These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25961619)

  • 1. Apical extrusion of Enterococcus faecalis using three different rotary instrumentation techniques: an in vitro study.
    Taneja S; Kumari M; Barua M; Dudeja C; Malik M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 25961619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Apical Extrusion of Intracanal Bacteria following use of Two Engine-driven Instrumentation Techniques: An in vitro Study.
    Mohammed N; Noushad MC; Balan B; Dhanesh N; Jayasheelan N; Revankar VD
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Nov; 17(11):939-942. PubMed ID: 27965505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Comparison of Apical Bacterial Extrusion in Manual, ProTaper Rotary, and One Shape Rotary Instrumentation Techniques.
    Mittal R; Singla MG; Garg A; Dhawan A
    J Endod; 2015 Dec; 41(12):2040-4. PubMed ID: 26472680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of two engine-driven instrumentation techniques.
    Er K; Sümer Z; Akpinar KE
    Int Endod J; 2005 Dec; 38(12):871-6. PubMed ID: 16343113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of Instrumentation Techniques and Preparation Taper on Apical Extrusion of Bacteria.
    Aksel H; Küçükkaya Eren S; Çakar A; Serper A; Özkuyumcu C; Azim AA
    J Endod; 2017 Jun; 43(6):1008-1010. PubMed ID: 28416303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of various instrumentation techniques.
    Kuştarci A; Akpinar KE; Sümer Z; Er K; Bek B
    Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19133095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of working length and apical preparation size on apical bacterial extrusion during reciprocating instrumentation.
    Teixeira JM; Cunha FM; Jesus RO; Silva EJ; Fidel SR; Sassone LM
    Int Endod J; 2015 Jul; 48(7):648-53. PubMed ID: 25087922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro evaluation of apical extrusion of bacteria following use of new rotary instrumentation system.
    Mohammadi Z
    N Y State Dent J; 2009 Apr; 75(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 19548490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria using rotary ProTaper, K3XF, twisted and hand K-file system: An ex vivo study.
    Ghogre P; Chourasia HR; Agarwal M; Singh MP; Gurav S; Ghogre R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(4):406-10. PubMed ID: 26481889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria using ProTaper Next, Mtwo, and ProTaper rotary systems: An
    Polineni S; Damaraju B; Bolla N; Sunil C; Krishna NV; Sreeha K
    J Conserv Dent; 2020; 23(3):314-318. PubMed ID: 33551607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of 3D conforming nickel titanium rotary instruments in eliminating canal wall bacteria from oval-shaped root canals.
    Bortoluzzi EA; Carlon D; Meghil MM; El-Awady AR; Niu L; Bergeron BE; Susin L; Cutler CW; Pashley DH; Tay FR
    J Dent; 2015 May; 43(5):597-604. PubMed ID: 25593001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative Assessment of apically Extruded Bacteria using different Instrumentation Techniques and Preparation Taper.
    Priyank H; Pandey V; Sethi A; Sharma VJ; Bali H; Punia RS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Sep; 18(9):826-830. PubMed ID: 28874649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An ex vivo quantification of the apically extruded bacteria following use of nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
    Mohammadi Z
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(4):120-2. PubMed ID: 18277742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Apical extrusion of debris using ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary systems.
    Koçak MM; Çiçek E; Koçak S; Sağlam BC; Yılmaz N
    Int Endod J; 2015 Mar; 48(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 24863544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of apically extruded bacteria associated with different nickel-titanium systems.
    Türker SA; Uzunoğlu E; Aslan MH
    J Endod; 2015 Jun; 41(6):953-5. PubMed ID: 25799537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical reduction of the intracanal Enterococcus faecalis population by Hyflex CM, K3XF, ProTaper Next, and two manual instrument systems: an in vitro comparative study.
    Tewari RK; Ali S; Mishra SK; Kumar A; Andrabi SM; Zoya A; Alam S
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2016 May; 7(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 25424649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effectiveness of three instrumentation techniques on the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from a root canal: an in vitro study.
    Colak M; Evcil S; Bayindir YZ; Yigit N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Feb; 6(1):94-106. PubMed ID: 15719081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of three rotary systems and hand instrumentation technique for the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from the root canal.
    Gorduysus M; Nagas E; Torun OY; Gorduysus O
    Aust Endod J; 2011 Dec; 37(3):128-33. PubMed ID: 22117720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical reduction in intracanal Enterococcus faecalis when using three different single-file systems: an ex vivo comparative study.
    Üreyen Kaya B; Erik CE; Sesli Çetin E; Köle M; Maden M
    Int Endod J; 2019 Jan; 52(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 29985531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of ProTaper Next and HyFlex instruments on apical debris extrusion in curved canals.
    Koçak MM; Çiçek E; Koçak S; Sağlam BC; Furuncuoğlu F
    Int Endod J; 2016 Oct; 49(10):996-1000. PubMed ID: 26383696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.