These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25960283)

  • 1. Pregnancy with a pinhole introitus: A report of two cases and a review of the literature.
    Mistry H; Jha S
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2015; 20(6):490-4. PubMed ID: 25960283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deinfibulation for preventing or treating complications in women living with type III female genital mutilation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Okusanya BO; Oduwole O; Nwachuku N; Meremikwu MM
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Feb; 136 Suppl 1():13-20. PubMed ID: 28164296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Antepartum or intrapartum deinfibulation for childbirth in women with type III female genital mutilation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Esu E; Udo A; Okusanya BO; Agamse D; Meremikwu MM
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Feb; 136 Suppl 1():21-29. PubMed ID: 28164285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Management of type III female genital mutilation in Birmingham, UK: a retrospective audit.
    Paliwal P; Ali S; Bradshaw S; Hughes A; Jolly K
    Midwifery; 2014 Mar; 30(3):282-8. PubMed ID: 23747293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combating female genital mutilation: an agenda for the next decade.
    Dorkenoo E
    World Health Stat Q; 1996; 49(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 9050193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preferences for deinfibulation (opening) surgery and female genital mutilation service provision: A qualitative study.
    Jones LL; Costello BD; Danks E; Jolly K; Cross-Sudworth F; Byrne A; Fassam-Wright M; Latthe P; Clarke J; Adbi A; Abdi H; Abdi H; Taylor J
    BJOG; 2023 Apr; 130(5):531-540. PubMed ID: 36572653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effectiveness of surgical interventions for women with FGM/C: a systematic review.
    Berg RC; Taraldsen S; Said MA; Sørbye IK; Vangen S
    BJOG; 2018 Feb; 125(3):278-287. PubMed ID: 28755440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The experiences and psychological outcomes for pregnant women who have had FGM: A systematic review.
    Wood R; Richens Y; Lavender T
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2021 Sep; 29():100639. PubMed ID: 34051456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Female genital mutilation reversal: a general approach.
    Anand M; Stanhope TJ; Occhino JA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Jul; 25(7):985-6. PubMed ID: 24448727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reasons for and Experiences With Surgical Interventions for Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C): A Systematic Review.
    Berg RC; Taraldsen S; Said MA; Sørbye IK; Vangen S
    J Sex Med; 2017 Aug; 14(8):977-990. PubMed ID: 28666656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Type III female genital mutilation: clinical implications and treatment by carbon dioxide laser surgery.
    Penna C; Fallani MG; Fambrini M; Zipoli E; Marchionni M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 187(6):1550-4. PubMed ID: 12501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Management of type III female genital mutilation].
    Collinet P; Sabban F; Lucot JP; Boukerrou M; Stien L; Leroy JL
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2004 Dec; 33(8):720-4. PubMed ID: 15687943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long term health consequences of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM).
    Reisel D; Creighton SM
    Maturitas; 2015 Jan; 80(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 25466303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Female genital mutilation among antenatal care and contraceptive advice attendees in Sweden.
    Litorp H; Franck M; Almroth L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(7):716-22. PubMed ID: 18607822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Female genital mutilation and pregnancy: associated risks.
    Gayle C; Rymer J
    Br J Nurs; 2016 Sep; 25(17):978-983. PubMed ID: 27666099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Female genital mutilation: a reproductive health concern.
    Kiragu K
    Popul Rep J; 1995 Oct; (41 Suppl):1-4. PubMed ID: 8654884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Injured bodies, damaged lives: experiences and narratives of Kenyan women with obstetric fistula and Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting.
    Mwanri L; Gatwiri GJ
    Reprod Health; 2017 Mar; 14(1):38. PubMed ID: 28288664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Obstetric outcomes for women with female genital mutilation at an Australian hospital, 2006-2012: a descriptive study.
    Varol N; Dawson A; Turkmani S; Hall JJ; Nanayakkara S; Jenkins G; Homer CS; McGeechan K
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Oct; 16(1):328. PubMed ID: 27793119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Type I female genital mutilation: a cause of completely closed vagina.
    Rouzi AA; Sahly N; Alhachim E; Abduljabbar H
    J Sex Med; 2014 Sep; 11(9):2351-3. PubMed ID: 24889198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Female genital mutilation (FGM) management during pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum period.
    Rushwan H
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2000 Jul; 70(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 10884538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.