These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25961880)

  • 1. Loss of attentional inhibition in older adults--Does it really exist? An experimental dissociation of inhibitory and memory retrieval processes.
    Giesen C; Eberhard M; Rothermund K
    Psychol Aging; 2015 Jun; 30(2):220-31. PubMed ID: 25961880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dissociating distractor inhibition and episodic retrieval processes in children: No evidence for developmental deficits.
    Giesen C; Weissmann F; Rothermund K
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Feb; 166():212-231. PubMed ID: 28946043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses and previous targets: experimental dissociations of distractor-response and distractor-target bindings.
    Giesen C; Rothermund K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):645-659. PubMed ID: 24294915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Separating after-effects of target and distractor processing in the tactile sensory modality.
    Wesslein AK; Moeller B; Frings C; Giesen C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Apr; 81(3):809-822. PubMed ID: 30628034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the decay of distractor-response episodes.
    Frings C
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 20705549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intact episodic retrieval in older adults: evidence from an auditory negative priming task.
    Mayr S; Buchner A
    Exp Aging Res; 2014; 40(1):13-39. PubMed ID: 24467698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Disentangling inhibition-based and retrieval-based aftereffects of distractors: Cognitive versus motor processes.
    Singh T; Laub R; Burgard JP; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 May; 44(5):797-805. PubMed ID: 29154633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dissecting stimulus-response binding effects: Grouping by color separately impacts integration and retrieval processes.
    Laub R; Frings C; Moeller B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1474-1488. PubMed ID: 29687358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distractor-based stimulus-response bindings retrieve decisions independent of motor programs.
    Nett N; Bröder A; Frings C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Nov; 171():57-64. PubMed ID: 27665268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distractor inhibition: Evidence from lateralized readiness potentials.
    Pramme L; Dierolf AM; Naumann E; Frings C
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Aug; 98():74-81. PubMed ID: 26114922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contextual modulation of prime response retrieval processes: Evidence from auditory negative priming.
    Mayr S; Möller M; Buchner A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):1918-1931. PubMed ID: 30094603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Negative priming 1985 to 2015: a measure of inhibition, the emergence of alternative accounts, and the multiple process challenge.
    D'Angelo MC; Thomson DR; Tipper SP; Milliken B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Oct; 69(10):1890-909. PubMed ID: 27065048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the robustness of prime response retrieval processes: evidence from auditory negative priming without probe interference.
    Mayr S; Buchner A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Feb; 67(2):335-57. PubMed ID: 23799324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of attended repetition trials on negative priming in younger and older adults.
    Simone PM; Ahrens K; Foerde KE; Spinetta M
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jan; 34(1):187-95. PubMed ID: 16686117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysing the relationship between target-to-target and distractor-to-target repetitions: evidence for a common mechanism.
    Frings C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Nov; 61(11):1641-9. PubMed ID: 18609398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An attentional-adaptation account of spatial negative priming: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Liu XL; Walsh MM; Reder LM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 14(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 24464637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Aging and cognitive slowing: example of attentional processes--evaluation procedures and related questions].
    Eusop E; Sebban C; Piette F
    Encephale; 2001; 27(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 11294037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The availability of attentional resources modulates the inhibitory strength related to weakly activated priming.
    Wang Y; Wang Y; Liu P; Dai D; Di M; Chen Q
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1655-64. PubMed ID: 27198916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor-response bindings.
    Giesen C; Frings C; Rothermund K
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Apr; 40(3):373-87. PubMed ID: 22081277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Positive and negative priming differences between short-term and long-term identity coding of word-specific attentional priorities.
    McLennan KS; Neumann E; Russell PN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1426-1441. PubMed ID: 30644057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.