These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
12. Peer reviewers need more nurturing. Catlow R Nature; 2017 Dec; 552(7685):293. PubMed ID: 29293240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Sitting in judgement. Check E Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6905):332-3. PubMed ID: 12353003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time. Clarke SP Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Dec; 38(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 17342873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Science and sexism: In the eye of the Twitterstorm. Morello L Nature; 2015 Nov; 527(7577):148-51. PubMed ID: 26560281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Academics seek to cast peer review as a public service. Butler D Nature; 2004 Jul; 430(6995):7. PubMed ID: 15229573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. No researcher is too junior to fix science. Tregoning J Nature; 2017 May; 545(7652):7. PubMed ID: 28470218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Three cheers for peers. Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The politics of publication. Lawrence PA Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):259-61. PubMed ID: 12646895 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Peer review: recognition via year-end statements. van Loon AJ Nature; 2003 May; 423(6936):116. PubMed ID: 12736656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]