These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25961357)

  • 1. Does testing impair relational processing? Failed attempts to replicate the negative testing effect.
    Rawson KA; Wissman KT; Vaughn KE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1326-36. PubMed ID: 25961357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The replicability of the negative testing effect: Differences across participant populations.
    Mulligan NW; Rawson KA; Peterson DJ; Wissman KT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):752-763. PubMed ID: 29094992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Negative and positive testing effects in terms of item-specific and relational information.
    Mulligan NW; Peterson DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):859-71. PubMed ID: 25181496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Establishing and explaining the testing effect in free recall for young children.
    Lipowski SL; Pyc MA; Dunlosky J; Rawson KA
    Dev Psychol; 2014 Apr; 50(4):994-1000. PubMed ID: 24294884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of the encoding factors that produce the negative repetition effect.
    Mulligan NW; Peterson DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):765-75. PubMed ID: 24548323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why is test-restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis.
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):737-46. PubMed ID: 22060276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The negative testing effect and multifactor account.
    Peterson DJ; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1287-93. PubMed ID: 23421505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm.
    Huff MJ; Bodner GE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1246-56. PubMed ID: 23356241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: a meta-analytic review of the testing effect.
    Rowland CA
    Psychol Bull; 2014 Nov; 140(6):1432-63. PubMed ID: 25150680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.
    Halamish V; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The negative repetition effect.
    Mulligan NW; Peterson DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1403-16. PubMed ID: 23421508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sleep can reduce the testing effect: it enhances recall of restudied items but can leave recall of retrieved items unaffected.
    Bäuml KH; Holterman C; Abel M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1568-81. PubMed ID: 24933697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When does generation enhance memory for location?
    Marsh EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1216-20. PubMed ID: 16938059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reversing the testing effect by feedback: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Pastötter B; Bäuml KH
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 16(3):473-88. PubMed ID: 26857480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing and feedback effects on front-end control over later retrieval.
    Thomas RC; McDaniel MA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):437-50. PubMed ID: 22732026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing the limits of testing effects using completion tests.
    Hinze SR; Wiley J
    Memory; 2011 Apr; 19(3):290-304. PubMed ID: 21500089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An item gains and losses analysis of false memories suggests critical items receive more item-specific processing than list items.
    Burns DJ; Martens NJ; Bertoni AA; Sweeney EJ; Lividini MD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 16569146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enactment enhances integration between verb and noun, but not relational processing, in episodic memory.
    von Essen JD
    Scand J Psychol; 2005 Aug; 46(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 16014075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contextual match and cue-independence of retrieval-induced forgetting: Testing the prediction of the model by Norman, Newman, and Detre (2007).
    Hanczakowski M; Mazzoni G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):953-8. PubMed ID: 23088549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect.
    Carpenter SK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1547-52. PubMed ID: 21707217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.