These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2595869)

  • 1. Effect of low osmolar, ionic and nonionic, contrast media on the cytologic features of exfoliated urothelial cells.
    Andriole GL; McClennan BL; Becich MJ; Picus DD
    Urol Radiol; 1989; 11(3):133-5. PubMed ID: 2595869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of water soluble contrast material on urine cytology.
    McClennan BL; Oertel YC; Malmgren RA; Mendoza M
    Acta Cytol; 1978; 22(4):230-3. PubMed ID: 281826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New and old contrast agents: pharmacology, tissue opacification, and excretory urography.
    Spataro RF
    Urol Radiol; 1988; 10(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 3043872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative cytotoxicity of low-osmolar nonionic and high-osmolar ionic contrast media to dog gallbladder epithelial cells.
    Ju YM; Kim MH; Lee SK; Seo DW; Min YI; Kim JY
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Mar; 55(3):382-6. PubMed ID: 11868013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variable effects of radiological contrast media on thrombus growth in a rabbit jugular vein thrombosis model.
    Levi M; Biemond BJ; Sturk A; Hoek J; ten Cate JW
    Thromb Haemost; 1991 Aug; 66(2):218-21. PubMed ID: 1771615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Urine profiles and kidney histology after intravenous injection of ionic and nonionic radiologic and magnetic resonance contrast media in normal rats.
    Thomsen HS; Dorph S; Larsen S; Horn T; Hemmingsen L; Skaarup P; Golman K; Svendsen O
    Acad Radiol; 1994 Oct; 1(2):128-35. PubMed ID: 9419476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Asymptomatic blood pressure and pulse rate changes during intravenous urography. Ionic contrast media vs. nonionic contrast media].
    Miwa K
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Sep; 50(9):1082-6. PubMed ID: 2247349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic efficacy of excretory urography with low-dose, nonionic contrast media.
    Gavant ML; Ellis JV; Klesges LM
    Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):657-60. PubMed ID: 1535877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Iodinated radiographic contrast media: comparison of low-osmolar with conventional ionic agents [corrected].
    Rubin JD; Cohan RH
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Oct; 3(5):637-45. PubMed ID: 1931499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonionic contrast media are less nephrotoxic than ionic contrast media to rat renal cortical slices.
    Soejima K; Uozumi J; Kanou T; Fujiyama C; Masaki Z
    Toxicol Lett; 2003 Jun; 143(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 12697376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The anticoagulant effects of ionic and nonionic low-osmolar contrast media in dogs.
    Kurisu Y; Tada S
    Invest Radiol; 1992 Sep; 27(9):686-8. PubMed ID: 1399451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative effects of ionic and nonionic iodinated low-osmolar contrast media on platelet function with the PFA-100 (platelet function analyzer).
    D'Anglemont De Tassigny A; IDéE JM; Corot AC
    Invest Radiol; 2001 May; 36(5):276-82. PubMed ID: 11323515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Effects of ionic and nonionic contrast media on the blood coagulation system, the fibrinolytic system and platelets].
    Himi K; Himi S; Takemoto A; Kamata R
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Sep; 51(9):1037-44. PubMed ID: 1945784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomized trial of low osmolar ionic versus nonionic contrast media in patients with myocardial infarction or unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.
    Grines CL; Schreiber TL; Savas V; Jones DE; Zidar FJ; Gangadharan V; Brodsky M; Levin R; Safian R; Puchrowicz-Ochocki S; Castellani MD; O'Neill WW
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 May; 27(6):1381-6. PubMed ID: 8626947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modulation of ADPase and t-PA release by radiographic contrast media in bovine aortic endothelium.
    Caprino L; Togna AR; Zappacosta B; Giardina B; Togna G
    Pharmacol Res; 1997 May; 35(5):429-33. PubMed ID: 9299206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of ionic and non-ionic contrast media on red cell aggregation in vitro.
    Aspelin P; Schmid-Schönbein H
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1978; 19(5):766-84. PubMed ID: 717028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New non-ionic contrast: effects on the cardiovascular system.
    Pagny JY; Gaux JC
    Eur J Radiol; 1996 Nov; 23 Suppl 1():S2-5. PubMed ID: 9056156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regional myocardial hemodynamic and metabolic effects of ionic and nonionic contrast media in normal and ischemic states.
    Gerber KH; Higgins CB; Yuh YS; Koziol JA
    Circulation; 1982 Jun; 65(7):1307-14. PubMed ID: 7074792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Renal clearance of an ionic high-osmolar and a nonionic low-osmolar contrast medium.
    Thomsen HS; Vestergaard A; Nielsen SL; Fogh-Andersen N; Golman K; Dorph S
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Jun; 26(6):564-8. PubMed ID: 1860763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A simplified radioenzymatic method for the study of whole blood histamine release in patients receiving radiographic contrast media.
    Faraj BA; Martin LG
    Invest Radiol; 1990 Nov; 25(11):1228-31. PubMed ID: 1701419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.