These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25958828)

  • 1. Providing alternative reinforcers to facilitate tolerance to delayed reinforcement following functional communication training.
    Austin JE; Tiger JH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):663-8. PubMed ID: 25958828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Providing noncontingent, alternative, functional reinforcers during delays following functional communication training.
    Sumter ME; Gifford MR; Tiger JH; Effertz HM; Fulton CJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Sep; 53(4):2319-2329. PubMed ID: 32307714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Facilitating tolerance of delayed reinforcement during functional communication training.
    Fisher WW; Thompson RH; Hagopian LP; Bowman LG; Krug A
    Behav Modif; 2000 Jan; 24(1):3-29. PubMed ID: 10641365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decreasing excessive functional communication responses while treating destructive behavior using response restriction.
    Fisher WW; Greer BD; Querim AC; DeRosa N
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2614-23. PubMed ID: 25036315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A component analysis of schedule thinning during functional communication training.
    Betz AM; Fisher WW; Roane HS; Mintz JC; Owen TM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(1):219-41. PubMed ID: 24114096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DRA contingencies promote improved tolerance to delayed reinforcement during FCT compared to DRO and fixed-time schedules.
    Drifke MA; Tiger JH; Lillie MA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Jul; 53(3):1579-1592. PubMed ID: 32266724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An integrated model for guiding the selection of treatment components for problem behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement.
    Berg WK; Wacker DP; Ringdahl JE; Stricker J; Vinquist K; Salil Kumar Dutt A; Dolezal D; Luke J; Kemmerer L; Mews J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Sep; 49(3):617-38. PubMed ID: 26990962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Functional communication training with and without alternative reinforcement and punishment: an analysis of 58 applications.
    Rooker GW; Jessel J; Kurtz PF; Hagopian LP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2013 Dec; 46(4):708-22. PubMed ID: 24114463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Further Evaluation of the Use of Multiple Schedules for Behavior Maintained by Negative Reinforcement.
    Campos C; Leon Y; Sleiman A; Urcuyo B
    Behav Modif; 2017 Mar; 41(2):269-285. PubMed ID: 27680584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parametric analysis of delayed primary and conditioned reinforcers.
    Leon Y; Borrero JC; DeLeon IG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Sep; 49(3):639-55. PubMed ID: 27174440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A multicomponent approach to thinning reinforcer delivery during noncontingent reinforcement schedules.
    Slocum SK; Grauerholz-Fisher E; Peters KP; Vollmer TR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Jan; 51(1):61-69. PubMed ID: 29226346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Functional communication training during reinforcement schedule thinning: An analysis of 25 applications.
    Greer BD; Fisher WW; Saini V; Owen TM; Jones JK
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Mar; 49(1):105-21. PubMed ID: 26482103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Teaching self-control with qualitatively different reinforcers.
    Passage M; Tincani M; Hantula DA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2012; 45(4):853-7. PubMed ID: 23322941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noncontingent reinforcement as treatment for severe problem behavior: some procedural variations.
    Lalli JS; Casey SD; Kates K
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(1):127-36; quiz 136-7. PubMed ID: 9103988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of positive and negative reinforcement for compliance to treat problem behavior maintained by escape.
    Slocum SK; Vollmer TR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):563-74. PubMed ID: 25969379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of continuous and intermittent reinforcement for problem behavior during functional communication training.
    Worsdell AS; Iwata BA; Hanley GP; Thompson RH; Kahng SW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(2):167-79. PubMed ID: 10885525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of multiple-schedule variations to reduce high-rate requests in the picture exchange communication system.
    Landa R; Hanley GP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Jun; 49(2):388-93. PubMed ID: 26814152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of response preference on resistance to change.
    Ringdahl JE; Berg WK; Wacker DP; Crook K; Molony MA; Vargo KK; Neurnberger JE; Zabala K; Taylor CJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jan; 109(1):265-280. PubMed ID: 29319190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Schedule Thinning Following Functional Communication Training: Effects of Chained and Multiple Schedules.
    Nuhu NN; Pence ST
    Behav Modif; 2022 Sep; 46(5):1075-1108. PubMed ID: 34344228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differential reinforcement as treatment for behavior disorders: procedural and functional variations.
    Vollmer TR; Iwata BA
    Res Dev Disabil; 1992; 13(4):393-417. PubMed ID: 1509180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.