155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25963339)
1. In vitro evaluation of the antibiofilm properties of chlorhexidine and delmopinol on dental implant surfaces.
Ready D; Theodoridis G; Green I; Ciric L; Pratten J; Tay W; McDonald A
Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2015 Jun; 45(6):662-6. PubMed ID: 25963339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Chemotherapeutic decontamination of dental implants colonized by mature multispecies oral biofilm.
Dostie S; Alkadi LT; Owen G; Bi J; Shen Y; Haapasalo M; Larjava HS
J Clin Periodontol; 2017 Apr; 44(4):403-409. PubMed ID: 28117914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Antimicrobial Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy and Light-Activated Disinfection Against Bacterial Species on Titanium Dental Implants.
Azizi B; Budimir A; Mehmeti B; Jakovljević S; Bago I; Gjorgievska E; Gabrić D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):831-837. PubMed ID: 30024999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anti-biofilm activity of zinc oxide and hydroxyapatite nanoparticles as dental implant coating materials.
Abdulkareem EH; Memarzadeh K; Allaker RP; Huang J; Pratten J; Spratt D
J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1462-9. PubMed ID: 26497232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Essential oils and zirconia dental implant materials.
Al-Radha AS; Younes C; Diab BS; Jenkinson HF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(6):1497-505. PubMed ID: 24278917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biofilm removal and antimicrobial activity of two different air-polishing powders: an in vitro study.
Drago L; Del Fabbro M; Bortolin M; Vassena C; De Vecchi E; Taschieri S
J Periodontol; 2014 Nov; 85(11):e363-9. PubMed ID: 25060742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Antimicrobial mouthrinse use as an adjunct method in peri-implant biofilm control.
Pedrazzi V; Escobar EC; Cortelli JR; Haas AN; Andrade AK; Pannuti CM; Almeida ER; Costa FO; Cortelli SC; Rode Sde M
Braz Oral Res; 2014; 28 Spec No():. PubMed ID: 25003787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of six different peri-implantitis disinfection methods on in vivo human oral biofilm.
Gosau M; Hahnel S; Schwarz F; Gerlach T; Reichert TE; Bürgers R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Aug; 21(8):866-72. PubMed ID: 20666798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Controlled release of chlorhexidine from a mesoporous silica-containing macroporous titanium dental implant prevents microbial biofilm formation.
De Cremer K; Braem A; Gerits E; De Brucker K; Vandamme K; Martens JA; Michiels J; Vleugels J; Cammue BP; Thevissen K
Eur Cell Mater; 2017 Jan; 33():13-27. PubMed ID: 28076651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of oral implant surface roughness on bacterial biofilm formation and treatment efficacy.
Lin HY; Liu Y; Wismeijer D; Crielaard W; Deng DM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):1226-31. PubMed ID: 24066312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Antimicrobial efficacy of non-thermal plasma in comparison to chlorhexidine against dental biofilms on titanium discs in vitro - proof of principle experiment.
Koban I; Holtfreter B; Hübner NO; Matthes R; Sietmann R; Kindel E; Weltmann KD; Welk A; Kramer A; Kocher T
J Clin Periodontol; 2011 Oct; 38(10):956-65. PubMed ID: 21762196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laboratory evaluation of anti-biofilm agents for use in dental unit waterlines.
Meiller TF; Kelley JI; Baqui AA; DePaola LG
J Clin Dent; 2001; 12(4):97-103. PubMed ID: 11507923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences between single- and dual-species biofilms of Streptococcus mutans and Veillonella parvula in growth, acidogenicity and susceptibility to chlorhexidine.
Kara D; Luppens SB; Cate JM
Eur J Oral Sci; 2006 Feb; 114(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 16460342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental models for contamination of titanium surfaces and disinfection protocols.
Sousa V; Mardas N; Spratt D; Boniface D; Dard M; Donos N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1233-1242. PubMed ID: 26864128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical and hydrodynamic homecare devices to clean rough implant surfaces - an in vitro polyspecies biofilm study.
Ioannidis A; Thurnheer T; Hofer D; Sahrmann P; Guggenheim B; Schmidlin PR
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 May; 26(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 24944072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Success and side effects of different treatment options in the low current attack of bacterial biofilms on titanium implants.
Kaiser F; Scharnweber D; Bierbaum S; Wolf-Brandstetter C
Bioelectrochemistry; 2020 Jun; 133():107485. PubMed ID: 32120321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Erythritol/chlorhexidine combination reduces microbial biofilm and prevents its formation on titanium surfaces in vitro.
Drago L; Bortolin M; Taschieri S; De Vecchi E; Agrappi S; Del Fabbro M; Francetti L; Mattina R
J Oral Pathol Med; 2017 Sep; 46(8):625-631. PubMed ID: 27935124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chlorhexidine activity against bacterial biofilms.
Bonez PC; Dos Santos Alves CF; Dalmolin TV; Agertt VA; Mizdal CR; Flores Vda C; Marques JB; Santos RC; Anraku de Campos MM
Am J Infect Control; 2013 Dec; 41(12):e119-22. PubMed ID: 23910527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the effect of two chlorhexidine preparations on biofilm bacteria in vitro: a three-dimensional quantitative analysis.
Shen Y; Qian W; Chung C; Olsen I; Haapasalo M
J Endod; 2009 Jul; 35(7):981-5. PubMed ID: 19567319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of low direct current on anaerobic multispecies biofilm adhering to a titanium implant surface.
Sahrmann P; Zehnder M; Mohn D; Meier A; Imfeld T; Thurnheer T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Aug; 16(4):552-6. PubMed ID: 23167678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
