These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25961086)
21. Research integrity: Don't let transparency damage science. Lewandowsky S; Bishop D Nature; 2016 Jan; 529(7587):459-61. PubMed ID: 26819029 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Impact factors aren't top journals' sole attraction. Törnqvist TE Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):480. PubMed ID: 12774096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Double-blind review: the paw print is a giveaway. Naqvi KR Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):28. PubMed ID: 18322504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Collaborating for success in research. Gastroenterol Nurs; 2007; 30(3):246-7. PubMed ID: 17568268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Public health research personnel and health and prevention program personnel: an impossible marriage? The example of research in adolescent health]. Michaud PA Rev Med Suisse Romande; 2000 Oct; 120(10):821-6. PubMed ID: 11109913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Nurses & the use of social media. Crawford J Beginnings; 2011; 31(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 22439464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Nursing and Social media 101. Christiano C Beginnings; 2011; 31(4):4-6. PubMed ID: 22439463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Criticism: what to do about science's bad public image? Striepen B Nature; 2006 Nov; 444(7117):265. PubMed ID: 17108938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Embrace research: ophthalmology's future is now! Smith SC Insight; 2010; 35(2):4. PubMed ID: 20545221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Challenges of setting up a multi-centred research study. Twycross A; Corlett J Nurs Stand; 2007 Aug 15-21; 21(49):35-8. PubMed ID: 17844903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Conferences for researchers--why meet? O'Connor M Int J Palliat Nurs; 2004 Jun; 10(6):278. PubMed ID: 15284622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Gender bias goes away when grant reviewers focus on the science. Guglielmi G Nature; 2018 Feb; 554(7690):14-15. PubMed ID: 29388971 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Social media and midwives: what is appropriate? George L Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2012; (102):48-9. PubMed ID: 22856082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Scandals stem from the low priority of peer review. Connerade JP Nature; 2004 Jan; 427(6971):196. PubMed ID: 14724609 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The Ten Commandments of Research--one nurse scientist's perspective. Miaskowski C Commun Nurs Res; 2006; 39():55-68. PubMed ID: 16729517 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Reviewing should be shown in publication list. Clausen T; Nielsen OB Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6924):689. PubMed ID: 12610595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Five rules for evidence communication. Blastland M; Freeman ALJ; van der Linden S; Marteau TM; Spiegelhalter D Nature; 2020 Nov; 587(7834):362-364. PubMed ID: 33208954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Training peer reviewers. Mackey DA Nature; 2006 Oct; 443(7113):880. PubMed ID: 17106961 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Unscientific practice flourishes in science. Smith R BMJ; 1998 Apr; 316(7137):1036. PubMed ID: 9552902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]