479 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25962993)
1. Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy is a feasible and safe approach for patients with oesophageal cancer.
Mei X; Xu M; Guo M; Xie M; Liu C; Wang Z
ANZ J Surg; 2016 Apr; 86(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 25962993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Xie MR; Liu CQ; Guo MF; Mei XY; Sun XH; Xu MQ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 May; 97(5):1721-7. PubMed ID: 24657031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer].
Xie M; Liu C; Sun X; Guo M; Wu H; Xu M
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Jul; 53(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 26359073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and left transthoracic esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Wang Q; Wu Z; Zhan T; Fang S; Zhang S; Shen G; Wu M
BMC Cancer; 2019 May; 19(1):500. PubMed ID: 31132995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally Invasive Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy (MIILE): A Single-Center Experience.
Wang J; Xu MQ; Xie MR; Mei XY
Indian J Surg; 2017 Aug; 79(4):319-325. PubMed ID: 28827906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis and McKeown oesophagectomy in Chinese patients with stage IA-IIIB oesophageal squamous cell cancer: a multicentre, non-interventional and observational study.
Zhang T; Hou X; Li Y; Fu X; Liu L; Xu L; Liu Y
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 30(6):812-819. PubMed ID: 32285107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The sweet approach is still worthwhile in modern esophagectomy.
Ma J; Zhan C; Wang L; Jiang W; Zhang Y; Shi Y; Wang Q
Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 May; 97(5):1728-33. PubMed ID: 24650587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety comparison of minimally invasive abdomen-only esophagectomy versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a retrospective cohort study.
Wang CP; Rogers MP; Bach G; Sujka J; Mhaskar R; DuCoin C
Surg Endosc; 2022 Mar; 36(3):1887-1893. PubMed ID: 33825009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single-position, minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy for lower thoracic oesophageal cancer.
Zhang G; Liang C; Shen G; Chai Y
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Dec; 46(6):1032-4. PubMed ID: 24755100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Initial experience of total thoracoscopic and laparoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Merritt RE
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2012 Apr; 22(3):214-9. PubMed ID: 22393924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagostomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Compared with open approach.
Zhang Z; Xu M; Guo M; Liu X
Int J Surg; 2017 Sep; 45():98-104. PubMed ID: 28778695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre.
Sihag S; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Lanuti M; Allan JS; Mathisen DJ; Morse CR
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2012 Sep; 42(3):430-7. PubMed ID: 22345284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oesophagectomy: The expanding role of minimally invasive surgery in oesophageal cancer.
van den Berg JW; Luketich JD; Cheong E
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2018; 36-37():75-80. PubMed ID: 30551859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-inferiority of minimally invasive oesophagectomy: an 8-year retrospective case series.
Findlay L; Yao C; Bennett DH; Byrom R; Davies N
Surg Endosc; 2017 Sep; 31(9):3681-3689. PubMed ID: 28078465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes after totally minimally invasive versus hybrid and open Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: results from the International Esodata Study Group.
van der Wilk BJ; Hagens ERC; Eyck BM; Gisbertz SS; van Hillegersberg R; Nafteux P; Schröder W; Nilsson M; Wijnhoven BPL; Lagarde SM; van Berge Henegouwen MI;
Br J Surg; 2022 Feb; 109(3):283-290. PubMed ID: 35024794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Open and laparoscopically assisted oesophagectomy: a prospective comparative study.
Bailey L; Khan O; Willows E; Somers S; Mercer S; Toh S
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Feb; 43(2):268-73. PubMed ID: 22753051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy more expensive than open despite shorter length of stay.
Dhamija A; Dhamija A; Hancock J; McCloskey B; Kim AW; Detterbeck FC; Boffa DJ
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 May; 45(5):904-9. PubMed ID: 24092502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A long-term follow-up study of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with linear stapled anastomosis.
Okabe H; Tsunoda S; Sunagawa H; Saji M; Hirai K; Nakau M; Tanaka E; Obama K
Surg Endosc; 2022 Mar; 36(3):1979-1988. PubMed ID: 33837477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does minimally invasive oesophagectomy provide a benefit in hospital length of stay when compared with open oesophagectomy?
Rodham P; Batty JA; McElnay PJ; Immanuel A
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(3):360-7. PubMed ID: 26669851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single-incision laparo-thoracoscopic minimally invasive oesophagectomy to treat oesophageal cancer†.
Lee JM; Yang SM; Yang PW; Huang PM
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 49 Suppl 1():i59-63. PubMed ID: 26547093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
