These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25960635)

  • 1. A novel misoprostol delivery system for induction of labor: clinical utility and patient considerations.
    Stephenson ML; Wing DA
    Drug Des Devel Ther; 2015; 9():2321-7. PubMed ID: 25960635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor: a delivery system with accurate dosing and rapid discontinuation.
    Stephenson ML; Hawkins JS; Powers BL; Wing DA
    Womens Health (Lond); 2014 Jan; 10(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 24328596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Misoprostol for induction of labor.
    Stephenson ML; Wing DA
    Semin Perinatol; 2015 Oct; 39(6):459-62. PubMed ID: 26601733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determining dose and endpoints of a controlled-release misoprostol vaginal insert for a phase III trial.
    Wing DA; Powers BL; Rayburn WF
    J Reprod Med; 2008 Sep; 53(9):695-6. PubMed ID: 18839824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Misoprostol dose selection in a controlled-release vaginal insert for induction of labor in nulliparous women.
    Castañeda CS; Izquierdo Puente JC; Leon Ochoa RA; Plasse TF; Powers BL; Rayburn WF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):1071-5. PubMed ID: 16157114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vaginal misoprostol in managing premature rupture of membranes.
    Ayad IA
    East Mediterr Health J; 2002; 8(4-5):515-20. PubMed ID: 15603033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: misoprostol vs oxytocin.
    Fonseca L; Wood HC; Lucas MJ; Ramin SM; Phatak D; Gilstrap LC; Yeomans ER
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 199(3):305.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18771993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Neiger R; Greaves PC
    Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Balancing the efficacy and safety of misoprostol: a meta-analysis comparing 25 versus 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour.
    McMaster K; Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM
    BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):468-76. PubMed ID: 24989790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of different doses of intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Saxena P; Puri M; Bajaj M; Mishra A; Trivedi SS
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2011 Jul; 15(7):759-63. PubMed ID: 21780543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
    Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
    BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction.
    Garry D; Figueroa R; Kalish RB; Catalano CJ; Maulik D
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Apr; 13(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 12854927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparative study of the effect of intravaginal misoprostol at 50 and 100 micrograms in cervical ripening and labor induction].
    Reyna-Villasmil E; Guerra-Velásquez M; Torres-Montilla M; Reyna-Villasmil N; Mejia-Montilla J; Labarca-Vincero N
    Invest Clin; 2005 Jun; 46(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 16001749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized prospective placebo-controlled study.
    Zahran KM; Shahin AY; Abdellah MS; Elsayh KI
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1054-60. PubMed ID: 20144171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of extra-amniotic Foley's catheter and vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone on cervical ripening and induction of labor in Kenya, a randomized controlled trial.
    Osoti A; Kibii DK; Tong TMK; Maranga I
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Jul; 18(1):300. PubMed ID: 30001195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outpatient cervical ripening.
    Amorosa JM; Stone JL
    Semin Perinatol; 2015 Oct; 39(6):488-94. PubMed ID: 26365009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness and safety of a new vaginal misoprostol product specifically labeled for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Cecatti JG; Tedesco RP; Pires HM; Calderon IM; Faúndes A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(6):706-11. PubMed ID: 16752263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.