These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25959325)

  • 1. Human error identification for laparoscopic surgery: Development of a motion economy perspective.
    Al-Hakim L; Sevdalis N; Maiping T; Watanachote D; Sengupta S; Dissaranan C
    Appl Ergon; 2015 Sep; 50():113-25. PubMed ID: 25959325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Errors in laparoscopic surgery: what surgeons should know.
    Galleano R; Franceschi A; Ciciliot M; Falchero F; Cuschieri A
    Minerva Chir; 2011 Apr; 66(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 21593712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of passive polarizing three-dimensional displays on surgical performance for experienced laparoscopic surgeons.
    Smith R; Schwab K; Day A; Rockall T; Ballard K; Bailey M; Jourdan I
    Br J Surg; 2014 Oct; 101(11):1453-9. PubMed ID: 25131843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Error rating tool to identify and analyse technical errors and events in laparoscopic surgery.
    Bonrath EM; Zevin B; Dedy NJ; Grantcharov TP
    Br J Surg; 2013 Jul; 100(8):1080-8. PubMed ID: 23754649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterising 'near miss' events in complex laparoscopic surgery through video analysis.
    Bonrath EM; Gordon LE; Grantcharov TP
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2015 Aug; 24(8):516-21. PubMed ID: 25947330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Objective assessment of laparoscopic skills: dual-task approach.
    Meneghetti AT; Pachev G; Zheng B; Panton ON; Qayumi K
    Surg Innov; 2012 Dec; 19(4):452-9. PubMed ID: 22170894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A computer-based laparoscopic skills assessment device differentiates experienced from novice laparoscopic surgeons.
    McNatt SS; Smith CD
    Surg Endosc; 2001 Oct; 15(10):1085-9. PubMed ID: 11727075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of technical surgical errors during initial experience of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy by a group of Dutch pediatric surgeons.
    Tang B; Hanna GB; Bax NM; Cuschieri A
    Surg Endosc; 2004 Dec; 18(12):1716-20. PubMed ID: 15809778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.
    Chandra V; Nehra D; Parent R; Woo R; Reyes R; Hernandez-Boussard T; Dutta S
    Surgery; 2010 Jun; 147(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20045162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cutting errors in surgery: experience limits underestimation bias in a simulated surgical environment.
    Malhotra N; Poolton JM; Wilson MR; Masters RS
    J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(4):473-6. PubMed ID: 22677584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective.
    Way LW; Stewart L; Gantert W; Liu K; Lee CM; Whang K; Hunter JG
    Ann Surg; 2003 Apr; 237(4):460-9. PubMed ID: 12677139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ergonomic principles of task alignment, visual display, and direction of execution of laparoscopic bowel suturing.
    Emam TA; Hanna G; Cuschieri A
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Feb; 16(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 11967676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does box model training improve surgical dexterity and economy of movement during virtual reality laparoscopy? A randomised trial.
    Clevin L; Grantcharov TP
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 18158634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of cognitive distraction on performance of laparoscopic surgical tasks.
    Goodell KH; Cao CG; Schwaitzberg SD
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2006 Apr; 16(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 16646695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of modeling to identify vulnerabilities to human error in laparoscopy.
    Funk KH; Bauer JD; Doolen TL; Telasha D; Nicolalde RJ; Reeber M; Yodpijit N; Long M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(3):311-20. PubMed ID: 20227926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of comparative skills between hand-assisted and straight laparoscopic colorectal training on an augmented reality simulator.
    Leblanc F; Delaney CP; Neary PC; Rose J; Augestad KM; Senagore AJ; Ellis CN; Champagne BJ;
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Sep; 53(9):1323-7. PubMed ID: 20706077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of hand motion differentiates expert and novice surgeons.
    Uemura M; Tomikawa M; Kumashiro R; Miao T; Souzaki R; Ieiri S; Ohuchida K; Lefor AT; Hashizume M
    J Surg Res; 2014 May; 188(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 24418518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychomotor skills assessment in practicing surgeons experienced in performing advanced laparoscopic procedures.
    Gallagher AG; Smith CD; Bowers SP; Seymour NE; Pearson A; McNatt S; Hananel D; Satava RM
    J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Sep; 197(3):479-88. PubMed ID: 12946803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beyond task time: automated measurement augments fundamentals of laparoscopic skills methodology.
    Kowalewski TM; White LW; Lendvay TS; Jiang IS; Sweet R; Wright A; Hannaford B; Sinanan MN
    J Surg Res; 2014 Dec; 192(2):329-38. PubMed ID: 25108691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eye motion parameters correlate with level of experience in video-assisted surgery: objective testing of three tasks.
    Kocak E; Ober J; Berme N; Melvin WS
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2005 Dec; 15(6):575-80. PubMed ID: 16366861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.