BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25959446)

  • 21. Promoting fruit and vegetable consumption. Testing an intervention based on the theory of planned behaviour.
    Kothe EJ; Mullan BA; Butow P
    Appetite; 2012 Jun; 58(3):997-1004. PubMed ID: 22349778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predicting Australian adults' sun-safe behaviour: examining the role of personal and social norms.
    White KM; Starfelt LC; Young RM; Hawkes AL; Leske S; Hamilton K
    Br J Health Psychol; 2015 May; 20(2):396-412. PubMed ID: 24917299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Combining self-affirmation with implementation intentions to promote fruit and vegetable consumption.
    Harris PR; Brearley I; Sheeran P; Barker M; Klein WM; Creswell JD; Levine JM; Bond R
    Health Psychol; 2014 Jul; 33(7):729-36. PubMed ID: 24490648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A randomized trial of a brief intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intake: a replication study among callers to the CIS.
    Marcus AC; Heimendinger J; Wolfe P; Fairclough D; Rimer BK; Morra M; Warnecke R; Himes JH; Darrow SL; Davis SW; Julesberg K; Slevin-Perocchia R; Steelman M; Wooldridge J
    Prev Med; 2001 Sep; 33(3):204-16. PubMed ID: 11522161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Approach/avoidance motivation, message framing and skin cancer prevention: a test of the congruency hypothesis.
    Hevey D; Dolan M
    J Health Psychol; 2014 Aug; 19(8):1003-12. PubMed ID: 23682057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Minority talks: the influence of descriptive social norms on fruit intake.
    Stok FM; de Ridder DT; de Vet E; de Wit JB
    Psychol Health; 2012; 27(8):956-70. PubMed ID: 22149532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Social Norms and Identity Approach to Increasing Fruit and Vegetable Intake of Undergraduate Students in the United Kingdom.
    Fischera W; van Beusekom M; Higgs S; Cecil JE
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():838394. PubMed ID: 35656491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fighting obesity or obese persons? Public perceptions of obesity-related health messages.
    Puhl R; Peterson JL; Luedicke J
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2013 Jun; 37(6):774-82. PubMed ID: 22964792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. To frame or not to frame? Effects of message framing and risk priming on mouth rinse use and intention in an adult population-based sample.
    de Bruijn GJ
    J Behav Med; 2019 Apr; 42(2):300-314. PubMed ID: 30242597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Benefits of habit-based informational interventions: a randomised controlled trial of fruit and vegetable consumption.
    Rompotis CJ; Grove JR; Byrne SM
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2014 Jun; 38(3):247-52. PubMed ID: 24890483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How Does Health-Related Advertising with a Regulatory Focus and Goal Framing Affect Attitudes toward Ads and Healthy Behavior Intentions?
    Lin CY; Yeh WJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Dec; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 29207544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How norms work: self-identification, attitude, and self-efficacy mediate the relation between descriptive social norms and vegetable intake.
    Stok FM; Verkooijen KT; de Ridder DT; de Wit JB; de Vet E
    Appl Psychol Health Well Being; 2014 Jul; 6(2):230-50. PubMed ID: 24842712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Promoting change in meat consumption among the elderly: Factual and prefactual framing of health and well-being.
    Bertolotti M; Chirchiglia G; Catellani P
    Appetite; 2016 Nov; 106():37-47. PubMed ID: 26924560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How effective are messages and their characteristics in changing behavioural intentions to substitute plant-based foods for red meat? The mediating role of prior beliefs.
    Vainio A; Irz X; Hartikainen H
    Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():217-224. PubMed ID: 29447995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effects of social and health consequence framing on heavy drinking intentions among college students.
    Kingsbury JH; Gibbons FX; Gerrard M
    Br J Health Psychol; 2015 Feb; 20(1):212-20. PubMed ID: 24761786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ease of imagination, message framing, and physical activity messages.
    Berry TR; Carson V
    Br J Health Psychol; 2010 Feb; 15(Pt 1):197-211. PubMed ID: 19486550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The impact of age on goal-framing for health messages: The mediating effect of interest in health and emotion regulation.
    Masumoto K; Shiozaki M; Taishi N
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238989. PubMed ID: 32941521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evidence that implementation intentions reduce dietary fat intake: a randomized trial.
    Armitage CJ
    Health Psychol; 2004 May; 23(3):319-23. PubMed ID: 15099174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A brief intervention increases fruit and vegetable intake. A comparison of two intervention sequences.
    Lhakhang P; Godinho C; Knoll N; Schwarzer R
    Appetite; 2014 Nov; 82():103-10. PubMed ID: 25049137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Message framing, it does a body good: effects of message framing and motivational orientation on young women's calcium consumption.
    Gerend MA; Shepherd MA
    J Health Psychol; 2013 Oct; 18(10):1296-306. PubMed ID: 23180876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.