These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25961281)

  • 1. Implied actions between paired objects lead to affordance selection by inhibition.
    Xu S; Humphreys GW; Heinke D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):1021-36. PubMed ID: 25961281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dorsal and ventral stream contribution to the paired-object affordance effect.
    Roux-Sibilon A; Kalénine S; Pichat C; Peyrin C
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Apr; 112():125-134. PubMed ID: 29522759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selecting object pairs for action: Is the active object always first?
    Laverick R; Wulff M; Honisch JJ; Chua WL; Wing AM; Rotshtein P
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Aug; 233(8):2269-81. PubMed ID: 25929555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Motor inhibition associated with the affordance of briefly displayed objects.
    Vainio L; Hammaren L; Hausen M; Rekolainen E; Riskila S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1094-110. PubMed ID: 21279867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The involvement of the dorsal stream in processing implied actions between paired objects: A TMS study.
    Xu S; Humphreys GW; Mevorach C; Heinke D
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 95():240-249. PubMed ID: 28034601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Location-coding account versus affordance-activation account in handle-to-hand correspondence effects: Evidence of Simon-like effects based on the coding of action direction.
    Pellicano A; Koch I; Binkofski F
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1647-1666. PubMed ID: 28414500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of paired-object affordance in search tasks across the adult lifespan.
    Wulff M; Stainton A; Rotshtein P
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Jun; 105():22-33. PubMed ID: 27045450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sidestepping spatial confounds in object-based correspondence effects: The Bimanual Affordance Task (BMAT).
    Azaad S; Laham SM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Nov; 72(11):2605-2613. PubMed ID: 31066635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Automaticity of Affordance of Dangerous Object.
    Zhao L
    Span J Psychol; 2016 Nov; 19():E74. PubMed ID: 27806742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Action-related objects influence the distribution of visuospatial attention.
    Roberts KL; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):669-88. PubMed ID: 21113857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Faster recognition of graspable targets defined by orientation in a visual search task.
    Bamford LE; Klassen NR; Karl JM
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Apr; 238(4):905-916. PubMed ID: 32170332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of the action context in object affordance.
    Zhao L
    Psychol Res; 2019 Mar; 83(2):227-234. PubMed ID: 29610980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating Object Affordance in People with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: No Alterations in the Automatic Activation of Motor Plans.
    Ten Brink AF; España MF; Navarro V; Dijkerman HC; Bultitude JH
    J Pain; 2024 Jul; 25(7):104479. PubMed ID: 38246251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of attention in the occurrence of the affordance effect.
    Riggio L; Iani C; Gherri E; Benatti F; Rubichi S; Nicoletti R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):449-58. PubMed ID: 17905141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Time course of motor affordances evoked by pictured objects and words.
    Bub DN; Masson MEJ; Kumar R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):53-68. PubMed ID: 28447845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of response type on affordance and spatial compatibility effects in human and object interactions.
    Demir P; Sandıkçı M; Demir E; Soyman E
    Br J Psychol; 2024 Nov; 115(4):787-808. PubMed ID: 39096300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mug handle affordance and automatic response inhibition: behavioural and electrophysiological evidence.
    Vainio L; Ala-Salomäki H; Huovilainen T; Nikkinen H; Salo M; Väliaho J; Paavilainen P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(9):1697-719. PubMed ID: 24266417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do silhouettes and photographs produce fundamentally different object-based correspondence effects?
    Proctor RW; Lien MC; Thompson L
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():91-101. PubMed ID: 28865287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Graspable Objects Grab Attention More Than Images Do.
    Gomez MA; Skiba RM; Snow JC
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Feb; 29(2):206-218. PubMed ID: 29215960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Time Course of Response Activation with Dangerous Objects.
    Zhao L
    Span J Psychol; 2018 Jul; 21():E27. PubMed ID: 30056821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.