343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25960411)
1. Heterogeneity in D'Amico classification-based low-risk prostate cancer: Differences in upgrading and upstaging according to active surveillance eligibility.
Schiffmann J; Wenzel P; Salomon G; Budäus L; Schlomm T; Minner S; Wittmer C; Kraft S; Krech T; Steurer S; Sauter G; Beyer B; Boehm K; Tilki D; Michl U; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
Urol Oncol; 2015 Jul; 33(7):329.e13-9. PubMed ID: 25960411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of pathological upstaging or upgrading on metastasis and cancer-specific mortality in men with clinical low-risk prostate cancer.
Kovac E; Vertosick EA; Sjoberg DD; Vickers AJ; Stephenson AJ
BJU Int; 2018 Dec; 122(6):1003-1009. PubMed ID: 29802773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pathologic Outcomes of Gleason 6 Favorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Yang DD; Mahal BA; Muralidhar V; Vastola ME; Boldbaatar N; Labe SA; Nezolosky MD; Orio PF; King MT; Martin NE; Mouw KW; Trinh QD; Nguyen PL
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Jun; 16(3):226-234. PubMed ID: 29196209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary Gleason pattern upgrading in contemporary patients with D'Amico low-risk prostate cancer: implications for future biomarkers and imaging modalities.
Leyh-Bannurah SR; Abou-Haidar H; Dell'Oglio P; Schiffmann J; Tian Z; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Budäus L; Karakiewicz PI
BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):692-699. PubMed ID: 27367469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
Vellekoop A; Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Stattin P
J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 24071481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk of Upgrading and Upstaging Among 10 000 Patients with Gleason 3+4 Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer.
Yang DD; Mahal BA; Muralidhar V; Nezolosky MD; Vastola ME; Labe SA; Boldbaatar N; King MT; Martin NE; Orio PF; Beard CJ; Hoffman KE; Trinh QD; Spratt DE; Feng FY; Nguyen PL
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Jan; 5(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 28753811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The pathological upgrading after radical prostatectomy in low-risk prostate cancer patients who are eligible for active surveillance: How safe is it to depend on bioptic pathology?
Verep S; Erdem S; Ozluk Y; Kilicaslan I; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Prostate; 2019 Sep; 79(13):1523-1529. PubMed ID: 31269285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A proposal of a new nomogram for predicting upstaging in contemporary D'Amico low-risk prostate cancer patients.
Leyh-Bannurah SR; Dell'Oglio P; Tian Z; Schiffmann J; Shariat SF; Suardi N; Francesco M; Alberto B; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Budäus L; Karakiewicz PI
World J Urol; 2017 Feb; 35(2):189-197. PubMed ID: 27289238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Higher rates of upgrading and upstaging in older patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and qualifying for active surveillance.
Busch J; Magheli A; Leva N; Ferrari M; Kramer J; Klopf C; Kempkensteffen C; Miller K; Brooks JD; Gonzalgo ML
BJU Int; 2014 Oct; 114(4):517-21. PubMed ID: 24112652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adverse Disease Features in Gleason Score 3 + 4 "Favorable Intermediate-Risk" Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Gearman DJ; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2017 Sep; 72(3):442-447. PubMed ID: 27574819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes of men with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level as their sole preoperative intermediate- or high-risk feature.
Faisal FA; Sundi D; Pierorazio PM; Ball MW; Humphreys EB; Han M; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Carter HB; Bivalacqua TJ; Schaeffer EM; Ross AE
BJU Int; 2014 Dec; 114(6b):E120-E129. PubMed ID: 24731026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What is the optimal definition of misclassification in patients with very low-risk prostate cancer eligible for active surveillance? Results from a multi-institutional series.
Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Isbarn H; Suardi N; De Visschere PJ; Futterer JJ; Ghadjar P; Massard C; Ost P; Sooriakumaran P; Surcel CI; van der Bergh RC; Montorsi F; Ficarra V; Giannarini G; Briganti A;
Urol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 33(4):164.e1-9. PubMed ID: 25620154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of predictors of unfavorable pathological features in men eligible for active surveillance using radical prostatectomy specimens: a multi-institutional study.
Mizuno K; Inoue T; Kinoshita H; Yano T; Kawanishi H; Kanda H; Terada N; Kobayashi T; Kamba T; Mikami Y; Shiraishi T; Uemura Y; Imai Y; Honjo G; Shirase T; Okumura K; Kawakita M; Ogura K; Sugimura Y; Matsuda T; Ogawa O
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2016 Dec; 46(12):1156-1161. PubMed ID: 27744325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. No detrimental effect of a positive family history on postoperative upgrading and upstaging in men with low risk and favourable intermediate-risk prostate cancer: implications for active surveillance.
Herkommer K; Maier N; Ankerst DP; Schiele S; Gschwend JE; Meissner VH
World J Urol; 2021 Jul; 39(7):2499-2506. PubMed ID: 33048258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility for active surveillance in biopsy Gleason 3 + 4 prostate cancer: an Australian radical prostatectomy cohort.
Wong LM; Tang V; Peters J; Costello A; Corcoran N
BJU Int; 2016 Apr; 117 Suppl 4():82-7. PubMed ID: 27094971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pathologic Outcomes of Candidates for Active Surveillance Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Contemporary Turkish Patient Cohort.
Tinay I; Aslan G; Kural AR; Özen H; Akdoğan B; Yıldırım A; Ongün Ş; Özkan A; Esen T; Zorlu F; Dillioğlugil Ö; Bekiroglu N; Türkeri L;
Urol Int; 2018; 100(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 29275406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low serum total testosterone level as a predictor of upstaging and upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer patients meeting the inclusion criteria for active surveillance.
Ferro M; Lucarelli G; Bruzzese D; Di Lorenzo G; Perdonà S; Autorino R; Cantiello F; La Rocca R; Busetto GM; Cimmino A; Buonerba C; Battaglia M; Damiano R; De Cobelli O; Mirone V; Terracciano D
Oncotarget; 2017 Mar; 8(11):18424-18434. PubMed ID: 27793023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.
Keefe DT; Schieda N; El Hallani S; Breau RH; Morash C; Robertson SJ; Mai KT; Belanger EC; Flood TA
Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; 467(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26229020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
Jin BS; Kang SH; Kim DY; Oh HG; Kim CI; Moon GH; Kwon TG; Park JS
Korean J Urol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):624-9. PubMed ID: 26366274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
