721 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25959784)
1. [Comparison of visual acuity and higher-order aberrations after standard and wavefront-guided myopic femtosecond LASIK].
Anderle R; Ventruba J; Š S
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2015 Jan; 71(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 25959784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of ocular higher-order aberrations after SMILE and Wavefront-guided Femtosecond LASIK for myopia.
Chen X; Wang Y; Zhang J; Yang SN; Li X; Zhang L
BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):42. PubMed ID: 28388896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Induced Higher-order aberrations after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) Performed with Wavefront-Guided IntraLase Femtosecond Laser in moderate to high Astigmatism.
Al-Zeraid FM; Osuagwu UL
BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Mar; 16():29. PubMed ID: 27000109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual acuity and higher-order aberrations with wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis.
Perez-Straziota CE; Randleman JB; Stulting RD
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Mar; 36(3):437-41. PubMed ID: 20202542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of visual acuity, higher-order aberrations and corneal asphericity after refractive lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis for myopia.
Kamiya K; Shimizu K; Igarashi A; Kobashi H; Komatsu M
Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 97(8):968-75. PubMed ID: 23269682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative analysis of visual outcomes and ocular aberrations following wavefront optimized and topography-guided customized femtosecond laser
Tiwari NN; Sachdev GS; Ramamurthy S; Dandapani R
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 66(11):1558-1561. PubMed ID: 30355860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors.
Li SM; Kang MT; Wang NL; Abariga SA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Dec; 12(12):CD012687. PubMed ID: 33336797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Corneal wavefront-guided customized laser in situ keratomileusis after penetrating keratoplasty.
Imamoglu S; Kaya V; Oral D; Perente I; Basarir B; Yilmaz OF
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 May; 40(5):785-92. PubMed ID: 24767912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety, efficacy, and predictability of laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia or myopic astigmatism with a 750 Hz scanning-spot laser system.
Tomita M; Watabe M; Yukawa S; Nakamura N; Nakamura T; Magnago T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Feb; 40(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 24345530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. One-year outcomes from a prospective, randomized, eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized LASIK in myopes.
Sáles CS; Manche EE
Ophthalmology; 2013 Dec; 120(12):2396-2402. PubMed ID: 23778091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective, Randomized, Contralateral Eye Comparison of Wavefront-Guided and Wavefront-Optimized Laser in Situ Keratomileusis.
Roe JR; Manche EE
Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 207():175-183. PubMed ID: 31173739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wavefront-optimized ablation versus topography-guided customized ablation in myopic LASIK: comparative study of higher order aberrations.
El Awady HE; Ghanem AA; Saleh SM
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011; 42(4):314-20. PubMed ID: 21534496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Wavefront-Guided LASIK Has Comparable Ocular and Corneal Aberrometric Outcomes but Better Visual Acuity Outcomes Than SMILE in Myopic Eyes.
Shetty R; Matalia H; Nandini C; Shetty A; Khamar P; Grover T; Sinha Roy A
J Refract Surg; 2018 Aug; 34(8):527-532. PubMed ID: 30089182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis and aspheric ablation profile with iris registration to correct myopia.
Wu J; Zhong X; Yang B; Wang Z; Yu K
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jul; 39(7):1059-65. PubMed ID: 23809945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visual outcomes after wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: Prospective comparison.
Moshirfar M; Schliesser JA; Chang JC; Oberg TJ; Mifflin MD; Townley R; Livingston MK; Kurz CJ
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1336-43. PubMed ID: 20656157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Topography-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: Surgical outcomes.
Kim J; Choi SH; Lim DH; Yang CM; Yoon GJ; Chung TY
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Jul; 45(7):959-965. PubMed ID: 31196580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of ocular aberrations measured by a Fourier-based Hartmann-Shack and Zernike-based Tscherning aberrometer before and after laser in situ keratomileusis.
Sáles CS; Manche EE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1820-5. PubMed ID: 26603389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Femtosecond Laser-assisted Wavefront-guided LASIK Using a Newer Generation Aberrometer: 1-Year Results.
Prakash G; Srivastava D; Suhail M
J Refract Surg; 2015 Sep; 31(9):600-6. PubMed ID: 26352565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wavefront-guided and aspheric ablation for myopia -- one-year results of the zyoptix personalized treatment advanced algorithm.
Ryan A; O'Keefe M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 153(6):1169-77.e2. PubMed ID: 22330308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single versus double femtosecond laser pass for incomplete laser in situ keratomileusis flap in contralateral eyes: visual and optical outcomes.
Muñoz G; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Javaloy J; García-Lázaro S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jan; 38(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 22153090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
