355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25961633)
41. Features of prospectively overlooked computer-aided detection marks on prior screening digital mammograms in women with breast cancer.
Cho N; Kim SJ; Choi HY; Lyou CY; Moon WK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Nov; 195(5):1276-82. PubMed ID: 20966340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Diagnostic value of full-field digital mammography for breast carcinoma].
Ding JH; Peng WJ; Jiang ZX; Xu LH; Hu DT; Zheng XJ
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2009 Nov; 31(11):854-7. PubMed ID: 20137352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: false-positive marks and their reproducibility in negative mammograms.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Seong MH; Cho N; Chang JM
Acta Radiol; 2009 Nov; 50(9):999-1004. PubMed ID: 19863409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography: sensitivity of commercial CAD systems for detecting architectural distortion.
Baker JA; Rosen EL; Lo JY; Gimenez EI; Walsh R; Soo MS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):1083-8. PubMed ID: 14500236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Radiologist detection of microcalcifications with and without computer-aided detection: a comparative study.
Brem RF; Schoonjans JM
Clin Radiol; 2001 Feb; 56(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 11222075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus supplemental diagnostic mammographic views for evaluation of noncalcified breast lesions.
Zuley ML; Bandos AI; Ganott MA; Sumkin JH; Kelly AE; Catullo VJ; Rathfon GY; Lu AH; Gur D
Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 23143023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparison of two software versions of a commercially available computer-aided detection (CAD) system for detecting breast cancer.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Kim SY; Chang JM; Kim SM; Cho N
Acta Radiol; 2010 Jun; 51(5):482-90. PubMed ID: 20429765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Improving digital breast tomosynthesis reading time: A pilot multi-reader, multi-case study using concurrent Computer-Aided Detection (CAD).
Balleyguier C; Arfi-Rouche J; Levy L; Toubiana PR; Cohen-Scali F; Toledano AY; Boyer B
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Dec; 97():83-89. PubMed ID: 29153373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Digital mammography: effects of reduced radiation dose on diagnostic performance.
Samei E; Saunders RS; Baker JA; Delong DM
Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):396-404. PubMed ID: 17356178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Who could benefit the most from using a computer-aided detection system in full-field digital mammography?
Jung NY; Kang BJ; Kim HS; Cha ES; Lee JH; Park CS; Whang IY; Kim SH; An YY; Choi JJ
World J Surg Oncol; 2014 May; 12():168. PubMed ID: 24885214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of digital screening mammography and screen-film mammography in the early detection of clinically relevant cancers: a multicenter study.
Bluekens AM; Holland R; Karssemeijer N; Broeders MJ; den Heeten GJ
Radiology; 2012 Dec; 265(3):707-14. PubMed ID: 23033499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Mass detection in reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis volumes with a computer-aided detection system trained on 2D mammograms.
van Schie G; Wallis MG; Leifland K; Danielsson M; Karssemeijer N
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041902. PubMed ID: 23556896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images.
Skaane P; Bandos AI; Eben EB; Jebsen IN; Krager M; Haakenaasen U; Ekseth U; Izadi M; Hofvind S; Gullien R
Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 24484063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammograms.
Zheng B; Chang YH; Staiger M; Good W; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 1995 Aug; 2(8):655-62. PubMed ID: 9419620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Quantitative comparison of clustered microcalcifications in for-presentation and for-processing mammograms in full-field digital mammography.
Wang J; Nishikawa RM; Yang Y
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3726-3738. PubMed ID: 28477395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Can compression be reduced for breast tomosynthesis? Monte carlo study on mass and microcalcification conspicuity in tomosynthesis.
Saunders RS; Samei E; Lo JY; Baker JA
Radiology; 2009 Jun; 251(3):673-82. PubMed ID: 19474373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program.
Skaane P; Bandos AI; Gullien R; Eben EB; Ekseth U; Haakenaasen U; Izadi M; Jebsen IN; Jahr G; Krager M; Niklason LT; Hofvind S; Gur D
Radiology; 2013 Apr; 267(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 23297332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. GPCALMA: implementation in Italian hospitals of a computer aided detection system for breast lesions by mammography examination.
Lauria A
Phys Med; 2009 Jun; 25(2):58-72. PubMed ID: 18602854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Computer-aided detection of breast masses depicted on full-field digital mammograms: a performance assessment.
Zheng B; Sumkin JH; Zuley ML; Lederman D; Wang X; Gur D
Br J Radiol; 2012 Jun; 85(1014):e153-61. PubMed ID: 21343322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
