BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25963505)

  • 1. Comparison of applied dose and image quality in staging CT of neuroendocrine tumor patients using standard filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Böning G; Schäfer M; Grupp U; Kaul D; Kahn J; Pavel M; Maurer M; Denecke T; Hamm B; Streitparth F
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Aug; 84(8):1601-1607. PubMed ID: 25963505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CT follow-up in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs): combined radiation and contrast dose reduction.
    Böning G; Kahn JF; Kaul D; Rotzinger R; Freyhardt P; Pavel M; Streitparth F
    Acta Radiol; 2018 May; 59(5):517-526. PubMed ID: 28786299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction in upper abdominal computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction; comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Onishi H; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Tomiyama N
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1715-23. PubMed ID: 26037266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V technique for radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
    Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Kim D; Cho J; Kim S; Lee S; Lee J
    Br J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 88(1054):20150463. PubMed ID: 26234823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiation dose reduction in soft tissue neck CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR).
    Vachha B; Brodoefel H; Wilcox C; Hackney DB; Moonis G
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2222-6. PubMed ID: 24016832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients.
    Sagara Y; Hara AK; Pavlicek W; Silva AC; Paden RG; Wu Q
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):713-9. PubMed ID: 20729451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Iterative reconstruction: comparison of techniques for reduced-dose liver computed tomography following transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Cha MJ; Jeong WK; Choi D; Kim YK; Lim S; Choi SY; Lee WJ
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Dec; 57(12):1429-1437. PubMed ID: 26792822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of the Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique on Radiation Dose and Image Quality in Bone SPECT/CT.
    Sibille L; Chambert B; Alonso S; Barrau C; D'Estanque E; Al Tabaa Y; Collombier L; Demattei C; Kotzki PO; Boudousq V
    J Nucl Med; 2016 Jul; 57(7):1091-5. PubMed ID: 27013695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Hsieh J; Licato PE; Do S; Pien HH; Blake MA
    Radiology; 2010 Nov; 257(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 20829535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
    Prakash P; Kalra MK; Kambadakone AK; Pien H; Hsieh J; Blake MA; Sahani DV
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Apr; 45(4):202-10. PubMed ID: 20177389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography.
    Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Model-based iterative reconstruction compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back-projection in CT of the kidneys and the adjacent retroperitoneum.
    Olcott EW; Shin LK; Sommer G; Chan I; Rosenberg J; Molvin FL; Boas FE; Fleischmann D
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):774-84. PubMed ID: 24809318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions: clinical comparison of low-dose abdominal/pelvic computed tomography between adaptive statistical, model-based iterative reconstructions and traditional filtered back projection in 65 patients.
    Vardhanabhuti V; Riordan RD; Mitchell GR; Hyde C; Roobottom CA
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):209-16. PubMed ID: 24368613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultra-low dose chest computed tomography: Effect of iterative reconstruction levels on image quality.
    Afadzi M; Lysvik EK; Andersen HK; Martinsen ACT
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():62-68. PubMed ID: 31005179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiation dose reduction with hybrid iterative reconstruction for pediatric CT.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Shenoy-Bhangle AS; Saini A; Gervais DA; Westra SJ; Thrall JH
    Radiology; 2012 May; 263(2):537-46. PubMed ID: 22517962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Gilman MD; Hsieh J; Pien HH; Digumarthy SR; Shepard JA
    Radiology; 2011 May; 259(2):565-73. PubMed ID: 21386048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V With Combination of 80 kV for Reducing Radiation Dose and Improving Image Quality in Renal Computed Tomography Angiography for Slim Patients.
    Ren Z; Zhang X; Hu Z; Li D; Liu Z; Wei D; Jia Y; Yu N; Yu Y; Lei Y; Chen X; Guo C; Ren Z; He T
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Nov; 26(11):e324-e332. PubMed ID: 30655053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques in quantifying coronary calcium.
    Takahashi M; Kimura F; Umezawa T; Watanabe Y; Ogawa H
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 26276567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CT of the chest with model-based, fully iterative reconstruction: comparison with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Ichikawa Y; Kitagawa K; Nagasawa N; Murashima S; Sakuma H
    BMC Med Imaging; 2013 Aug; 13():27. PubMed ID: 23927627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.