These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25961358)

  • 21. Interference and Inhibition in Bilingual Language Comprehension: Evidence from Polish-English Interlingual Homographs.
    Durlik J; Szewczyk J; Muszyński M; Wodniecka Z
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151430. PubMed ID: 26977810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Behavioral and neural evidence on the processing of ambiguous adjective-noun dependencies in Korean sentence comprehension.
    Nam Y; Hong U
    Brain Lang; 2019 Jan; 188():28-41. PubMed ID: 30557776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Processing coordinate structures in Chinese: evidence from eye movements.
    Qingrong C; Yan H
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e35517. PubMed ID: 22558163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Semantic memory and verbal working memory correlates of N400 to subordinate homographs.
    Salisbury DF
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Jul; 55(2):396-9. PubMed ID: 15177821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The multiple-lemma representation of Italian compound nouns: a single case study of deep dyslexia.
    Marelli M; Aggujaro S; Molteni F; Luzzatti C
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Apr; 50(5):852-61. PubMed ID: 22300880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Task effects on eye movements during reading.
    Kaakinen JK; Hyönä J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 20854008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Limitations on the use of verb information during sentence comprehension.
    Kennison SM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Mar; 8(1):132-8. PubMed ID: 11340858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The time-course of lexical and structural processes in sentence comprehension.
    Tily H; Fedorenko E; Gibson E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):910-27. PubMed ID: 19746299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Nouns and verbs in the brain: grammatical class and task specific effects as revealed by fMRI.
    Berlingeri M; Crepaldi D; Roberti R; Scialfa G; Luzzatti C; Paulesu E
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008 Jun; 25(4):528-58. PubMed ID: 19086201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How readers process syntactic input depends on their goals.
    Vandendaele A; Declerck M; Grainger J; Snell J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Feb; 203():103006. PubMed ID: 31955032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading.
    Morris RK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Jan; 20(1):92-103. PubMed ID: 8138791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In search of on-line locality effects in sentence comprehension.
    Bartek B; Lewis RL; Vasishth S; Smith MR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1178-98. PubMed ID: 21707210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Involvement of cognitive control in sentence comprehension: evidence from ERPs.
    Ye Z; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2008 Apr; 1203():103-15. PubMed ID: 18313650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Is children's reading "good enough"? Links between online processing and comprehension as children read syntactically ambiguous sentences.
    Wonnacott E; Joseph HS; Adelman JS; Nation K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):855-79. PubMed ID: 25774745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. To mind the mind: an event-related potential study of word class and semantic ambiguity.
    Lee CL; Federmeier KD
    Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1081(1):191-202. PubMed ID: 16516169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of sense-contingent argument structure frequencies on ambiguity resolution in aphasia.
    Huck A; Thompson RL; Cruice M; Marshall J
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jun; 100():171-194. PubMed ID: 28392303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The hardest butter to button: immediate context effects in spoken word identification.
    Brock J; Nation K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(1):114-23. PubMed ID: 23745798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Children's and adults' on-line processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences during reading.
    Joseph HS; Liversedge SP
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e54141. PubMed ID: 23349807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.