These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25957983)

  • 1. A new universal, standardized implant database for product identification: a unique tool for arthroplasty registries.
    Blömer W; Steinbrück A; Schröder C; Grothaus FJ; Melsheimer O; Mannel H; Forkel G; Eilers T; Liebs TR; Hassenpflug J; Jansson V
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 Jul; 135(7):919-26. PubMed ID: 25957983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [What can we learn in future from the data of the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD) in comparison to other registries?].
    Jansson V; Steinbrück A; Hassenpflug J
    Unfallchirurg; 2016 Jun; 119(6):488-92. PubMed ID: 27160728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Arthroplasty registries and their contribution to the safety of patient care in joint replacement].
    Heinz BC
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2009 Jun; 52(6):589-93. PubMed ID: 19412594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Registries as a tool for optimizing safety of endoprostheses. Experiences from other countries and the setup of the German arthroplasty register].
    Hassenpflug J; Liebs TR
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2014 Dec; 57(12):1376-83. PubMed ID: 25367173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Challenges in prosthesis classification.
    Robertsson O; Mendenhall S; Paxton EW; Inacio MC; Graves S
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93 Suppl 3():72-5. PubMed ID: 22262428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Generic implant classification enables comparison across implant designs: the Dutch Arthroplasty Register implant library.
    Denissen GAW; van Steenbergen LN; Lollinga WT; Verdonschot NJJ; Schreurs BW; Nelissen RGHH
    EFORT Open Rev; 2019 Jun; 4(6):344-350. PubMed ID: 31312521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [10 Years of the German Arthroplasty Registry-EPRD: what has been achieved?].
    Grimberg AW; Steinbrück A
    Orthopadie (Heidelb); 2023 Jun; 52(6):463-471. PubMed ID: 37221298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orthopedic implant retrieval--imperatives and possibilities.
    Yeakley B; Goswami T
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2009 Nov; 37(11):2326-36. PubMed ID: 19655252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Registration completeness in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Espehaug B; Furnes O; Havelin LI; Engesaeter LB; Vollset SE; Kindseth O
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Feb; 77(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 16534702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Norwegian Joint Registry.
    Havelin LI
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 1999; 58(3):139-47. PubMed ID: 10642863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Implant failure--prosthesis registry--examples elsewhere].
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2013 Apr; 151(2):116-8. PubMed ID: 23755389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Scandinavian experience of register collaboration: the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA).
    Havelin LI; Robertsson O; Fenstad AM; Overgaard S; Garellick G; Furnes O
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93 Suppl 3():13-9. PubMed ID: 22262418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is a Revision a Revision? An Analysis of National Arthroplasty Registries' Definitions of Revision.
    Liebs TR; Splietker F; Hassenpflug J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3421-30. PubMed ID: 25791442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The French Cochlear Implant Registry (EPIIC): Place and role of registries in post-registration studies of medical devices.
    Fraysse B; Thai Van H; Collignon C; Ruidavets B
    Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2020 Sep; 137 Suppl 1():S1-S3. PubMed ID: 32921590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. RSA and registries: the quest for phased introduction of new implants.
    Nelissen RG; Pijls BG; Kärrholm J; Malchau H; Nieuwenhuijse MJ; Valstar ER
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93 Suppl 3():62-5. PubMed ID: 22262426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of implant developers on published outcome and reproducibility of cohort-based clinical studies in arthroplasty.
    Labek G; Neumann D; Agreiter M; Schuh R; Böhler N
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 22262425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Early detection of systematic defects by endoprostheses registries].
    Liebs TR; Melsheimer O; Hassenpflug J
    Orthopade; 2014 Jun; 43(6):549-54. PubMed ID: 24891251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Registries of implantable medical devices in Europe.
    Niederländer C; Wahlster P; Kriza C; Kolominsky-Rabas P
    Health Policy; 2013 Nov; 113(1-2):20-37. PubMed ID: 24075007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monitoring the introduction and performance of a joint replacement: the United Kingdom metal-on-metal alert.
    Tucker K; Gregg P; Kay P; Porter M; Howard P; Pickford M; Cacou C
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93 Suppl 3():37-42. PubMed ID: 22262421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of registry data in the evaluation of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.
    Namba RS; Inacio MC; Paxton EW; Robertsson O; Graves SE
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93 Suppl 3():48-50. PubMed ID: 22262423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.