites and Replicates Improves Accuracy in the Inference of Transcription Factor Binding.
    Raj A; Shim H; Gilad Y; Pritchard JK; Stephens M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138030. PubMed ID: 26406244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. ChiLin: a comprehensive ChIP-seq and DNase-seq quality control and analysis pipeline.
    Qin Q; Mei S; Wu Q; Sun H; Li L; Taing L; Chen S; Li F; Liu T; Zang C; Xu H; Chen Y; Meyer CA; Zhang Y; Brown M; Long HW; Liu XS
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):404. PubMed ID: 27716038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Exploiting genetic variation to uncover rules of transcription factor binding and chromatin accessibility.
    Behera V; Evans P; Face CJ; Hamagami N; Sankaranarayanan L; Keller CA; Giardine B; Tan K; Hardison RC; Shi J; Blobel GA
    Nat Commun; 2018 Feb; 9(1):782. PubMed ID: 29472540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Anchor: trans-cell type prediction of transcription factor binding sites.
    Li H; Quang D; Guan Y
    Genome Res; 2019 Feb; 29(2):281-292. PubMed ID: 30567711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Discovering human transcription factor physical interactions with genetic variants, novel DNA motifs, and repetitive elements using enhanced yeast one-hybrid assays.
    Shrestha S; Sewell JA; Santoso CS; Forchielli E; Carrasco Pro S; Martinez M; Fuxman Bass JI
    Genome Res; 2019 Sep; 29(9):1533-1544. PubMed ID: 31481462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Integrative analysis of ChIP-chip and ChIP-seq dataset.
    Zhu LJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1067():105-24. PubMed ID: 23975789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Genome-wide footprinting: ready for prime time?
    Sung MH; Baek S; Hager GL
    Nat Methods; 2016 Mar; 13(3):222-228. PubMed ID: 26914206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57.
    Zeng J; Li G
    Int J Biol Sci; 2018; 14(12):1724-1731. PubMed ID: 30416387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Atlas of Transcription Factor Binding Sites from ENCODE DNase Hypersensitivity Data across 27 Tissue Types.
    Funk CC; Casella AM; Jung S; Richards MA; Rodriguez A; Shannon P; Donovan-Maiye R; Heavner B; Chard K; Xiao Y; Glusman G; Ertekin-Taner N; Golde TE; Toga A; Hood L; Van Horn JD; Kesselman C; Foster I; Madduri R; Price ND; Ament SA
    Cell Rep; 2020 Aug; 32(7):108029. PubMed ID: 32814038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Deconvolving sequence features that discriminate between overlapping regulatory annotations.
    Kakumanu A; Velasco S; Mazzoni E; Mahony S
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Oct; 13(10):e1005795. PubMed ID: 29049320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Identification of coupling DNA motif pairs on long-range chromatin interactions in human K562 cells.
    Wong KC; Li Y; Peng C
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 32(3):321-4. PubMed ID: 26411866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 55.