355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25961633)
21. A computer-aided detection system for the evaluation of breast cancer by mammographic appearance and lesion size.
Brem RF; Hoffmeister JW; Zisman G; DeSimio MP; Rogers SK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Mar; 184(3):893-6. PubMed ID: 15728614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection system by mammographic appearance and histopathology.
Brem RF; Rapelyea JA; Zisman G; Hoffmeister JW; Desimio MP
Cancer; 2005 Sep; 104(5):931-5. PubMed ID: 16047331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting.
Birdwell RL; Bandodkar P; Ikeda DM
Radiology; 2005 Aug; 236(2):451-7. PubMed ID: 16040901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Detection of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography.
Murakami R; Kumita S; Tani H; Yoshida T; Sugizaki K; Kuwako T; Kiriyama T; Hakozaki K; Okazaki E; Yanagihara K; Iida S; Haga S; Tsuchiya S
J Digit Imaging; 2013 Aug; 26(4):768-73. PubMed ID: 23319110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience.
Destounis SV; DiNitto P; Logan-Young W; Bonaccio E; Zuley ML; Willison KM
Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):578-84. PubMed ID: 15229350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Computer-aided detection system performance on current and previous digital mammograms in patients with contralateral metachronous breast cancer.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Chang JM
Acta Radiol; 2012 May; 53(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 22403080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting.
Skaane P; Gullien R; Bjørndal H; Eben EB; Ekseth U; Haakenaasen U; Jahr G; Jebsen IN; Krager M
Acta Radiol; 2012 Jun; 53(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 22593120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reproducibility--an important factor determining the quality of computer-aided detection (CAD) systems.
Malich A; Azhari T; Böhm T; Fleck M; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2000 Dec; 36(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 11091020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Visibility of microcalcification clusters and masses in breast tomosynthesis image volumes and digital mammography: a 4AFC human observer study.
Timberg P; Baath M; Andersson I; Mattsson S; Tingberg A; Ruschin M
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2431-7. PubMed ID: 22559613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Computer-aided detection in mammography: an assessment of performance on current and prior images.
Zheng B; Shah R; Wallace L; Hakim C; Ganott MA; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2002 Nov; 9(11):1245-50. PubMed ID: 12449356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Computer-aided detection performance in mammographic examination of masses: assessment.
Gur D; Stalder JS; Hardesty LA; Zheng B; Sumkin JH; Chough DM; Shindel BE; Rockette HE
Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):418-23. PubMed ID: 15358846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography.
Ko JM; Nicholas MJ; Mendel JB; Slanetz PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1483-91. PubMed ID: 17114541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study.
Wallis MG; Moa E; Zanca F; Leifland K; Danielsson M
Radiology; 2012 Mar; 262(3):788-96. PubMed ID: 22274840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison.
Spangler ML; Zuley ML; Sumkin JH; Abrams G; Ganott MA; Hakim C; Perrin R; Chough DM; Shah R; Gur D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):320-4. PubMed ID: 21257882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program.
Karssemeijer N; Bluekens AM; Beijerinck D; Deurenberg JJ; Beekman M; Visser R; van Engen R; Bartels-Kortland A; Broeders MJ
Radiology; 2009 Nov; 253(2):353-8. PubMed ID: 19703851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The performance of computer-aided detection when analyzing prior mammograms of newly detected breast cancers with special focus on the time interval from initial imaging to detection.
Malich A; Schmidt S; Fischer DR; Facius M; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 69(3):574-8. PubMed ID: 18337045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of computer-aided detection systems in the detection of small invasive breast carcinoma.
Ellis RL; Meade AA; Mathiason MA; Willison KM; Logan-Young W
Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 17885183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Early clinical experience with digital breast tomosynthesis for screening mammography.
Durand MA; Haas BM; Yao X; Geisel JL; Raghu M; Hooley RJ; Horvath LJ; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2015 Jan; 274(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 25188431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Computer-aided detection of amorphous calcifications.
Soo MS; Rosen EL; Xia JQ; Ghate S; Baker JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Mar; 184(3):887-92. PubMed ID: 15728613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial.
Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Makariou E; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Lo SC; Freedman M; Adler D; Bailey J; Blane C; Hoff D; Hunt K; Joynt L; Klein K; Paramagul C; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA
Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):208-14. PubMed ID: 14990808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
