These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25963752)

  • 41. Goal sharing with others modulates the sense of agency and motor accuracy in social contexts.
    Hayashida K; Nishi Y; Osumi M; Nobusako S; Morioka S
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246561. PubMed ID: 33539426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Is Your Color My Color? Dividing the Labor of the Stroop Task Between Co-actors.
    Yamaguchi M; Clarke EL; Egan DL
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1407. PubMed ID: 30131747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Prejudiced interactions: implicit racial bias reduces predictive simulation during joint action with an out-group avatar.
    Sacheli LM; Christensen A; Giese MA; Taubert N; Pavone EF; Aglioti SM; Candidi M
    Sci Rep; 2015 Feb; 5():8507. PubMed ID: 25687636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Neural correlates of verbal joint action: ERPs reveal common perception and action systems in a shared-Stroop task.
    Demiral ŞB; Gambi C; Nieuwland MS; Pickering MJ
    Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 1649(Pt A):79-89. PubMed ID: 27553631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The development of action planning in a joint action context.
    Paulus M
    Dev Psychol; 2016 Jul; 52(7):1052-63. PubMed ID: 27337512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Investing in commitment: Persistence in a joint action is enhanced by the perception of a partner's effort.
    Székely M; Michael J
    Cognition; 2018 May; 174():37-42. PubMed ID: 29407604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Distinct kinematic markers of demonstration and joint action coordination? Evidence from virtual xylophone playing.
    McEllin L; Knoblich G; Sebanz N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jun; 44(6):885-897. PubMed ID: 29154627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The end-state comfort effect facilitates joint action.
    Herbort O; Koning A; van Uem J; G J Meulenbroek R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):404-16. PubMed ID: 22321453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The phenomenology of controlling a moving object with another person.
    Dewey JA; Pacherie E; Knoblich G
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):383-97. PubMed ID: 24879353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Joint Simon effects for non-human co-actors.
    Stenzel A; Liepelt R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):143-58. PubMed ID: 26486640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Eye movements during action preparation.
    Vlaskamp BN; Schubö A
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Feb; 216(3):463-72. PubMed ID: 22108701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Sharing a mental number line across individuals? The role of body position and empathy in joint numerical cognition.
    Hartmann M; Fischer MH; Mast FW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jul; 72(7):1732-1740. PubMed ID: 30304994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Neural correlates of non-verbal social interactions: a dual-EEG study.
    Ménoret M; Varnet L; Fargier R; Cheylus A; Curie A; des Portes V; Nazir TA; Paulignan Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Mar; 55():85-97. PubMed ID: 24157538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Social task switching: On the automatic social engagement of executive functions.
    Dudarev V; Hassin RR
    Cognition; 2016 Jan; 146():223-8. PubMed ID: 26457838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Visuo-motor interference with a virtual partner is equally present in cooperative and competitive interactions.
    Era V; Aglioti SM; Mancusi C; Candidi M
    Psychol Res; 2020 Apr; 84(3):810-822. PubMed ID: 30191316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. History of interaction and task distribution modulate action simulation.
    Kourtis D; Knoblich G; Sebanz N
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1240-7. PubMed ID: 23583971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Sense of agency in joint action: influence of human and computer co-actors.
    Obhi SS; Hall P
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 211(3-4):663-70. PubMed ID: 21503652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Joint action modulates motor system involvement during action observation in 3-year-olds.
    Meyer M; Hunnius S; van Elk M; van Ede F; Bekkering H
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 211(3-4):581-92. PubMed ID: 21479943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Statistical learning in social action contexts.
    Monroy C; Meyer M; Gerson S; Hunnius S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177261. PubMed ID: 28475619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Different action patterns for cooperative and competitive behaviour.
    Georgiou I; Becchio C; Glover S; Castiello U
    Cognition; 2007 Mar; 102(3):415-33. PubMed ID: 16516188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.