426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25957590)
21. Does Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Optimize Limb Length and the Precision of Acetabular Positioning in Primary THA?
Leucht P; Huddleston HG; Bellino MJ; Huddleston JI
Orthopedics; 2015 May; 38(5):e380-6. PubMed ID: 25970364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Conventional cup navigation with 2D fluoroscopy in THA: accurate cup positioning respecting pelvic tilt].
Pichl J; Kremer M; Hoffmann R
Z Orthop Unfall; 2011 Oct; 149(5):510-7. PubMed ID: 21480171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Functional acetabular component position with supine total hip replacement.
Eilander W; Harris SJ; Henkus HE; Cobb JP; Hogervorst T
Bone Joint J; 2013 Oct; 95-B(10):1326-31. PubMed ID: 24078527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Surgeons changing the approach for total hip arthroplasty from posterior to direct anterior with fluoroscopy should consider potential excessive cup anteversion and flexion implantation of the stem in their early experience.
Kobayashi H; Homma Y; Baba T; Ochi H; Matsumoto M; Yuasa T; Kaneko K
Int Orthop; 2016 Sep; 40(9):1813-9. PubMed ID: 26634579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of fluoroscopic and imageless registration in surgical navigation of the acetabular component.
Stiehl JB; Heck DA; Jaramaz B; Amiot LP
Comput Aided Surg; 2007 Mar; 12(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 17487661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Use of Fluoroscopy During Direct Anterior Hip Arthroplasty: Powerful or Misleading?
James CR; Peterson BE; Crim JR; Cook JL; Crist BD
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jun; 33(6):1775-1779. PubMed ID: 29500087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Total hip arthroplasty by direct anterior approach in the lateral position for the treatment of ankylosed hips.
Wu H; Cheng WD; Jing J
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2020 Aug; 30(6):993-1001. PubMed ID: 32185574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Surgeons' Accuracy in Achieving Their Desired Acetabular Component Orientation.
Grammatopoulos G; Alvand A; Monk AP; Mellon S; Pandit H; Rees J; Gill HS; Murray DW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Sep; 98(17):e72. PubMed ID: 27605697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of Cup Alignment, Jump Distance, and Complications in Consecutive Series of Anterior Approach and Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Hamilton WG; Parks NL; Huynh C
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Nov; 30(11):1959-62. PubMed ID: 26051865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A Comparison of Component Positioning Between Fluoroscopy-Assisted and Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Stewart NJ; Stewart JL; Brisbin A
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Aug; 37(8):1602-1605.e3. PubMed ID: 35314287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Direct anterior approach in lateral position achieves superior cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty: a radiological comparative study of two consecutive series.
Hu F; Shang X; Zhang X; Chen M
Int Orthop; 2020 Mar; 44(3):453-459. PubMed ID: 31900573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accuracy of measuring acetabular cup position after total hip arthroplasty: comparison between a radiographic planning software and three-dimensional computed tomography.
Bayraktar V; Weber M; von Kunow F; Zeman F; Craiovan B; Renkawitz T; Grifka J; Woerner M
Int Orthop; 2017 Apr; 41(4):731-738. PubMed ID: 27277948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A cadaver study validating CT assessment of acetabular component orientation: the Perth CT hip protocol.
Arora V; Hannan R; Beaver R; Fletcher T; Harvie P
Skeletal Radiol; 2017 Feb; 46(2):177-183. PubMed ID: 27826701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Standing radiological analysis with a low-dose biplanar imaging system (EOS system) of the position of the components in total hip arthroplasty using an anterior approach: a cohort study of 102 patients.
Morvan A; Moreau S; Combourieu B; Pansard E; Marmorat JL; Carlier R; Judet T; Lonjon G
Bone Joint J; 2016 Mar; 98-B(3):326-33. PubMed ID: 26920957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The relationship between operative and radiographic acetabular component orientation: which factors influence resultant cup orientation?
Grammatopoulos G; Pandit HG; da Assunção R; McLardy-Smith P; De Smet KA; Gill HS; Murray DW
Bone Joint J; 2014 Oct; 96-B(10):1290-7. PubMed ID: 25274911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Predictability of Acetabular Component Angular Change with Postural Shift from Standing to Sitting Position.
Kanawade V; Dorr LD; Wan Z
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Jun; 96(12):978-986. PubMed ID: 24951732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The Accuracy of a Mechanical Cup Alignment Guide in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Through Direct Anterior and Posterior Approaches Measured with CT-Based Navigation.
Maeda Y; Sugano N; Nakamura N; Hamawaki M
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Sep; 30(9):1561-4. PubMed ID: 25913560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A Comparison of Radiographic Outcomes after Total Hip Arthroplasty between the Direct Lateral Approach and Posterior Lateral Approach with EOS 2D/3D X-Ray Imaging System.
Xie R; Huang J; Wu Q; Qian YF; Jiang D; Li L; Huang L
Orthop Surg; 2023 May; 15(5):1312-1324. PubMed ID: 37076774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Is the Acetabular Cup Orientation Different in Robot-Assisted and Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty With Right-Handed Surgeons Using an Anterolateral Approach?
Kara GK; Turan K; Eroglu ON; Ozturk C; Ertürer E
Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e42335. PubMed ID: 37614261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional acetabular cup placement in THA: a matched-pair controlled study.
Domb BG; El Bitar YF; Sadik AY; Stake CE; Botser IB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jan; 472(1):329-36. PubMed ID: 23990446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
