These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25960880)

  • 1. Intensive care unit scoring systems outperform emergency department scoring systems for mortality prediction in critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study.
    Moseson EM; Zhuo H; Chu J; Stein JC; Matthay MA; Kangelaris KN; Liu KD; Calfee CS
    J Intensive Care; 2014; 2():40. PubMed ID: 25960880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III scoring system in predicting mortality and length of stay at surgical intensive care unit.
    Gilani MT; Razavi M; Azad AM
    Niger Med J; 2014 Mar; 55(2):144-7. PubMed ID: 24791049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Internal Validation of the Predictive Performance of Models Based on Three ED and ICU Scoring Systems to Predict Inhospital Mortality for Intensive Care Patients Referred from the Emergency Department.
    Rahmatinejad Z; Hoseini B; Rahmatinejad F; Abu-Hanna A; Bergquist R; Pourmand A; Miri M; Eslami S
    Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():3964063. PubMed ID: 35509709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation and Validation of Four Scoring Systems: the APACHE IV, SAPS III, MPM0 II, and ICMM in Critically Ill Cancer Patients.
    Siddiqui SS; Narkhede AM; Kulkarni AP; Prabu NR; Chaudhari HK; Sarode SV; Divatia JV
    Indian J Crit Care Med; 2020 Apr; 24(4):263-269. PubMed ID: 32565637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Four Severity Assessment Scoring Systems in Critically Ill Patients for Predicting Patient Outcomes: A Prospective Observational Study From a Single Tertiary Center in Central India.
    Mishra S; Swain AK; Tharwani S; Kumar D; Meshram S; Shukla A
    Cureus; 2024 Aug; 16(8):e66268. PubMed ID: 39238710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of four early warning scores in predicting the prognosis of critically ill patients in secondary hospitals].
    Su X; Zhang H; Yuan W; Yi M; Fu C; Jiang J; Gao H
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2023 Oct; 35(10):1093-1098. PubMed ID: 37873716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison of national early warning score, rapid emergency medicine score and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score for predicting outcome among emergency severe patients].
    Chen L; Deng L; Zhao H; Huang X; He X; Li X; Liu B; Xie Y
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2017 Dec; 29(12):1092-1096. PubMed ID: 29216942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Clinical characteristics of critically ill pregnant women with different admission methods to intensive care unit: data analysis from 2006 to 2019 in the university hospital].
    Xi J; Ren H; Zhang H; Zhao Z; Wang T; Wang Z; Li W; Bo S; Yao G; Zhao Y; Wang Y; Ge Q
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2021 Oct; 33(10):1249-1254. PubMed ID: 34955137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Critical care in the emergency department: A physiologic assessment and outcome evaluation.
    Nguyen HB; Rivers EP; Havstad S; Knoblich B; Ressler JA; Muzzin AM; Tomlanovich MC
    Acad Emerg Med; 2000 Dec; 7(12):1354-61. PubMed ID: 11099425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The comparison of modified early warning score with rapid emergency medicine score: a prospective multicentre observational cohort study on medical and surgical patients presenting to emergency department.
    Bulut M; Cebicci H; Sigirli D; Sak A; Durmus O; Top AA; Kaya S; Uz K
    Emerg Med J; 2014 Jun; 31(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 23562988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Common intensive care scoring systems do not outperform age and glasgow coma scale score in predicting mid-term mortality in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage treated in the intensive care unit.
    Fallenius M; Skrifvars MB; Reinikainen M; Bendel S; Raj R
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2017 Oct; 25(1):102. PubMed ID: 29070068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation IV (APACHE IV) severity of illness scoring systems, in a multidisciplinary ICU.
    Varghese YE; Kalaiselvan MS; Renuka MK; Arunkumar AS
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2017; 33(2):248-253. PubMed ID: 28781454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance in mortality prediction of SAPS 3 And MPM-III scores among adult patients admitted to the ICU of a private tertiary referral hospital in Tanzania: a retrospective cohort study.
    Kassam N; Aghan E; Somji S; Aziz O; Orwa J; Surani SR
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e12332. PubMed ID: 34820169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Predictive value of six critical illness scores for 28-day death risk in comprehensive and specialized intensive care unit patients based on MIMIC-IV database].
    Zhu S; Chen H; Li X; Gulifeire T; Wang Y; Yang C; Yu X
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2022 Jul; 34(7):752-758. PubMed ID: 36100416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance evaluation of APACHE II score for an Indian patient with respiratory problems.
    Gupta R; Arora VK
    Indian J Med Res; 2004 Jun; 119(6):273-82. PubMed ID: 15243165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the rapid emergency medicine score and APACHE II in nonsurgical emergency department patients.
    Olsson T; Lind L
    Acad Emerg Med; 2003 Oct; 10(10):1040-8. PubMed ID: 14525735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of the sequential organ failure assessment, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II, and simplified acute physiology score II prognostic scoring systems in paraquat-poisoned patients in the intensive care unit.
    Lee JH; Hwang SY; Kim HR; Kim YW; Kang MJ; Cho KW; Lee DW; Kim YH
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2017 May; 36(5):431-437. PubMed ID: 27387349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of the third-generation models of severity scoring systems (APACHE IV, SAPS 3 and MPM-III) in acute kidney injury critically ill patients.
    Costa e Silva VT; de Castro I; Liaño F; Muriel A; Rodríguez-Palomares JR; Yu L
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2011 Dec; 26(12):3894-901. PubMed ID: 21505093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparing the performance of three severity scoring systems for ICU patients: APACHE III, SAPS II, MPM II].
    Kim EK; Kwon YD; Hwang JH
    J Prev Med Public Health; 2005 Aug; 38(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 16323627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of outcome in intensive care unit trauma patients: a multicenter study of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE), Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS), and a 24-hour intensive care unit (ICU) point system.
    Vassar MJ; Lewis FR; Chambers JA; Mullins RJ; O'Brien PE; Weigelt JA; Hoang MT; Holcroft JW
    J Trauma; 1999 Aug; 47(2):324-9. PubMed ID: 10452468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.